Writing4practice in engineering courses: Implementation and assessment approaches

Sibylle Gruber, Debra Larson, David R Scott, Melvin Neville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we analyze a two-semester effort to integrate writing instruction into a multi-disciplinary sophomore engineering design course in Northern Arizona University's College of Engineering and Technology. Specifically, we describe the programmatic implementation and assessment approach to evaluate whether student writing improved over the course of the semester. After discussing the reasons for taking a writing-intensive approach to engineering, we analyze the results of a pre-and post-test administered over the span of an academic semester. Although the outcome of our assessment did not show significant improvement, we argue that writing instruction is important for increasing students’ overall learning skills. We conclude by pointing out several benefits and disadvantages of trying to assess writing improvement over two one-semester periods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-440
Number of pages22
JournalTechnical Communication Quarterly
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Communication

Cite this