Writing and speaking

Douglas Biber, Camilla Vásquez

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The past several decades have seen many shifts in perspective in the study of writing and speaking. In the early 20th century, a number of structural linguists (e.g., Sapir, Bloomfield) stressed the primacy of speech over writing, positing that writing was essentially an artifact of spoken language. Later scholars, working from a broader social perspective (e.g., Goody, 1968; Goody & Watt, 1968), documented the historical development and diffusion of different types of writing systems in various Western and non-Western cultures, and explored the social and cultural implications of the introduction of the technology of literacy, by analyzing some of the earliest functions of written texts. Other researchers in this tradition, most notably Olson and Ong, have argued that the introduction of literacy has had consequences for cognition, society, and language use. The work of Olson and Ong has come to be associated with an autonomous view of writing and with characterizations of writing as “detached, and self-contained” (Ong, 1982, p. 132) and “able to stand in as an unambiguous and autonomous representation of meaning” (Olson, 1977, p. 258).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Research on Writing
Subtitle of host publicationHistory, Society, School, Individual, Text
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages657-672
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)1410616479, 9781135251116
ISBN (Print)9780805848700
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

speaking
literacy
spoken language
historical development
cognition
artifact
language
Literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Biber, D., & Vásquez, C. (2009). Writing and speaking. In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text (pp. 657-672). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616470-45

Writing and speaking. / Biber, Douglas; Vásquez, Camilla.

Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Taylor and Francis, 2009. p. 657-672.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Biber, D & Vásquez, C 2009, Writing and speaking. in Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Taylor and Francis, pp. 657-672. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616470-45
Biber D, Vásquez C. Writing and speaking. In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Taylor and Francis. 2009. p. 657-672 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410616470-45
Biber, Douglas ; Vásquez, Camilla. / Writing and speaking. Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Taylor and Francis, 2009. pp. 657-672
@inbook{023e6a4eee314a32a4d6a40b8ff2664e,
title = "Writing and speaking",
abstract = "The past several decades have seen many shifts in perspective in the study of writing and speaking. In the early 20th century, a number of structural linguists (e.g., Sapir, Bloomfield) stressed the primacy of speech over writing, positing that writing was essentially an artifact of spoken language. Later scholars, working from a broader social perspective (e.g., Goody, 1968; Goody & Watt, 1968), documented the historical development and diffusion of different types of writing systems in various Western and non-Western cultures, and explored the social and cultural implications of the introduction of the technology of literacy, by analyzing some of the earliest functions of written texts. Other researchers in this tradition, most notably Olson and Ong, have argued that the introduction of literacy has had consequences for cognition, society, and language use. The work of Olson and Ong has come to be associated with an autonomous view of writing and with characterizations of writing as “detached, and self-contained” (Ong, 1982, p. 132) and “able to stand in as an unambiguous and autonomous representation of meaning” (Olson, 1977, p. 258).",
author = "Douglas Biber and Camilla V{\'a}squez",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781410616470-45",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780805848700",
pages = "657--672",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research on Writing",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Writing and speaking

AU - Biber, Douglas

AU - Vásquez, Camilla

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The past several decades have seen many shifts in perspective in the study of writing and speaking. In the early 20th century, a number of structural linguists (e.g., Sapir, Bloomfield) stressed the primacy of speech over writing, positing that writing was essentially an artifact of spoken language. Later scholars, working from a broader social perspective (e.g., Goody, 1968; Goody & Watt, 1968), documented the historical development and diffusion of different types of writing systems in various Western and non-Western cultures, and explored the social and cultural implications of the introduction of the technology of literacy, by analyzing some of the earliest functions of written texts. Other researchers in this tradition, most notably Olson and Ong, have argued that the introduction of literacy has had consequences for cognition, society, and language use. The work of Olson and Ong has come to be associated with an autonomous view of writing and with characterizations of writing as “detached, and self-contained” (Ong, 1982, p. 132) and “able to stand in as an unambiguous and autonomous representation of meaning” (Olson, 1977, p. 258).

AB - The past several decades have seen many shifts in perspective in the study of writing and speaking. In the early 20th century, a number of structural linguists (e.g., Sapir, Bloomfield) stressed the primacy of speech over writing, positing that writing was essentially an artifact of spoken language. Later scholars, working from a broader social perspective (e.g., Goody, 1968; Goody & Watt, 1968), documented the historical development and diffusion of different types of writing systems in various Western and non-Western cultures, and explored the social and cultural implications of the introduction of the technology of literacy, by analyzing some of the earliest functions of written texts. Other researchers in this tradition, most notably Olson and Ong, have argued that the introduction of literacy has had consequences for cognition, society, and language use. The work of Olson and Ong has come to be associated with an autonomous view of writing and with characterizations of writing as “detached, and self-contained” (Ong, 1982, p. 132) and “able to stand in as an unambiguous and autonomous representation of meaning” (Olson, 1977, p. 258).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075313388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075313388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781410616470-45

DO - 10.4324/9781410616470-45

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85075313388

SN - 9780805848700

SP - 657

EP - 672

BT - Handbook of Research on Writing

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -