Why does longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle?

Sharon Martinson, Richard Hofstetter, Matthew P. Ayres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pine forests throughout the world are subject to disturbance from tree-killing bark beetles, but pine species differ in their susceptibilities. In the southeastern United States, Pinus palustris Mill. suffers far less mortality from the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, than do its sympatric congeners. We tested the commonly invoked hypothesis that P. palustris has relatively low susceptibility because it has higher oleoresin flow than other pines, especially Pinus taeda L. However, seven studies in three states over 6 years refuted the hypothesis that P. palustris and P. taeda differ in their constitutive resin flow or in their capacity to replace resin depleted by either experimental wounding or natural beetle attacks. Additionally, surveys of natural beetle attacks revealed that P. taeda and P. palustris were equally likely to be attacked and killed when they cooccurred in front of growing infestations. Thus, the relative susceptibility of these two species changes with the spatial scale at which they are mixed, and the strong landscape-scale pattern of low mortality in P. palustris is not because individual trees are physiologically less susceptible. Ultimately, the conspicuous differential impact of D. frontalis on P. taeda and P. palustris may be the product of coevolution between tree defenses and beetle behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1966-1977
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Journal of Forest Research
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Dendroctonus frontalis
Pinus palustris
beetle
Pinus
Pinus taeda
Coleoptera
resin
resins
mortality
wounding
coevolution
oleoresins
bark
bark beetles
Southeastern United States
coniferous forests
disturbance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Why does longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle? / Martinson, Sharon; Hofstetter, Richard; Ayres, Matthew P.

In: Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 37, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 1966-1977.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martinson, Sharon ; Hofstetter, Richard ; Ayres, Matthew P. / Why does longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle?. In: Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2007 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 1966-1977.
@article{69eb29164e464c8daa627e973eb3ebcf,
title = "Why does longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle?",
abstract = "Pine forests throughout the world are subject to disturbance from tree-killing bark beetles, but pine species differ in their susceptibilities. In the southeastern United States, Pinus palustris Mill. suffers far less mortality from the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, than do its sympatric congeners. We tested the commonly invoked hypothesis that P. palustris has relatively low susceptibility because it has higher oleoresin flow than other pines, especially Pinus taeda L. However, seven studies in three states over 6 years refuted the hypothesis that P. palustris and P. taeda differ in their constitutive resin flow or in their capacity to replace resin depleted by either experimental wounding or natural beetle attacks. Additionally, surveys of natural beetle attacks revealed that P. taeda and P. palustris were equally likely to be attacked and killed when they cooccurred in front of growing infestations. Thus, the relative susceptibility of these two species changes with the spatial scale at which they are mixed, and the strong landscape-scale pattern of low mortality in P. palustris is not because individual trees are physiologically less susceptible. Ultimately, the conspicuous differential impact of D. frontalis on P. taeda and P. palustris may be the product of coevolution between tree defenses and beetle behavior.",
author = "Sharon Martinson and Richard Hofstetter and Ayres, {Matthew P.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1139/X07-066",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1966--1977",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Forest Research",
issn = "0045-5067",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why does longleaf pine have low susceptibility to southern pine beetle?

AU - Martinson, Sharon

AU - Hofstetter, Richard

AU - Ayres, Matthew P.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Pine forests throughout the world are subject to disturbance from tree-killing bark beetles, but pine species differ in their susceptibilities. In the southeastern United States, Pinus palustris Mill. suffers far less mortality from the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, than do its sympatric congeners. We tested the commonly invoked hypothesis that P. palustris has relatively low susceptibility because it has higher oleoresin flow than other pines, especially Pinus taeda L. However, seven studies in three states over 6 years refuted the hypothesis that P. palustris and P. taeda differ in their constitutive resin flow or in their capacity to replace resin depleted by either experimental wounding or natural beetle attacks. Additionally, surveys of natural beetle attacks revealed that P. taeda and P. palustris were equally likely to be attacked and killed when they cooccurred in front of growing infestations. Thus, the relative susceptibility of these two species changes with the spatial scale at which they are mixed, and the strong landscape-scale pattern of low mortality in P. palustris is not because individual trees are physiologically less susceptible. Ultimately, the conspicuous differential impact of D. frontalis on P. taeda and P. palustris may be the product of coevolution between tree defenses and beetle behavior.

AB - Pine forests throughout the world are subject to disturbance from tree-killing bark beetles, but pine species differ in their susceptibilities. In the southeastern United States, Pinus palustris Mill. suffers far less mortality from the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, than do its sympatric congeners. We tested the commonly invoked hypothesis that P. palustris has relatively low susceptibility because it has higher oleoresin flow than other pines, especially Pinus taeda L. However, seven studies in three states over 6 years refuted the hypothesis that P. palustris and P. taeda differ in their constitutive resin flow or in their capacity to replace resin depleted by either experimental wounding or natural beetle attacks. Additionally, surveys of natural beetle attacks revealed that P. taeda and P. palustris were equally likely to be attacked and killed when they cooccurred in front of growing infestations. Thus, the relative susceptibility of these two species changes with the spatial scale at which they are mixed, and the strong landscape-scale pattern of low mortality in P. palustris is not because individual trees are physiologically less susceptible. Ultimately, the conspicuous differential impact of D. frontalis on P. taeda and P. palustris may be the product of coevolution between tree defenses and beetle behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149108143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149108143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/X07-066

DO - 10.1139/X07-066

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1966

EP - 1977

JO - Canadian Journal of Forest Research

JF - Canadian Journal of Forest Research

SN - 0045-5067

IS - 10

ER -