Who are we? Genealogists negotiating ethno-racial identities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes how ethno-racial standpoints influence the ways that genealogists negotiate and narrate biological and/or social interpretations of family and social history. A constructivist methodological approach grounds the analysis of three family genealogists who all have African and European lineages, but differ in their current ethno-racial identities. These case studies serve as exemplars of how individuals negotiate the racial formation processes of past and present. I suggest that there is reflexive and political potential in bio-based genealogy to transform our current racial "common sense." The practice of genealogy reveals tacit social and biological assumptions that can serve as points of leverage for progressive social change, and yet vary by standpoint. In the context of the iconic gene we must be vigilant about the threat of genetic essentialism, yet the threat is mitigated by the simultaneous democratization of our knowledge and control over origin stories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-194
Number of pages22
JournalQualitative Sociology
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

genealogy
threat
social history
democratization
social change
interpretation
present

Keywords

  • Biology
  • Family
  • Genealogy
  • Identity
  • Racial formation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Who are we? Genealogists negotiating ethno-racial identities. / Hackstaff, Karla B.

In: Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 32, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 173-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79fbd0f5aba84dacb78cc1958e342a1e,
title = "Who are we? Genealogists negotiating ethno-racial identities",
abstract = "This paper analyzes how ethno-racial standpoints influence the ways that genealogists negotiate and narrate biological and/or social interpretations of family and social history. A constructivist methodological approach grounds the analysis of three family genealogists who all have African and European lineages, but differ in their current ethno-racial identities. These case studies serve as exemplars of how individuals negotiate the racial formation processes of past and present. I suggest that there is reflexive and political potential in bio-based genealogy to transform our current racial {"}common sense.{"} The practice of genealogy reveals tacit social and biological assumptions that can serve as points of leverage for progressive social change, and yet vary by standpoint. In the context of the iconic gene we must be vigilant about the threat of genetic essentialism, yet the threat is mitigated by the simultaneous democratization of our knowledge and control over origin stories.",
keywords = "Biology, Family, Genealogy, Identity, Racial formation",
author = "Hackstaff, {Karla B}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11133-009-9126-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "173--194",
journal = "Qualitative Sociology",
issn = "0162-0436",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who are we? Genealogists negotiating ethno-racial identities

AU - Hackstaff, Karla B

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - This paper analyzes how ethno-racial standpoints influence the ways that genealogists negotiate and narrate biological and/or social interpretations of family and social history. A constructivist methodological approach grounds the analysis of three family genealogists who all have African and European lineages, but differ in their current ethno-racial identities. These case studies serve as exemplars of how individuals negotiate the racial formation processes of past and present. I suggest that there is reflexive and political potential in bio-based genealogy to transform our current racial "common sense." The practice of genealogy reveals tacit social and biological assumptions that can serve as points of leverage for progressive social change, and yet vary by standpoint. In the context of the iconic gene we must be vigilant about the threat of genetic essentialism, yet the threat is mitigated by the simultaneous democratization of our knowledge and control over origin stories.

AB - This paper analyzes how ethno-racial standpoints influence the ways that genealogists negotiate and narrate biological and/or social interpretations of family and social history. A constructivist methodological approach grounds the analysis of three family genealogists who all have African and European lineages, but differ in their current ethno-racial identities. These case studies serve as exemplars of how individuals negotiate the racial formation processes of past and present. I suggest that there is reflexive and political potential in bio-based genealogy to transform our current racial "common sense." The practice of genealogy reveals tacit social and biological assumptions that can serve as points of leverage for progressive social change, and yet vary by standpoint. In the context of the iconic gene we must be vigilant about the threat of genetic essentialism, yet the threat is mitigated by the simultaneous democratization of our knowledge and control over origin stories.

KW - Biology

KW - Family

KW - Genealogy

KW - Identity

KW - Racial formation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549125557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64549125557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11133-009-9126-4

DO - 10.1007/s11133-009-9126-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:64549125557

VL - 32

SP - 173

EP - 194

JO - Qualitative Sociology

JF - Qualitative Sociology

SN - 0162-0436

IS - 2

ER -