Validation of a web-based ESL test

Carol A. Chapelle, Joan M Jamieson, Volker Hegelheimer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The web offers new opportunities to realize some of the current ideals for interactive language assessment by providing learners information about their language ability at their convenience. If such tests are to be trusted to provide learners with information that might help to improve their language ability, the tests need to undergo validation processes, but validation theory does not offer specific guidance about what should be included in a validity argument. Conventional wisdom suggests that low-stakes tests require less rigorous validation than high-stakes tests, but what are the factors that affect decisions about the validation process for either? Attempting to make these contributing factors explicit, this article examines the ways in which the purpose of a low-stakes web-based ESL (English as a second language) test guided its design and the validation process. The validity argument resulting from the first phase of the validation process is illustrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)409-439
Number of pages31
JournalLanguage Testing
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

language
ability
wisdom
World Wide Web
Stakes
Language
High-stakes
Conventional
Guidance
Language Tests
Wisdom
Ideal
Language Assessment
English as a Second Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Validation of a web-based ESL test. / Chapelle, Carol A.; Jamieson, Joan M; Hegelheimer, Volker.

In: Language Testing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.01.2003, p. 409-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chapelle, CA, Jamieson, JM & Hegelheimer, V 2003, 'Validation of a web-based ESL test', Language Testing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 409-439. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt266oa
Chapelle, Carol A. ; Jamieson, Joan M ; Hegelheimer, Volker. / Validation of a web-based ESL test. In: Language Testing. 2003 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 409-439.
@article{b947291c0621444a9ad5d7379da39e6c,
title = "Validation of a web-based ESL test",
abstract = "The web offers new opportunities to realize some of the current ideals for interactive language assessment by providing learners information about their language ability at their convenience. If such tests are to be trusted to provide learners with information that might help to improve their language ability, the tests need to undergo validation processes, but validation theory does not offer specific guidance about what should be included in a validity argument. Conventional wisdom suggests that low-stakes tests require less rigorous validation than high-stakes tests, but what are the factors that affect decisions about the validation process for either? Attempting to make these contributing factors explicit, this article examines the ways in which the purpose of a low-stakes web-based ESL (English as a second language) test guided its design and the validation process. The validity argument resulting from the first phase of the validation process is illustrated.",
author = "Chapelle, {Carol A.} and Jamieson, {Joan M} and Volker Hegelheimer",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1191/0265532203lt266oa",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "409--439",
journal = "Language Testing",
issn = "0265-5322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a web-based ESL test

AU - Chapelle, Carol A.

AU - Jamieson, Joan M

AU - Hegelheimer, Volker

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The web offers new opportunities to realize some of the current ideals for interactive language assessment by providing learners information about their language ability at their convenience. If such tests are to be trusted to provide learners with information that might help to improve their language ability, the tests need to undergo validation processes, but validation theory does not offer specific guidance about what should be included in a validity argument. Conventional wisdom suggests that low-stakes tests require less rigorous validation than high-stakes tests, but what are the factors that affect decisions about the validation process for either? Attempting to make these contributing factors explicit, this article examines the ways in which the purpose of a low-stakes web-based ESL (English as a second language) test guided its design and the validation process. The validity argument resulting from the first phase of the validation process is illustrated.

AB - The web offers new opportunities to realize some of the current ideals for interactive language assessment by providing learners information about their language ability at their convenience. If such tests are to be trusted to provide learners with information that might help to improve their language ability, the tests need to undergo validation processes, but validation theory does not offer specific guidance about what should be included in a validity argument. Conventional wisdom suggests that low-stakes tests require less rigorous validation than high-stakes tests, but what are the factors that affect decisions about the validation process for either? Attempting to make these contributing factors explicit, this article examines the ways in which the purpose of a low-stakes web-based ESL (English as a second language) test guided its design and the validation process. The validity argument resulting from the first phase of the validation process is illustrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644472011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21644472011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0265532203lt266oa

DO - 10.1191/0265532203lt266oa

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 409

EP - 439

JO - Language Testing

JF - Language Testing

SN - 0265-5322

IS - 4

ER -