Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets

Edward C. Stites, Meraj Aziz, Matthew S. Creamer, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Richard G Posner, William S. Hlavacek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proteins in cell signaling networks tend to interact promiscuously through low-affinity interactions. Consequently, evaluating the physiological importance of mapped interactions can be difficult. Attempts to do so have tended to focus on single, measurable physicochemical factors, such as affinity or abundance. For example, interaction importance has been assessed on the basis of the relative affinities of binding partners for a protein of interest, such as a receptor. However, multiple factors can be expected to simultaneously influence the recruitment of proteins to a receptor (and the potential of these proteins to contribute to receptor signaling), including affinity, abundance, and competition, which is a network property. Here, we demonstrate that measurements of protein copy numbers and binding affinities can be integrated within the framework of a mechanistic, computational model that accounts for mass action and competition. We use cell line-specific models to rank the relative importance of protein-protein interactions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network for 11 different cell lines. Each model accounts for experimentally characterized interactions of six autophosphorylation sites in EGFR with proteins containing a Src homology 2 and/or phosphotyrosine-binding domain. We measure importance as the predicted maximal extent of recruitment of a protein to EGFR following ligand-stimulated activation of EGFR signaling. We find that interactions ranked highly by this metric include experimentally detected interactions. Proteins with high importance rank in multiple cell lines include proteins with recognized, well-characterized roles in EGFR signaling, such as GRB2 and SHC1, as well as a protein with a less well-defined role, YES1. Our results reveal potential cell line-specific differences in recruitment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1819-1829
Number of pages11
JournalBiophysical Journal
Volume108
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 7 2015

Fingerprint

Proteomics
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Proteins
Cell Line
Datasets
Phosphotyrosine
Ligands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Stites, E. C., Aziz, M., Creamer, M. S., Von Hoff, D. D., Posner, R. G., & Hlavacek, W. S. (2015). Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets. Biophysical Journal, 108(7), 1819-1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030

Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets. / Stites, Edward C.; Aziz, Meraj; Creamer, Matthew S.; Von Hoff, Daniel D.; Posner, Richard G; Hlavacek, William S.

In: Biophysical Journal, Vol. 108, No. 7, 07.04.2015, p. 1819-1829.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stites, EC, Aziz, M, Creamer, MS, Von Hoff, DD, Posner, RG & Hlavacek, WS 2015, 'Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets', Biophysical Journal, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 1819-1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030
Stites, Edward C. ; Aziz, Meraj ; Creamer, Matthew S. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Posner, Richard G ; Hlavacek, William S. / Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets. In: Biophysical Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 108, No. 7. pp. 1819-1829.
@article{b4fe45264f3147c483aa51a1876c028c,
title = "Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets",
abstract = "Proteins in cell signaling networks tend to interact promiscuously through low-affinity interactions. Consequently, evaluating the physiological importance of mapped interactions can be difficult. Attempts to do so have tended to focus on single, measurable physicochemical factors, such as affinity or abundance. For example, interaction importance has been assessed on the basis of the relative affinities of binding partners for a protein of interest, such as a receptor. However, multiple factors can be expected to simultaneously influence the recruitment of proteins to a receptor (and the potential of these proteins to contribute to receptor signaling), including affinity, abundance, and competition, which is a network property. Here, we demonstrate that measurements of protein copy numbers and binding affinities can be integrated within the framework of a mechanistic, computational model that accounts for mass action and competition. We use cell line-specific models to rank the relative importance of protein-protein interactions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network for 11 different cell lines. Each model accounts for experimentally characterized interactions of six autophosphorylation sites in EGFR with proteins containing a Src homology 2 and/or phosphotyrosine-binding domain. We measure importance as the predicted maximal extent of recruitment of a protein to EGFR following ligand-stimulated activation of EGFR signaling. We find that interactions ranked highly by this metric include experimentally detected interactions. Proteins with high importance rank in multiple cell lines include proteins with recognized, well-characterized roles in EGFR signaling, such as GRB2 and SHC1, as well as a protein with a less well-defined role, YES1. Our results reveal potential cell line-specific differences in recruitment.",
author = "Stites, {Edward C.} and Meraj Aziz and Creamer, {Matthew S.} and {Von Hoff}, {Daniel D.} and Posner, {Richard G} and Hlavacek, {William S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "1819--1829",
journal = "Biophysical Journal",
issn = "0006-3495",
publisher = "Biophysical Society",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets

AU - Stites, Edward C.

AU - Aziz, Meraj

AU - Creamer, Matthew S.

AU - Von Hoff, Daniel D.

AU - Posner, Richard G

AU - Hlavacek, William S.

PY - 2015/4/7

Y1 - 2015/4/7

N2 - Proteins in cell signaling networks tend to interact promiscuously through low-affinity interactions. Consequently, evaluating the physiological importance of mapped interactions can be difficult. Attempts to do so have tended to focus on single, measurable physicochemical factors, such as affinity or abundance. For example, interaction importance has been assessed on the basis of the relative affinities of binding partners for a protein of interest, such as a receptor. However, multiple factors can be expected to simultaneously influence the recruitment of proteins to a receptor (and the potential of these proteins to contribute to receptor signaling), including affinity, abundance, and competition, which is a network property. Here, we demonstrate that measurements of protein copy numbers and binding affinities can be integrated within the framework of a mechanistic, computational model that accounts for mass action and competition. We use cell line-specific models to rank the relative importance of protein-protein interactions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network for 11 different cell lines. Each model accounts for experimentally characterized interactions of six autophosphorylation sites in EGFR with proteins containing a Src homology 2 and/or phosphotyrosine-binding domain. We measure importance as the predicted maximal extent of recruitment of a protein to EGFR following ligand-stimulated activation of EGFR signaling. We find that interactions ranked highly by this metric include experimentally detected interactions. Proteins with high importance rank in multiple cell lines include proteins with recognized, well-characterized roles in EGFR signaling, such as GRB2 and SHC1, as well as a protein with a less well-defined role, YES1. Our results reveal potential cell line-specific differences in recruitment.

AB - Proteins in cell signaling networks tend to interact promiscuously through low-affinity interactions. Consequently, evaluating the physiological importance of mapped interactions can be difficult. Attempts to do so have tended to focus on single, measurable physicochemical factors, such as affinity or abundance. For example, interaction importance has been assessed on the basis of the relative affinities of binding partners for a protein of interest, such as a receptor. However, multiple factors can be expected to simultaneously influence the recruitment of proteins to a receptor (and the potential of these proteins to contribute to receptor signaling), including affinity, abundance, and competition, which is a network property. Here, we demonstrate that measurements of protein copy numbers and binding affinities can be integrated within the framework of a mechanistic, computational model that accounts for mass action and competition. We use cell line-specific models to rank the relative importance of protein-protein interactions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network for 11 different cell lines. Each model accounts for experimentally characterized interactions of six autophosphorylation sites in EGFR with proteins containing a Src homology 2 and/or phosphotyrosine-binding domain. We measure importance as the predicted maximal extent of recruitment of a protein to EGFR following ligand-stimulated activation of EGFR signaling. We find that interactions ranked highly by this metric include experimentally detected interactions. Proteins with high importance rank in multiple cell lines include proteins with recognized, well-characterized roles in EGFR signaling, such as GRB2 and SHC1, as well as a protein with a less well-defined role, YES1. Our results reveal potential cell line-specific differences in recruitment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926484905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926484905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030

DO - 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 25863072

AN - SCOPUS:84926484905

VL - 108

SP - 1819

EP - 1829

JO - Biophysical Journal

JF - Biophysical Journal

SN - 0006-3495

IS - 7

ER -