Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport

Nicole J. Chimera, Meghan Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen™, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-217
Number of pages16
JournalWorld Journal of Orthopaedics
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 18 2016

Fingerprint

Athletic Injuries
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Reproducibility of Results
Research Personnel
Education

Keywords

  • Functional Movement Screen
  • Star excursion balance test
  • Tuck jump analysis
  • Y Balance Test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport. / Chimera, Nicole J.; Warren, Meghan.

In: World Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 18.04.2016, p. 202-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca6782b838114266b966b7979092bf46,
title = "Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport",
abstract = "Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen™, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.",
keywords = "Functional Movement Screen, Star excursion balance test, Tuck jump analysis, Y Balance Test",
author = "Chimera, {Nicole J.} and Meghan Warren",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "18",
doi = "10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "202--217",
journal = "World Journal of Orthopaedics",
issn = "2218-5836",
publisher = "di xue qian yuan bian ji bu",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport

AU - Chimera, Nicole J.

AU - Warren, Meghan

PY - 2016/4/18

Y1 - 2016/4/18

N2 - Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen™, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.

AB - Clinical movement screening tests are gaining popularity as a means to determine injury risk and to implement training programs to prevent sport injury. While these screens are being used readily in the clinical field, it is only recently that some of these have started to gain attention from a research perspective. This limits applicability and poses questions to the validity, and in some cases the reliability, of the clinical movement tests as they relate to injury prediction, intervention, and prevention. This editorial will review the following clinical movement screening tests: Functional Movement Screen™, Star Excursion Balance Test, Y Balance Test, Drop Jump Screening Test, Landing Error Scoring System, and the Tuck Jump Analysis in regards to test administration, reliability, validity, factors that affect test performance, intervention programs, and usefulness for injury prediction. It is important to review the aforementioned factors for each of these clinical screening tests as this may help clinicians interpret the current body of literature. While each of these screening tests were developed by clinicians based on what appears to be clinical practice, this paper brings to light that this is a need for collaboration between clinicians and researchers to ensure validity of clinically meaningful tests so that they are used appropriately in future clinical practice. Further, this editorial may help to identify where the research is lacking and, thus, drive future research questions in regards to applicability and appropriateness of clinical movement screening tools.

KW - Functional Movement Screen

KW - Star excursion balance test

KW - Tuck jump analysis

KW - Y Balance Test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963612780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963612780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202

DO - 10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963612780

VL - 7

SP - 202

EP - 217

JO - World Journal of Orthopaedics

JF - World Journal of Orthopaedics

SN - 2218-5836

IS - 4

ER -