U.S. Federal fire and forest policy

Emphasizing resilience in dry forests

Scott L. Stephens, Brandon M. Collins, Eric Biber, Peter Z Fule

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current U.S. forest fire policy emphasizes short-Term outcomes versus long-Term goals. This perspective drives managers to focus on the protection of high-valued resources, whether ecosystem-based or developed infrastructure, at the expense of forest resilience. Given these current and future challenges posed by wildland fire and because the U.S. Forest Service spent >50% of its budget on fire suppression in 2015, a review and reexamination of existing policy is warranted. One of the most difficult challenges to revising forest fire policy is that agency organizations and decision making processes are not structured in ways to ensure that fire management is thoroughly considered in management decisions. Current resource-specific policies are so focused on individual concerns that they may be missing the fact that there are "endangered landscapes" that are threatened by changing climate and fire. We propose that forest restoration should be at least equal to other land management priorities because large-scale restoration is necessary for the sake of forest ecosystem integrity now and into the future. Another proposal is to switch the "default" rule in federal planning documents that currently have to "justify" managed wildland fire; instead, U.S. federal agencies should be required to disclose the long-Term ecological impacts of continued fire suppression. Proposed legislation that identifies the most expensive 2% of wildfires annually to be funded from emergency funding instead of by the federal land management agencies. If increases in forest restoration fail to accompany the change in how large wildfires are funded, then U.S. fire suppression costs will remain high while resilience will continue to decline. Expansion of the wildland-urban interface will continue to drive suppression costs higher; new federal partnerships with States and local governments are needed to address this problem. Given the legacy of fire suppression and a future of climate change, management for other values in forests will be, in the long run, futile without also managing for long-Term forest resilience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1584
JournalEcosphere
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

fire suppression
forest policy
dry forest
dry forests
wildfires
forest restoration
forest fires
land management
climate change
wildland-urban interface
state government
USDA Forest Service
public lands
forest fire
local government
wildfire
infrastructure
funding
forest ecosystems
laws and regulations

Keywords

  • Fire management
  • Fire suppression
  • Forest policy
  • Forest restoration
  • Prescribed fire
  • Wildfire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

U.S. Federal fire and forest policy : Emphasizing resilience in dry forests. / Stephens, Scott L.; Collins, Brandon M.; Biber, Eric; Fule, Peter Z.

In: Ecosphere, Vol. 7, No. 11, 1584, 01.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stephens, Scott L. ; Collins, Brandon M. ; Biber, Eric ; Fule, Peter Z. / U.S. Federal fire and forest policy : Emphasizing resilience in dry forests. In: Ecosphere. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 11.
@article{4b6a83246cef4ee8a9e6d7b4bd61f4c9,
title = "U.S. Federal fire and forest policy: Emphasizing resilience in dry forests",
abstract = "Current U.S. forest fire policy emphasizes short-Term outcomes versus long-Term goals. This perspective drives managers to focus on the protection of high-valued resources, whether ecosystem-based or developed infrastructure, at the expense of forest resilience. Given these current and future challenges posed by wildland fire and because the U.S. Forest Service spent >50{\%} of its budget on fire suppression in 2015, a review and reexamination of existing policy is warranted. One of the most difficult challenges to revising forest fire policy is that agency organizations and decision making processes are not structured in ways to ensure that fire management is thoroughly considered in management decisions. Current resource-specific policies are so focused on individual concerns that they may be missing the fact that there are {"}endangered landscapes{"} that are threatened by changing climate and fire. We propose that forest restoration should be at least equal to other land management priorities because large-scale restoration is necessary for the sake of forest ecosystem integrity now and into the future. Another proposal is to switch the {"}default{"} rule in federal planning documents that currently have to {"}justify{"} managed wildland fire; instead, U.S. federal agencies should be required to disclose the long-Term ecological impacts of continued fire suppression. Proposed legislation that identifies the most expensive 2{\%} of wildfires annually to be funded from emergency funding instead of by the federal land management agencies. If increases in forest restoration fail to accompany the change in how large wildfires are funded, then U.S. fire suppression costs will remain high while resilience will continue to decline. Expansion of the wildland-urban interface will continue to drive suppression costs higher; new federal partnerships with States and local governments are needed to address this problem. Given the legacy of fire suppression and a future of climate change, management for other values in forests will be, in the long run, futile without also managing for long-Term forest resilience.",
keywords = "Fire management, Fire suppression, Forest policy, Forest restoration, Prescribed fire, Wildfire",
author = "Stephens, {Scott L.} and Collins, {Brandon M.} and Eric Biber and Fule, {Peter Z}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ecs2.1584",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Ecosphere",
issn = "2150-8925",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - U.S. Federal fire and forest policy

T2 - Emphasizing resilience in dry forests

AU - Stephens, Scott L.

AU - Collins, Brandon M.

AU - Biber, Eric

AU - Fule, Peter Z

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Current U.S. forest fire policy emphasizes short-Term outcomes versus long-Term goals. This perspective drives managers to focus on the protection of high-valued resources, whether ecosystem-based or developed infrastructure, at the expense of forest resilience. Given these current and future challenges posed by wildland fire and because the U.S. Forest Service spent >50% of its budget on fire suppression in 2015, a review and reexamination of existing policy is warranted. One of the most difficult challenges to revising forest fire policy is that agency organizations and decision making processes are not structured in ways to ensure that fire management is thoroughly considered in management decisions. Current resource-specific policies are so focused on individual concerns that they may be missing the fact that there are "endangered landscapes" that are threatened by changing climate and fire. We propose that forest restoration should be at least equal to other land management priorities because large-scale restoration is necessary for the sake of forest ecosystem integrity now and into the future. Another proposal is to switch the "default" rule in federal planning documents that currently have to "justify" managed wildland fire; instead, U.S. federal agencies should be required to disclose the long-Term ecological impacts of continued fire suppression. Proposed legislation that identifies the most expensive 2% of wildfires annually to be funded from emergency funding instead of by the federal land management agencies. If increases in forest restoration fail to accompany the change in how large wildfires are funded, then U.S. fire suppression costs will remain high while resilience will continue to decline. Expansion of the wildland-urban interface will continue to drive suppression costs higher; new federal partnerships with States and local governments are needed to address this problem. Given the legacy of fire suppression and a future of climate change, management for other values in forests will be, in the long run, futile without also managing for long-Term forest resilience.

AB - Current U.S. forest fire policy emphasizes short-Term outcomes versus long-Term goals. This perspective drives managers to focus on the protection of high-valued resources, whether ecosystem-based or developed infrastructure, at the expense of forest resilience. Given these current and future challenges posed by wildland fire and because the U.S. Forest Service spent >50% of its budget on fire suppression in 2015, a review and reexamination of existing policy is warranted. One of the most difficult challenges to revising forest fire policy is that agency organizations and decision making processes are not structured in ways to ensure that fire management is thoroughly considered in management decisions. Current resource-specific policies are so focused on individual concerns that they may be missing the fact that there are "endangered landscapes" that are threatened by changing climate and fire. We propose that forest restoration should be at least equal to other land management priorities because large-scale restoration is necessary for the sake of forest ecosystem integrity now and into the future. Another proposal is to switch the "default" rule in federal planning documents that currently have to "justify" managed wildland fire; instead, U.S. federal agencies should be required to disclose the long-Term ecological impacts of continued fire suppression. Proposed legislation that identifies the most expensive 2% of wildfires annually to be funded from emergency funding instead of by the federal land management agencies. If increases in forest restoration fail to accompany the change in how large wildfires are funded, then U.S. fire suppression costs will remain high while resilience will continue to decline. Expansion of the wildland-urban interface will continue to drive suppression costs higher; new federal partnerships with States and local governments are needed to address this problem. Given the legacy of fire suppression and a future of climate change, management for other values in forests will be, in the long run, futile without also managing for long-Term forest resilience.

KW - Fire management

KW - Fire suppression

KW - Forest policy

KW - Forest restoration

KW - Prescribed fire

KW - Wildfire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995802329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995802329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.1584

DO - 10.1002/ecs2.1584

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Ecosphere

JF - Ecosphere

SN - 2150-8925

IS - 11

M1 - 1584

ER -