Understanding Affirmative Action: From the Practitioner's Perspective

Joseph Michael Pace, Zachary A Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Affirmative action was originally meant to remove by law, as required by the Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “artificial barriers” that often prevented women and minority groups from entering the workforce. By the late 1960's and early 1970's affirmative action had been altered to become the governmental attempt to provide compensatory opportunities for groups who experience discrimination when seeking employment. More recently the legal essence of affirmative action refers to specific guidelines and rules to recruit, hire, and promote disadvantaged groups for the purpose of eliminating the existing effects of past discriminatory practices. Despite a plethora of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, affirmative action has yet to be clearly defined as a cohesive public policy. The Court's failure to define affirmative action as a coherent constitutional and legal concept has led to widespread misinterpretation of affirmative action goals among public administrators. This notion is substantiated by examining the results of a survey of local government officials at the county and municipal level which measures their understanding and perception of federal law pertaining to affirmative action's meaning and purpose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-147
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Personnel Management
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

affirmative action
act
Group
federal law
court decision
civil rights
Affirmative action
Supreme Court
public policy
discrimination
minority
Law
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Administration
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Understanding Affirmative Action : From the Practitioner's Perspective. / Pace, Joseph Michael; Smith, Zachary A.

In: Public Personnel Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1995, p. 139-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb9f91a6f8544ce38522118576d1b49e,
title = "Understanding Affirmative Action: From the Practitioner's Perspective",
abstract = "Affirmative action was originally meant to remove by law, as required by the Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “artificial barriers” that often prevented women and minority groups from entering the workforce. By the late 1960's and early 1970's affirmative action had been altered to become the governmental attempt to provide compensatory opportunities for groups who experience discrimination when seeking employment. More recently the legal essence of affirmative action refers to specific guidelines and rules to recruit, hire, and promote disadvantaged groups for the purpose of eliminating the existing effects of past discriminatory practices. Despite a plethora of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, affirmative action has yet to be clearly defined as a cohesive public policy. The Court's failure to define affirmative action as a coherent constitutional and legal concept has led to widespread misinterpretation of affirmative action goals among public administrators. This notion is substantiated by examining the results of a survey of local government officials at the county and municipal level which measures their understanding and perception of federal law pertaining to affirmative action's meaning and purpose.",
author = "Pace, {Joseph Michael} and Smith, {Zachary A}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1177/009102609502400203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "139--147",
journal = "Public Personnel Management",
issn = "0091-0260",
publisher = "International Personnel Management Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Affirmative Action

T2 - From the Practitioner's Perspective

AU - Pace, Joseph Michael

AU - Smith, Zachary A

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Affirmative action was originally meant to remove by law, as required by the Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “artificial barriers” that often prevented women and minority groups from entering the workforce. By the late 1960's and early 1970's affirmative action had been altered to become the governmental attempt to provide compensatory opportunities for groups who experience discrimination when seeking employment. More recently the legal essence of affirmative action refers to specific guidelines and rules to recruit, hire, and promote disadvantaged groups for the purpose of eliminating the existing effects of past discriminatory practices. Despite a plethora of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, affirmative action has yet to be clearly defined as a cohesive public policy. The Court's failure to define affirmative action as a coherent constitutional and legal concept has led to widespread misinterpretation of affirmative action goals among public administrators. This notion is substantiated by examining the results of a survey of local government officials at the county and municipal level which measures their understanding and perception of federal law pertaining to affirmative action's meaning and purpose.

AB - Affirmative action was originally meant to remove by law, as required by the Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act, “artificial barriers” that often prevented women and minority groups from entering the workforce. By the late 1960's and early 1970's affirmative action had been altered to become the governmental attempt to provide compensatory opportunities for groups who experience discrimination when seeking employment. More recently the legal essence of affirmative action refers to specific guidelines and rules to recruit, hire, and promote disadvantaged groups for the purpose of eliminating the existing effects of past discriminatory practices. Despite a plethora of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, affirmative action has yet to be clearly defined as a cohesive public policy. The Court's failure to define affirmative action as a coherent constitutional and legal concept has led to widespread misinterpretation of affirmative action goals among public administrators. This notion is substantiated by examining the results of a survey of local government officials at the county and municipal level which measures their understanding and perception of federal law pertaining to affirmative action's meaning and purpose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970782862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970782862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009102609502400203

DO - 10.1177/009102609502400203

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970782862

VL - 24

SP - 139

EP - 147

JO - Public Personnel Management

JF - Public Personnel Management

SN - 0091-0260

IS - 2

ER -