Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

Deborah N Huntzinger, A. M. Michalak, Christopher R Schwalm, P. Ciais, A. W. King, Y. Fang, K. Schaefer, Y. Wei, R. B. Cook, J. B. Fisher, D. Hayes, M. Huang, A. Ito, A. K. Jain, H. Lei, C. Lu, F. Maignan, J. Mao, N. Parazoo, S. PengB. Poulter, D. Ricciuto, X. Shi, H. Tian, W. Wang, N. Zeng, F. Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4765
JournalScientific Reports
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

climate feedback
carbon sink
carbon
prediction
climate
environmental conditions
terrestrial ecosystem
land
atmosphere
modeling
temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions. / Huntzinger, Deborah N; Michalak, A. M.; Schwalm, Christopher R; Ciais, P.; King, A. W.; Fang, Y.; Schaefer, K.; Wei, Y.; Cook, R. B.; Fisher, J. B.; Hayes, D.; Huang, M.; Ito, A.; Jain, A. K.; Lei, H.; Lu, C.; Maignan, F.; Mao, J.; Parazoo, N.; Peng, S.; Poulter, B.; Ricciuto, D.; Shi, X.; Tian, H.; Wang, W.; Zeng, N.; Zhao, F.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, No. 1, 4765, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huntzinger, DN, Michalak, AM, Schwalm, CR, Ciais, P, King, AW, Fang, Y, Schaefer, K, Wei, Y, Cook, RB, Fisher, JB, Hayes, D, Huang, M, Ito, A, Jain, AK, Lei, H, Lu, C, Maignan, F, Mao, J, Parazoo, N, Peng, S, Poulter, B, Ricciuto, D, Shi, X, Tian, H, Wang, W, Zeng, N & Zhao, F 2017, 'Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions', Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 4765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2
Huntzinger, Deborah N ; Michalak, A. M. ; Schwalm, Christopher R ; Ciais, P. ; King, A. W. ; Fang, Y. ; Schaefer, K. ; Wei, Y. ; Cook, R. B. ; Fisher, J. B. ; Hayes, D. ; Huang, M. ; Ito, A. ; Jain, A. K. ; Lei, H. ; Lu, C. ; Maignan, F. ; Mao, J. ; Parazoo, N. ; Peng, S. ; Poulter, B. ; Ricciuto, D. ; Shi, X. ; Tian, H. ; Wang, W. ; Zeng, N. ; Zhao, F. / Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions. In: Scientific Reports. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.
@article{b4026e0b97c34435b1f48bd5eb94bf14,
title = "Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions",
abstract = "Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85{\%} of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.",
author = "Huntzinger, {Deborah N} and Michalak, {A. M.} and Schwalm, {Christopher R} and P. Ciais and King, {A. W.} and Y. Fang and K. Schaefer and Y. Wei and Cook, {R. B.} and Fisher, {J. B.} and D. Hayes and M. Huang and A. Ito and Jain, {A. K.} and H. Lei and C. Lu and F. Maignan and J. Mao and N. Parazoo and S. Peng and B. Poulter and D. Ricciuto and X. Shi and H. Tian and W. Wang and N. Zeng and F. Zhao",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N

AU - Michalak, A. M.

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

AU - Ciais, P.

AU - King, A. W.

AU - Fang, Y.

AU - Schaefer, K.

AU - Wei, Y.

AU - Cook, R. B.

AU - Fisher, J. B.

AU - Hayes, D.

AU - Huang, M.

AU - Ito, A.

AU - Jain, A. K.

AU - Lei, H.

AU - Lu, C.

AU - Maignan, F.

AU - Mao, J.

AU - Parazoo, N.

AU - Peng, S.

AU - Poulter, B.

AU - Ricciuto, D.

AU - Shi, X.

AU - Tian, H.

AU - Wang, W.

AU - Zeng, N.

AU - Zhao, F.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

AB - Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022214777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022214777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2

DO - 10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 28684755

AN - SCOPUS:85022214777

VL - 7

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 4765

ER -