Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005

Junjiong Shao, Xuhui Zhou, Yiqi Luo, Guodong Zhang, Wei Yan, Jiaxuan Li, Bo Li, Li Dan, Joshua B. Fisher, Zhiqiang Gao, Yong He, Deborah N Huntzinger, Atul K. Jain, Jiafu Mao, Jihua Meng, Anna M. Michalak, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Changhui Peng, Benjamin Poulter, Christopher R Schwalm & 8 others Xiaoying Shi, Rui Sun, Fulu Tao, Hanqin Tian, Yaxing Wei, Ning Zeng, Qiuan Zhu, Wenquan Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the importance of net primary productivity (NPP) and net biome productivity (NBP), estimates of NPP and NBP for China are highly uncertain. To investigate the main sources of uncertainty, we synthesized model estimates of NPP and NBP for China from published literature and the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). The literature-based results showed that total NPP and NBP in China were 3.35 ± 1.25 and 0.14 ± 0.094 Pg C yr−1, respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis based on literature data showed that model type was the primary source of the uncertainty, explaining 36% and 64% of the variance in NPP and NBP, respectively. Spatiotemporal scales, land cover conditions, inclusion of the N cycle, and effects of N addition also contributed to the overall uncertainty. Results based on the MsTMIP data suggested that model structures were overwhelmingly important (>90%) for the overall uncertainty compared to simulations with different combinations of time-varying global change factors. The interannual pattern of NPP was similar among diverse studies and increased by 0.012 Pg C yr−1 during 1981–2000. In addition, high uncertainty in China's NPP occurred in areas with high productivity, whereas NBP showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that to significantly reduce uncertainty in estimated NPP and NBP, model structures should be substantially tested on the basis of empirical results. To this end, coordinated distributed experiments with multiple global change factors might be a practical approach that can validate specific structures of different models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1372-1393
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume121
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

uncertainty analysis
Uncertainty analysis
biome
productivity
primary productivity
China
Productivity
uncertainty
ecosystems
global change
synthesis
Model structures
land cover
estimates

Keywords

  • China
  • interannual variability
  • model structure
  • net biome productivity
  • net primary productivity
  • uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science
  • Forestry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Palaeontology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology

Cite this

Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005. / Shao, Junjiong; Zhou, Xuhui; Luo, Yiqi; Zhang, Guodong; Yan, Wei; Li, Jiaxuan; Li, Bo; Dan, Li; Fisher, Joshua B.; Gao, Zhiqiang; He, Yong; Huntzinger, Deborah N; Jain, Atul K.; Mao, Jiafu; Meng, Jihua; Michalak, Anna M.; Parazoo, Nicholas C.; Peng, Changhui; Poulter, Benjamin; Schwalm, Christopher R; Shi, Xiaoying; Sun, Rui; Tao, Fulu; Tian, Hanqin; Wei, Yaxing; Zeng, Ning; Zhu, Qiuan; Zhu, Wenquan.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 121, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 1372-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shao, J, Zhou, X, Luo, Y, Zhang, G, Yan, W, Li, J, Li, B, Dan, L, Fisher, JB, Gao, Z, He, Y, Huntzinger, DN, Jain, AK, Mao, J, Meng, J, Michalak, AM, Parazoo, NC, Peng, C, Poulter, B, Schwalm, CR, Shi, X, Sun, R, Tao, F, Tian, H, Wei, Y, Zeng, N, Zhu, Q & Zhu, W 2016, 'Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005', Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 1372-1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003062
Shao, Junjiong ; Zhou, Xuhui ; Luo, Yiqi ; Zhang, Guodong ; Yan, Wei ; Li, Jiaxuan ; Li, Bo ; Dan, Li ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; Gao, Zhiqiang ; He, Yong ; Huntzinger, Deborah N ; Jain, Atul K. ; Mao, Jiafu ; Meng, Jihua ; Michalak, Anna M. ; Parazoo, Nicholas C. ; Peng, Changhui ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Schwalm, Christopher R ; Shi, Xiaoying ; Sun, Rui ; Tao, Fulu ; Tian, Hanqin ; Wei, Yaxing ; Zeng, Ning ; Zhu, Qiuan ; Zhu, Wenquan. / Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005. In: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2016 ; Vol. 121, No. 5. pp. 1372-1393.
@article{749a8180ad224537882ad4cfa54cbe4e,
title = "Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005",
abstract = "Despite the importance of net primary productivity (NPP) and net biome productivity (NBP), estimates of NPP and NBP for China are highly uncertain. To investigate the main sources of uncertainty, we synthesized model estimates of NPP and NBP for China from published literature and the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). The literature-based results showed that total NPP and NBP in China were 3.35 ± 1.25 and 0.14 ± 0.094 Pg C yr−1, respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis based on literature data showed that model type was the primary source of the uncertainty, explaining 36{\%} and 64{\%} of the variance in NPP and NBP, respectively. Spatiotemporal scales, land cover conditions, inclusion of the N cycle, and effects of N addition also contributed to the overall uncertainty. Results based on the MsTMIP data suggested that model structures were overwhelmingly important (>90{\%}) for the overall uncertainty compared to simulations with different combinations of time-varying global change factors. The interannual pattern of NPP was similar among diverse studies and increased by 0.012 Pg C yr−1 during 1981–2000. In addition, high uncertainty in China's NPP occurred in areas with high productivity, whereas NBP showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that to significantly reduce uncertainty in estimated NPP and NBP, model structures should be substantially tested on the basis of empirical results. To this end, coordinated distributed experiments with multiple global change factors might be a practical approach that can validate specific structures of different models.",
keywords = "China, interannual variability, model structure, net biome productivity, net primary productivity, uncertainty",
author = "Junjiong Shao and Xuhui Zhou and Yiqi Luo and Guodong Zhang and Wei Yan and Jiaxuan Li and Bo Li and Li Dan and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and Zhiqiang Gao and Yong He and Huntzinger, {Deborah N} and Jain, {Atul K.} and Jiafu Mao and Jihua Meng and Michalak, {Anna M.} and Parazoo, {Nicholas C.} and Changhui Peng and Benjamin Poulter and Schwalm, {Christopher R} and Xiaoying Shi and Rui Sun and Fulu Tao and Hanqin Tian and Yaxing Wei and Ning Zeng and Qiuan Zhu and Wenquan Zhu",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2015JG003062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "1372--1393",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity and net biome productivity in China during 1901–2005

AU - Shao, Junjiong

AU - Zhou, Xuhui

AU - Luo, Yiqi

AU - Zhang, Guodong

AU - Yan, Wei

AU - Li, Jiaxuan

AU - Li, Bo

AU - Dan, Li

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - Gao, Zhiqiang

AU - He, Yong

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N

AU - Jain, Atul K.

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Meng, Jihua

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

AU - Parazoo, Nicholas C.

AU - Peng, Changhui

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Sun, Rui

AU - Tao, Fulu

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Wei, Yaxing

AU - Zeng, Ning

AU - Zhu, Qiuan

AU - Zhu, Wenquan

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Despite the importance of net primary productivity (NPP) and net biome productivity (NBP), estimates of NPP and NBP for China are highly uncertain. To investigate the main sources of uncertainty, we synthesized model estimates of NPP and NBP for China from published literature and the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). The literature-based results showed that total NPP and NBP in China were 3.35 ± 1.25 and 0.14 ± 0.094 Pg C yr−1, respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis based on literature data showed that model type was the primary source of the uncertainty, explaining 36% and 64% of the variance in NPP and NBP, respectively. Spatiotemporal scales, land cover conditions, inclusion of the N cycle, and effects of N addition also contributed to the overall uncertainty. Results based on the MsTMIP data suggested that model structures were overwhelmingly important (>90%) for the overall uncertainty compared to simulations with different combinations of time-varying global change factors. The interannual pattern of NPP was similar among diverse studies and increased by 0.012 Pg C yr−1 during 1981–2000. In addition, high uncertainty in China's NPP occurred in areas with high productivity, whereas NBP showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that to significantly reduce uncertainty in estimated NPP and NBP, model structures should be substantially tested on the basis of empirical results. To this end, coordinated distributed experiments with multiple global change factors might be a practical approach that can validate specific structures of different models.

AB - Despite the importance of net primary productivity (NPP) and net biome productivity (NBP), estimates of NPP and NBP for China are highly uncertain. To investigate the main sources of uncertainty, we synthesized model estimates of NPP and NBP for China from published literature and the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). The literature-based results showed that total NPP and NBP in China were 3.35 ± 1.25 and 0.14 ± 0.094 Pg C yr−1, respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis based on literature data showed that model type was the primary source of the uncertainty, explaining 36% and 64% of the variance in NPP and NBP, respectively. Spatiotemporal scales, land cover conditions, inclusion of the N cycle, and effects of N addition also contributed to the overall uncertainty. Results based on the MsTMIP data suggested that model structures were overwhelmingly important (>90%) for the overall uncertainty compared to simulations with different combinations of time-varying global change factors. The interannual pattern of NPP was similar among diverse studies and increased by 0.012 Pg C yr−1 during 1981–2000. In addition, high uncertainty in China's NPP occurred in areas with high productivity, whereas NBP showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that to significantly reduce uncertainty in estimated NPP and NBP, model structures should be substantially tested on the basis of empirical results. To this end, coordinated distributed experiments with multiple global change factors might be a practical approach that can validate specific structures of different models.

KW - China

KW - interannual variability

KW - model structure

KW - net biome productivity

KW - net primary productivity

KW - uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973890114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973890114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2015JG003062

DO - 10.1002/2015JG003062

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 1372

EP - 1393

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 5

ER -