Tuck Jump Assessment: An Exploratory Factor Analysis in a College Age Population

Monica R. Lininger, Craig A. Smith, Nicole J. Chimera, Philipp Hoog, Meghan Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lininger, MR, Smith, CA, Chimera, NJ, Hoog, P, and Warren, M. Tuck Jump Assessment: An exploratory factor analysis in a college age population. J Strength Cond Res 31(3): 653-659, 2017 - Due to the high rate of noncontact lower extremity injuries that occur in the collegiate setting, medical personnel are implementing screening mechanisms to identify those athletes that may be at risk for certain injuries before starting a sports season. The tuck jump assessment (TJA) was created as a "clinician friendly" tool to identify lower extremity landing technique flaws during a plyometric activity. There are 10 technique flaws that are assessed as either having the apparent deficit or not during the TJA. Technique flaws are then summed up for an overall score. Through expert consensus, these 10 technique flaws have been grouped into 5 modifiable risk factors: ligament dominance, quadriceps dominance, leg dominance or residual injury deficits, trunk dominance ("core" dysfunction), and technique perfection. Research has not investigated the psychometric properties of the TJA technique flaws or the modifiable risk factors. The present study is a psychometric analysis of the TJA technique flaws to measure the internal structure using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using data from collegiate athletes (n = 90) and a general college cohort (n = 99). The EFA suggested a 3 factor model accounting for 46% of the variance. The 3 factors were defined as fatigue, distal landing pattern, and proximal control. The results differ from the 5 modifiable risk categories as previously suggested. These results may question the use of a single score, a unidimensional construct, of the TJA for injury screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-659
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Psychometrics
Athletes
Population
Lower Extremity
Ligaments
Sports
Fatigue
Leg
Consensus
Research

Keywords

  • data reduction
  • injury screening
  • plyometric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Tuck Jump Assessment : An Exploratory Factor Analysis in a College Age Population. / Lininger, Monica R.; Smith, Craig A.; Chimera, Nicole J.; Hoog, Philipp; Warren, Meghan.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 653-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lininger, Monica R. ; Smith, Craig A. ; Chimera, Nicole J. ; Hoog, Philipp ; Warren, Meghan. / Tuck Jump Assessment : An Exploratory Factor Analysis in a College Age Population. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 653-659.
@article{2d4b1ce30ef843a9b59c125b7568ef97,
title = "Tuck Jump Assessment: An Exploratory Factor Analysis in a College Age Population",
abstract = "Lininger, MR, Smith, CA, Chimera, NJ, Hoog, P, and Warren, M. Tuck Jump Assessment: An exploratory factor analysis in a college age population. J Strength Cond Res 31(3): 653-659, 2017 - Due to the high rate of noncontact lower extremity injuries that occur in the collegiate setting, medical personnel are implementing screening mechanisms to identify those athletes that may be at risk for certain injuries before starting a sports season. The tuck jump assessment (TJA) was created as a {"}clinician friendly{"} tool to identify lower extremity landing technique flaws during a plyometric activity. There are 10 technique flaws that are assessed as either having the apparent deficit or not during the TJA. Technique flaws are then summed up for an overall score. Through expert consensus, these 10 technique flaws have been grouped into 5 modifiable risk factors: ligament dominance, quadriceps dominance, leg dominance or residual injury deficits, trunk dominance ({"}core{"} dysfunction), and technique perfection. Research has not investigated the psychometric properties of the TJA technique flaws or the modifiable risk factors. The present study is a psychometric analysis of the TJA technique flaws to measure the internal structure using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using data from collegiate athletes (n = 90) and a general college cohort (n = 99). The EFA suggested a 3 factor model accounting for 46{\%} of the variance. The 3 factors were defined as fatigue, distal landing pattern, and proximal control. The results differ from the 5 modifiable risk categories as previously suggested. These results may question the use of a single score, a unidimensional construct, of the TJA for injury screening.",
keywords = "data reduction, injury screening, plyometric",
author = "Lininger, {Monica R.} and Smith, {Craig A.} and Chimera, {Nicole J.} and Philipp Hoog and Meghan Warren",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000001186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "653--659",
journal = "Strength and Conditioning Journal",
issn = "1524-1602",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tuck Jump Assessment

T2 - An Exploratory Factor Analysis in a College Age Population

AU - Lininger, Monica R.

AU - Smith, Craig A.

AU - Chimera, Nicole J.

AU - Hoog, Philipp

AU - Warren, Meghan

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Lininger, MR, Smith, CA, Chimera, NJ, Hoog, P, and Warren, M. Tuck Jump Assessment: An exploratory factor analysis in a college age population. J Strength Cond Res 31(3): 653-659, 2017 - Due to the high rate of noncontact lower extremity injuries that occur in the collegiate setting, medical personnel are implementing screening mechanisms to identify those athletes that may be at risk for certain injuries before starting a sports season. The tuck jump assessment (TJA) was created as a "clinician friendly" tool to identify lower extremity landing technique flaws during a plyometric activity. There are 10 technique flaws that are assessed as either having the apparent deficit or not during the TJA. Technique flaws are then summed up for an overall score. Through expert consensus, these 10 technique flaws have been grouped into 5 modifiable risk factors: ligament dominance, quadriceps dominance, leg dominance or residual injury deficits, trunk dominance ("core" dysfunction), and technique perfection. Research has not investigated the psychometric properties of the TJA technique flaws or the modifiable risk factors. The present study is a psychometric analysis of the TJA technique flaws to measure the internal structure using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using data from collegiate athletes (n = 90) and a general college cohort (n = 99). The EFA suggested a 3 factor model accounting for 46% of the variance. The 3 factors were defined as fatigue, distal landing pattern, and proximal control. The results differ from the 5 modifiable risk categories as previously suggested. These results may question the use of a single score, a unidimensional construct, of the TJA for injury screening.

AB - Lininger, MR, Smith, CA, Chimera, NJ, Hoog, P, and Warren, M. Tuck Jump Assessment: An exploratory factor analysis in a college age population. J Strength Cond Res 31(3): 653-659, 2017 - Due to the high rate of noncontact lower extremity injuries that occur in the collegiate setting, medical personnel are implementing screening mechanisms to identify those athletes that may be at risk for certain injuries before starting a sports season. The tuck jump assessment (TJA) was created as a "clinician friendly" tool to identify lower extremity landing technique flaws during a plyometric activity. There are 10 technique flaws that are assessed as either having the apparent deficit or not during the TJA. Technique flaws are then summed up for an overall score. Through expert consensus, these 10 technique flaws have been grouped into 5 modifiable risk factors: ligament dominance, quadriceps dominance, leg dominance or residual injury deficits, trunk dominance ("core" dysfunction), and technique perfection. Research has not investigated the psychometric properties of the TJA technique flaws or the modifiable risk factors. The present study is a psychometric analysis of the TJA technique flaws to measure the internal structure using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using data from collegiate athletes (n = 90) and a general college cohort (n = 99). The EFA suggested a 3 factor model accounting for 46% of the variance. The 3 factors were defined as fatigue, distal landing pattern, and proximal control. The results differ from the 5 modifiable risk categories as previously suggested. These results may question the use of a single score, a unidimensional construct, of the TJA for injury screening.

KW - data reduction

KW - injury screening

KW - plyometric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014548098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014548098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001186

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001186

M3 - Article

C2 - 26382132

AN - SCOPUS:85014548098

VL - 31

SP - 653

EP - 659

JO - Strength and Conditioning Journal

JF - Strength and Conditioning Journal

SN - 1524-1602

IS - 3

ER -