Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India

Xuan Liu, Pengzhu Zhang, Xin Li, Hsinchun Chen, Yan Dang, Catherine Larson, Mihail C. Roco, Xianwen Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as "Quantum dots," "Carbon nanotubes," "Atomic force microscopy," and "Scanning electron microscopy," while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1845-1866
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Nanoparticle Research
Volume11
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nanotechnology
India
Russian Federation
nanotechnology
patents
Patents
China
Citations
trends
Carbon Nanotubes
Trademarks
Atomic Force Microscopy
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Quantum Dots
research and development
productivity
Nanotubes
Research and Development
Semiconductor quantum dots
Productivity

Keywords

  • Bibliographic analysis
  • Citation analysis of articles and patents
  • Information visualization
  • International
  • Nanoscience
  • Nanotechnology
  • Research and development
  • Self-organizing maps
  • Technological innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Bioengineering

Cite this

Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. / Liu, Xuan; Zhang, Pengzhu; Li, Xin; Chen, Hsinchun; Dang, Yan; Larson, Catherine; Roco, Mihail C.; Wang, Xianwen.

In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 11, No. 8, 11.2009, p. 1845-1866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, X, Zhang, P, Li, X, Chen, H, Dang, Y, Larson, C, Roco, MC & Wang, X 2009, 'Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India', Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1845-1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7
Liu, Xuan ; Zhang, Pengzhu ; Li, Xin ; Chen, Hsinchun ; Dang, Yan ; Larson, Catherine ; Roco, Mihail C. ; Wang, Xianwen. / Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 8. pp. 1845-1866.
@article{e6f6eb5d60504fda83bf4933e9426471,
title = "Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India",
abstract = "China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43{\%} in China, 11.88{\%} in Russia, and 33.51{\%} in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96{\%}. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as {"}Quantum dots,{"} {"}Carbon nanotubes,{"} {"}Atomic force microscopy,{"} and {"}Scanning electron microscopy,{"} while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.",
keywords = "Bibliographic analysis, Citation analysis of articles and patents, Information visualization, International, Nanoscience, Nanotechnology, Research and development, Self-organizing maps, Technological innovation",
author = "Xuan Liu and Pengzhu Zhang and Xin Li and Hsinchun Chen and Yan Dang and Catherine Larson and Roco, {Mihail C.} and Xianwen Wang",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1845--1866",
journal = "Journal of Nanoparticle Research",
issn = "1388-0764",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India

AU - Liu, Xuan

AU - Zhang, Pengzhu

AU - Li, Xin

AU - Chen, Hsinchun

AU - Dang, Yan

AU - Larson, Catherine

AU - Roco, Mihail C.

AU - Wang, Xianwen

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as "Quantum dots," "Carbon nanotubes," "Atomic force microscopy," and "Scanning electron microscopy," while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.

AB - China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as "Quantum dots," "Carbon nanotubes," "Atomic force microscopy," and "Scanning electron microscopy," while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.

KW - Bibliographic analysis

KW - Citation analysis of articles and patents

KW - Information visualization

KW - International

KW - Nanoscience

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Research and development

KW - Self-organizing maps

KW - Technological innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350571676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350571676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7

DO - 10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1845

EP - 1866

JO - Journal of Nanoparticle Research

JF - Journal of Nanoparticle Research

SN - 1388-0764

IS - 8

ER -