Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article locates laments in interdiscursive chains and explores them in relation to four dimensions of interdiscursivity: (1) their inclusion of reported speech, (2) their anticipation and evocation of particular responses, (3) the generic constitution of each lament (its relation to others in the same genre), and (4) the global or local metacultural orientation of laments and related discourses. I argue that links between traditional laments and (post)modern mourning not only are ideological constructions but also are quite substantive. The article raises questions about nonlinguistic, gestural, and melodic modes of textuality and about the tendency of lament to be retrospective and to be labeled "backward." The fact that some voices label lament "backward" or "primitive" at the same time that others generate new laments on "the death of culture" illustrates the fundamental instability of (post)modern metadiscursive regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-71
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Linguistic Anthropology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

genre
constitution
inclusion
regime
death
discourse
Lament
Discourse

Keywords

  • Circulation
  • Lament
  • Metaculture
  • Postmodernism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{a81831d8b0b14b179a1dcdfb554c5085,
title = "Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: The circulation of discourse in metacultural context",
abstract = "This article locates laments in interdiscursive chains and explores them in relation to four dimensions of interdiscursivity: (1) their inclusion of reported speech, (2) their anticipation and evocation of particular responses, (3) the generic constitution of each lament (its relation to others in the same genre), and (4) the global or local metacultural orientation of laments and related discourses. I argue that links between traditional laments and (post)modern mourning not only are ideological constructions but also are quite substantive. The article raises questions about nonlinguistic, gestural, and melodic modes of textuality and about the tendency of lament to be retrospective and to be labeled {"}backward.{"} The fact that some voices label lament {"}backward{"} or {"}primitive{"} at the same time that others generate new laments on {"}the death of culture{"} illustrates the fundamental instability of (post)modern metadiscursive regimes.",
keywords = "Circulation, Lament, Metaculture, Postmodernism",
author = "{Wilce Jr}, {James M}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.60",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "60--71",
journal = "Journal of Linguistic Anthropology",
issn = "1055-1360",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traditional laments and postmodern regrets

T2 - The circulation of discourse in metacultural context

AU - Wilce Jr, James M

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - This article locates laments in interdiscursive chains and explores them in relation to four dimensions of interdiscursivity: (1) their inclusion of reported speech, (2) their anticipation and evocation of particular responses, (3) the generic constitution of each lament (its relation to others in the same genre), and (4) the global or local metacultural orientation of laments and related discourses. I argue that links between traditional laments and (post)modern mourning not only are ideological constructions but also are quite substantive. The article raises questions about nonlinguistic, gestural, and melodic modes of textuality and about the tendency of lament to be retrospective and to be labeled "backward." The fact that some voices label lament "backward" or "primitive" at the same time that others generate new laments on "the death of culture" illustrates the fundamental instability of (post)modern metadiscursive regimes.

AB - This article locates laments in interdiscursive chains and explores them in relation to four dimensions of interdiscursivity: (1) their inclusion of reported speech, (2) their anticipation and evocation of particular responses, (3) the generic constitution of each lament (its relation to others in the same genre), and (4) the global or local metacultural orientation of laments and related discourses. I argue that links between traditional laments and (post)modern mourning not only are ideological constructions but also are quite substantive. The article raises questions about nonlinguistic, gestural, and melodic modes of textuality and about the tendency of lament to be retrospective and to be labeled "backward." The fact that some voices label lament "backward" or "primitive" at the same time that others generate new laments on "the death of culture" illustrates the fundamental instability of (post)modern metadiscursive regimes.

KW - Circulation

KW - Lament

KW - Metaculture

KW - Postmodernism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31144470189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31144470189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.60

DO - 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.60

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31144470189

VL - 15

SP - 60

EP - 71

JO - Journal of Linguistic Anthropology

JF - Journal of Linguistic Anthropology

SN - 1055-1360

IS - 1

ER -