Tradeoffs and Compatibilities Among Ecosystem Services: Biological, Physical and Economic Drivers of Multifunctionality

Bradley J. Butterfield, Ashley L. Camhi, Rachel L. Rubin, Christopher R Schwalm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Balancing the joint production of multiple ecosystem services, also referred to as the 'multifunctionality' of an ecosystem or landscape, requires understanding of the ecological processes that produce and economic processes that evaluate those services. Here, we review the ecological tradeoffs and compatibilities among ecosystem processes that influence ecosystem multifunctionality with respect to ecosystem services, including variation in functional strategies, constraints on community assembly and direct effects of the abiotic environment. We then review how different valuation methods may alter the magnitude of tradeoffs and compatibilities in monetary terms. Among communities, functional diversity increases ecosystem multifunctionality, but community-average trait values are emerging as important drivers of ecosystem services with greater potential to produce tradeoffs when compared to functional diversity. However, research that links organismal functional strategies to community assembly rules in real, heterogeneous landscapes demonstrate that predictable tradeoffs among species do not consistently scale up to the community level, necessitating further research on trait-based community assembly in order to develop general predictive models of biotic effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Abiotic factors are frequently incorporated into mapping assessments of multifunctionality, but the emergent tradeoffs and compatibilities in ecosystem services driven by those factors are rarely assessed, despite a number of studies that have demonstrated their clear importance in ecosystem multifunctionality. Finally, while a variety of valuation methods are used to quantify the joint production of ecosystem services, only provisioning services are typically directly valued and assumed to have fixed correlations with other ecosystem services that can lead to inaccurate valuation, and potentially inappropriate prioritisation, of multiple ecosystem services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAdvances in Ecological Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem services
economics
ecosystems
ecosystem
valuation
functional diversity
assembly rule
prioritization
environmental factors
methodology

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Community assembly
  • Functional diversity
  • Joint production function
  • Mass-ratio hypothesis
  • Multifunctional landscape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Tradeoffs and Compatibilities Among Ecosystem Services : Biological, Physical and Economic Drivers of Multifunctionality. / Butterfield, Bradley J.; Camhi, Ashley L.; Rubin, Rachel L.; Schwalm, Christopher R.

In: Advances in Ecological Research, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11396b08d8a84b798b3807c2feebaf56,
title = "Tradeoffs and Compatibilities Among Ecosystem Services: Biological, Physical and Economic Drivers of Multifunctionality",
abstract = "Balancing the joint production of multiple ecosystem services, also referred to as the 'multifunctionality' of an ecosystem or landscape, requires understanding of the ecological processes that produce and economic processes that evaluate those services. Here, we review the ecological tradeoffs and compatibilities among ecosystem processes that influence ecosystem multifunctionality with respect to ecosystem services, including variation in functional strategies, constraints on community assembly and direct effects of the abiotic environment. We then review how different valuation methods may alter the magnitude of tradeoffs and compatibilities in monetary terms. Among communities, functional diversity increases ecosystem multifunctionality, but community-average trait values are emerging as important drivers of ecosystem services with greater potential to produce tradeoffs when compared to functional diversity. However, research that links organismal functional strategies to community assembly rules in real, heterogeneous landscapes demonstrate that predictable tradeoffs among species do not consistently scale up to the community level, necessitating further research on trait-based community assembly in order to develop general predictive models of biotic effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Abiotic factors are frequently incorporated into mapping assessments of multifunctionality, but the emergent tradeoffs and compatibilities in ecosystem services driven by those factors are rarely assessed, despite a number of studies that have demonstrated their clear importance in ecosystem multifunctionality. Finally, while a variety of valuation methods are used to quantify the joint production of ecosystem services, only provisioning services are typically directly valued and assumed to have fixed correlations with other ecosystem services that can lead to inaccurate valuation, and potentially inappropriate prioritisation, of multiple ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Community assembly, Functional diversity, Joint production function, Mass-ratio hypothesis, Multifunctional landscape",
author = "Butterfield, {Bradley J.} and Camhi, {Ashley L.} and Rubin, {Rachel L.} and Schwalm, {Christopher R}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Advances in Ecological Research",
issn = "0065-2504",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tradeoffs and Compatibilities Among Ecosystem Services

T2 - Biological, Physical and Economic Drivers of Multifunctionality

AU - Butterfield, Bradley J.

AU - Camhi, Ashley L.

AU - Rubin, Rachel L.

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Balancing the joint production of multiple ecosystem services, also referred to as the 'multifunctionality' of an ecosystem or landscape, requires understanding of the ecological processes that produce and economic processes that evaluate those services. Here, we review the ecological tradeoffs and compatibilities among ecosystem processes that influence ecosystem multifunctionality with respect to ecosystem services, including variation in functional strategies, constraints on community assembly and direct effects of the abiotic environment. We then review how different valuation methods may alter the magnitude of tradeoffs and compatibilities in monetary terms. Among communities, functional diversity increases ecosystem multifunctionality, but community-average trait values are emerging as important drivers of ecosystem services with greater potential to produce tradeoffs when compared to functional diversity. However, research that links organismal functional strategies to community assembly rules in real, heterogeneous landscapes demonstrate that predictable tradeoffs among species do not consistently scale up to the community level, necessitating further research on trait-based community assembly in order to develop general predictive models of biotic effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Abiotic factors are frequently incorporated into mapping assessments of multifunctionality, but the emergent tradeoffs and compatibilities in ecosystem services driven by those factors are rarely assessed, despite a number of studies that have demonstrated their clear importance in ecosystem multifunctionality. Finally, while a variety of valuation methods are used to quantify the joint production of ecosystem services, only provisioning services are typically directly valued and assumed to have fixed correlations with other ecosystem services that can lead to inaccurate valuation, and potentially inappropriate prioritisation, of multiple ecosystem services.

AB - Balancing the joint production of multiple ecosystem services, also referred to as the 'multifunctionality' of an ecosystem or landscape, requires understanding of the ecological processes that produce and economic processes that evaluate those services. Here, we review the ecological tradeoffs and compatibilities among ecosystem processes that influence ecosystem multifunctionality with respect to ecosystem services, including variation in functional strategies, constraints on community assembly and direct effects of the abiotic environment. We then review how different valuation methods may alter the magnitude of tradeoffs and compatibilities in monetary terms. Among communities, functional diversity increases ecosystem multifunctionality, but community-average trait values are emerging as important drivers of ecosystem services with greater potential to produce tradeoffs when compared to functional diversity. However, research that links organismal functional strategies to community assembly rules in real, heterogeneous landscapes demonstrate that predictable tradeoffs among species do not consistently scale up to the community level, necessitating further research on trait-based community assembly in order to develop general predictive models of biotic effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Abiotic factors are frequently incorporated into mapping assessments of multifunctionality, but the emergent tradeoffs and compatibilities in ecosystem services driven by those factors are rarely assessed, despite a number of studies that have demonstrated their clear importance in ecosystem multifunctionality. Finally, while a variety of valuation methods are used to quantify the joint production of ecosystem services, only provisioning services are typically directly valued and assumed to have fixed correlations with other ecosystem services that can lead to inaccurate valuation, and potentially inappropriate prioritisation, of multiple ecosystem services.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Community assembly

KW - Functional diversity

KW - Joint production function

KW - Mass-ratio hypothesis

KW - Multifunctional landscape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956486265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956486265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.002

DO - 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956486265

JO - Advances in Ecological Research

JF - Advances in Ecological Research

SN - 0065-2504

ER -