Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models

Christopher R. Schwalm; Deborah N. Huntzinger; Joshua B. Fisher; Anna M. Michalak; Kevin Bowman; Philippe Ciais; Robert Cook; Bassil El-Masri; Daniel Hayes; Maoyi Huang; Akihiko Ito; Atul Jain; Anthony W. King; Huimin Lei; Junjie Liu; Chaoqun Lu; Jiafu Mao; Shushi Peng; Benjamin Poulter; Daniel Ricciuto; Kevin Schaefer; Xiaoying Shi; Bo Tao; Hanqin Tian; Weile Wang; Yaxing Wei; Jia Yang; Ning Zeng

doi:10.1002/2015GL064002

Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models

Christopher R. Schwalm, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Joshua B. Fisher, Anna M. Michalak, Kevin Bowman, Philippe Ciais, Robert Cook, Bassil El-Masri, Daniel Hayes, Maoyi Huang, Akihiko Ito, Atul Jain, Anthony W. King, Huimin Lei, Junjie Liu, Chaoqun Lu, Jiafu Mao, Shushi Peng, Benjamin Poulter, Daniel RicciutoKevin Schaefer, Xiaoying Shi, Bo Tao, Hanqin Tian, Weile Wang, Yaxing Wei, Jia Yang, Ning Zeng

Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, School of

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multimodel ensembles (MME) are commonplace in Earth system modeling. Here we perform MME integration using a 10-member ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) from the Multiscale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). We contrast optimal (skill based for present-day carbon cycling) versus naïve ("one model-one vote") integration. MsTMIP optimal and naïve mean land sink strength estimates (-1.16 versus -1.15 Pg C per annum respectively) are statistically indistinguishable. This holds also for grid cell values and extends to gross uptake, biomass, and net ecosystem productivity. TBM skill is similarly indistinguishable. The added complexity of skill-based integration does not materially change MME values. This suggests that carbon metabolism has predictability limits and/or that all models and references are misspecified. Resolving this issue requires addressing specific uncertainty types (initial conditions, structure, and references) and a change in model development paradigms currently dominant in the TBM community.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	4418-4428
Number of pages	11
Journal	Geophysical Research Letters
Volume	42
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064002
State	Published - Jun 16 2015

Keywords

carbon cycle
model integration
modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geophysics
Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Access to Document

10.1002/2015GL064002

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Schwalm, C. R., Huntzinger, D. N., Fisher, J. B., Michalak, A. M., Bowman, K., Ciais, P., Cook, R., El-Masri, B., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A., King, A. W., Lei, H., Liu, J., Lu, C., Mao, J., Peng, S., Poulter, B., ... Zeng, N. (2015). Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(11), 4418-4428. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064002

Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models. / Schwalm, Christopher R.; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Fisher, Joshua B.; Michalak, Anna M.; Bowman, Kevin; Ciais, Philippe; Cook, Robert; El-Masri, Bassil; Hayes, Daniel; Huang, Maoyi; Ito, Akihiko; Jain, Atul; King, Anthony W.; Lei, Huimin; Liu, Junjie; Lu, Chaoqun; Mao, Jiafu; Peng, Shushi; Poulter, Benjamin; Ricciuto, Daniel; Schaefer, Kevin; Shi, Xiaoying; Tao, Bo; Tian, Hanqin; Wang, Weile; Wei, Yaxing; Yang, Jia; Zeng, Ning.

In: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, No. 11, 16.06.2015, p. 4418-4428.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Schwalm, CR , Huntzinger, DN, Fisher, JB, Michalak, AM, Bowman, K, Ciais, P, Cook, R, El-Masri, B, Hayes, D, Huang, M, Ito, A, Jain, A, King, AW, Lei, H, Liu, J, Lu, C, Mao, J, Peng, S, Poulter, B, Ricciuto, D, Schaefer, K, Shi, X, Tao, B, Tian, H, Wang, W, Wei, Y, Yang, J & Zeng, N 2015, 'Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models', Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 4418-4428. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064002

Schwalm, Christopher R. ; Huntzinger, Deborah N. ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; Michalak, Anna M. ; Bowman, Kevin ; Ciais, Philippe ; Cook, Robert ; El-Masri, Bassil ; Hayes, Daniel ; Huang, Maoyi ; Ito, Akihiko ; Jain, Atul ; King, Anthony W. ; Lei, Huimin ; Liu, Junjie ; Lu, Chaoqun ; Mao, Jiafu ; Peng, Shushi ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Ricciuto, Daniel ; Schaefer, Kevin ; Shi, Xiaoying ; Tao, Bo ; Tian, Hanqin ; Wang, Weile ; Wei, Yaxing ; Yang, Jia ; Zeng, Ning. / Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models. In: Geophysical Research Letters. 2015 ; Vol. 42, No. 11. pp. 4418-4428.

@article{9c773c9b95e9434da7a7900b7545f192,

title = "Toward {"}optimal{"} integration of terrestrial biosphere models",

abstract = "Multimodel ensembles (MME) are commonplace in Earth system modeling. Here we perform MME integration using a 10-member ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) from the Multiscale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). We contrast optimal (skill based for present-day carbon cycling) versus na{\"i}ve ({"}one model-one vote{"}) integration. MsTMIP optimal and na{\"i}ve mean land sink strength estimates (-1.16 versus -1.15 Pg C per annum respectively) are statistically indistinguishable. This holds also for grid cell values and extends to gross uptake, biomass, and net ecosystem productivity. TBM skill is similarly indistinguishable. The added complexity of skill-based integration does not materially change MME values. This suggests that carbon metabolism has predictability limits and/or that all models and references are misspecified. Resolving this issue requires addressing specific uncertainty types (initial conditions, structure, and references) and a change in model development paradigms currently dominant in the TBM community.",

keywords = "carbon cycle, model integration, modeling",

author = "Schwalm, {Christopher R.} and Huntzinger, {Deborah N.} and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and Michalak, {Anna M.} and Kevin Bowman and Philippe Ciais and Robert Cook and Bassil El-Masri and Daniel Hayes and Maoyi Huang and Akihiko Ito and Atul Jain and King, {Anthony W.} and Huimin Lei and Junjie Liu and Chaoqun Lu and Jiafu Mao and Shushi Peng and Benjamin Poulter and Daniel Ricciuto and Kevin Schaefer and Xiaoying Shi and Bo Tao and Hanqin Tian and Weile Wang and Yaxing Wei and Jia Yang and Ning Zeng",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1002/2015GL064002",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "42",

pages = "4418--4428",

journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",

issn = "0094-8276",

publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward "optimal" integration of terrestrial biosphere models

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R.

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N.

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

AU - Bowman, Kevin

AU - Ciais, Philippe

AU - Cook, Robert

AU - El-Masri, Bassil

AU - Hayes, Daniel

AU - Huang, Maoyi

AU - Ito, Akihiko

AU - Jain, Atul

AU - King, Anthony W.

AU - Lei, Huimin

AU - Liu, Junjie

AU - Lu, Chaoqun

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Peng, Shushi

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Ricciuto, Daniel

AU - Schaefer, Kevin

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Tao, Bo

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Wang, Weile

AU - Wei, Yaxing

AU - Yang, Jia

AU - Zeng, Ning

PY - 2015/6/16

Y1 - 2015/6/16

N2 - Multimodel ensembles (MME) are commonplace in Earth system modeling. Here we perform MME integration using a 10-member ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) from the Multiscale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). We contrast optimal (skill based for present-day carbon cycling) versus naïve ("one model-one vote") integration. MsTMIP optimal and naïve mean land sink strength estimates (-1.16 versus -1.15 Pg C per annum respectively) are statistically indistinguishable. This holds also for grid cell values and extends to gross uptake, biomass, and net ecosystem productivity. TBM skill is similarly indistinguishable. The added complexity of skill-based integration does not materially change MME values. This suggests that carbon metabolism has predictability limits and/or that all models and references are misspecified. Resolving this issue requires addressing specific uncertainty types (initial conditions, structure, and references) and a change in model development paradigms currently dominant in the TBM community.

AB - Multimodel ensembles (MME) are commonplace in Earth system modeling. Here we perform MME integration using a 10-member ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) from the Multiscale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). We contrast optimal (skill based for present-day carbon cycling) versus naïve ("one model-one vote") integration. MsTMIP optimal and naïve mean land sink strength estimates (-1.16 versus -1.15 Pg C per annum respectively) are statistically indistinguishable. This holds also for grid cell values and extends to gross uptake, biomass, and net ecosystem productivity. TBM skill is similarly indistinguishable. The added complexity of skill-based integration does not materially change MME values. This suggests that carbon metabolism has predictability limits and/or that all models and references are misspecified. Resolving this issue requires addressing specific uncertainty types (initial conditions, structure, and references) and a change in model development paradigms currently dominant in the TBM community.

KW - carbon cycle

KW - model integration

KW - modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934439686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934439686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2015GL064002

DO - 10.1002/2015GL064002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84934439686

VL - 42

SP - 4418

EP - 4428

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 11

ER -