Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites

Joseph E. Hazel, Matt Kaplinski, Roderic A Parnell, Mark F Manone, Alan Dale

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study documents the geomorphic response to the 1996 controlled flood of 33 study sites in fan-eddy complexes distributed throughout Grand Canyon. Repeated topographic mapping was used to quantify sediment redistribution at sites within three distinct parts of the fan-eddy complex: high-elevation sand bars, submerged areas of the recirculation zone (eddy), and the adjacent main channel. The topographic data show that the 1996 controlled flood rebuilt previously eroded high-elevation bars, regardless of location, bar type, or width of the canyon. The average thickness of new, high-elevation deposits was 0.64 m. Because there was an average thickness decrease in the main channel of 0.45 m, we conclude that large volumes of sediment were scoured from storage locations on the bed. Although there was variability between the behaviors of individual sites, two response styles were identified: (1) deposition filled or nearly filled all areas of small recirculation zones, and (2) extensive low-elevation scour caused net erosion in large recirculation zones. The average recirculation zone change at all sites was net aggradation. Aggradation was greatest in narrow reaches where stage change was greatest. The magnitude of deposition was greatest in the Marble Canyon reach between the Paria River and the Little Colorado River. Sites located downstream from the Little Colorado River still remained partly filled with sediment by the 1993 Little Colorado River floods so the potential for bar filling was limited compared to the sites located upstream. Our results suggest that the amount of high-elevation deposition is in part controlled by the space available for deposition in the recirculation zone before the flood, which we term “accommodation space.” Erosion rates of newly-deposited sand were initially high following the 1996 controlled flood but decreased with time. Our results show that controlled flooding restores eroded bars downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, and produces sand volume increases in bar storage that are at least partially maintained for nearly a year afterward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
Pages161-183
Number of pages23
Volume110
ISBN (Electronic)9781118664711
ISBN (Print)9780875900933
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Publication series

NameGeophysical Monograph Series
Volume110
ISSN (Print)0065-8448
ISSN (Electronic)2328-8779

Fingerprint

Colorado River (North America)
canyon
canyons
sands
eddy
sediments
aggradation
vortices
fans
river
erosion
sand
Grand Canyon (AZ)
sediment
topographic mapping
dams
accommodation
scour
erosion rate
marble

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Cite this

Hazel, J. E., Kaplinski, M., Parnell, R. A., Manone, M. F., & Dale, A. (1999). Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites. In The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999 (Vol. 110, pp. 161-183). (Geophysical Monograph Series; Vol. 110). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM110p0161

Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites. / Hazel, Joseph E.; Kaplinski, Matt; Parnell, Roderic A; Manone, Mark F; Dale, Alan.

The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999. Vol. 110 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1999. p. 161-183 (Geophysical Monograph Series; Vol. 110).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hazel, JE, Kaplinski, M, Parnell, RA, Manone, MF & Dale, A 1999, Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites. in The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999. vol. 110, Geophysical Monograph Series, vol. 110, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM110p0161
Hazel JE, Kaplinski M, Parnell RA, Manone MF, Dale A. Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites. In The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999. Vol. 110. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 1999. p. 161-183. (Geophysical Monograph Series). https://doi.org/10.1029/GM110p0161
Hazel, Joseph E. ; Kaplinski, Matt ; Parnell, Roderic A ; Manone, Mark F ; Dale, Alan. / Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites. The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999. Vol. 110 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1999. pp. 161-183 (Geophysical Monograph Series).
@inbook{2a7d76458a1746db86d96e1ff3cc9d89,
title = "Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites",
abstract = "This study documents the geomorphic response to the 1996 controlled flood of 33 study sites in fan-eddy complexes distributed throughout Grand Canyon. Repeated topographic mapping was used to quantify sediment redistribution at sites within three distinct parts of the fan-eddy complex: high-elevation sand bars, submerged areas of the recirculation zone (eddy), and the adjacent main channel. The topographic data show that the 1996 controlled flood rebuilt previously eroded high-elevation bars, regardless of location, bar type, or width of the canyon. The average thickness of new, high-elevation deposits was 0.64 m. Because there was an average thickness decrease in the main channel of 0.45 m, we conclude that large volumes of sediment were scoured from storage locations on the bed. Although there was variability between the behaviors of individual sites, two response styles were identified: (1) deposition filled or nearly filled all areas of small recirculation zones, and (2) extensive low-elevation scour caused net erosion in large recirculation zones. The average recirculation zone change at all sites was net aggradation. Aggradation was greatest in narrow reaches where stage change was greatest. The magnitude of deposition was greatest in the Marble Canyon reach between the Paria River and the Little Colorado River. Sites located downstream from the Little Colorado River still remained partly filled with sediment by the 1993 Little Colorado River floods so the potential for bar filling was limited compared to the sites located upstream. Our results suggest that the amount of high-elevation deposition is in part controlled by the space available for deposition in the recirculation zone before the flood, which we term “accommodation space.” Erosion rates of newly-deposited sand were initially high following the 1996 controlled flood but decreased with time. Our results show that controlled flooding restores eroded bars downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, and produces sand volume increases in bar storage that are at least partially maintained for nearly a year afterward.",
author = "Hazel, {Joseph E.} and Matt Kaplinski and Parnell, {Roderic A} and Manone, {Mark F} and Alan Dale",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/GM110p0161",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780875900933",
volume = "110",
series = "Geophysical Monograph Series",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
pages = "161--183",
booktitle = "The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Topographic and bathymetric changes at thirty-three long-term study sites

AU - Hazel, Joseph E.

AU - Kaplinski, Matt

AU - Parnell, Roderic A

AU - Manone, Mark F

AU - Dale, Alan

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - This study documents the geomorphic response to the 1996 controlled flood of 33 study sites in fan-eddy complexes distributed throughout Grand Canyon. Repeated topographic mapping was used to quantify sediment redistribution at sites within three distinct parts of the fan-eddy complex: high-elevation sand bars, submerged areas of the recirculation zone (eddy), and the adjacent main channel. The topographic data show that the 1996 controlled flood rebuilt previously eroded high-elevation bars, regardless of location, bar type, or width of the canyon. The average thickness of new, high-elevation deposits was 0.64 m. Because there was an average thickness decrease in the main channel of 0.45 m, we conclude that large volumes of sediment were scoured from storage locations on the bed. Although there was variability between the behaviors of individual sites, two response styles were identified: (1) deposition filled or nearly filled all areas of small recirculation zones, and (2) extensive low-elevation scour caused net erosion in large recirculation zones. The average recirculation zone change at all sites was net aggradation. Aggradation was greatest in narrow reaches where stage change was greatest. The magnitude of deposition was greatest in the Marble Canyon reach between the Paria River and the Little Colorado River. Sites located downstream from the Little Colorado River still remained partly filled with sediment by the 1993 Little Colorado River floods so the potential for bar filling was limited compared to the sites located upstream. Our results suggest that the amount of high-elevation deposition is in part controlled by the space available for deposition in the recirculation zone before the flood, which we term “accommodation space.” Erosion rates of newly-deposited sand were initially high following the 1996 controlled flood but decreased with time. Our results show that controlled flooding restores eroded bars downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, and produces sand volume increases in bar storage that are at least partially maintained for nearly a year afterward.

AB - This study documents the geomorphic response to the 1996 controlled flood of 33 study sites in fan-eddy complexes distributed throughout Grand Canyon. Repeated topographic mapping was used to quantify sediment redistribution at sites within three distinct parts of the fan-eddy complex: high-elevation sand bars, submerged areas of the recirculation zone (eddy), and the adjacent main channel. The topographic data show that the 1996 controlled flood rebuilt previously eroded high-elevation bars, regardless of location, bar type, or width of the canyon. The average thickness of new, high-elevation deposits was 0.64 m. Because there was an average thickness decrease in the main channel of 0.45 m, we conclude that large volumes of sediment were scoured from storage locations on the bed. Although there was variability between the behaviors of individual sites, two response styles were identified: (1) deposition filled or nearly filled all areas of small recirculation zones, and (2) extensive low-elevation scour caused net erosion in large recirculation zones. The average recirculation zone change at all sites was net aggradation. Aggradation was greatest in narrow reaches where stage change was greatest. The magnitude of deposition was greatest in the Marble Canyon reach between the Paria River and the Little Colorado River. Sites located downstream from the Little Colorado River still remained partly filled with sediment by the 1993 Little Colorado River floods so the potential for bar filling was limited compared to the sites located upstream. Our results suggest that the amount of high-elevation deposition is in part controlled by the space available for deposition in the recirculation zone before the flood, which we term “accommodation space.” Erosion rates of newly-deposited sand were initially high following the 1996 controlled flood but decreased with time. Our results show that controlled flooding restores eroded bars downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, and produces sand volume increases in bar storage that are at least partially maintained for nearly a year afterward.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004819696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004819696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/GM110p0161

DO - 10.1029/GM110p0161

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:0004819696

SN - 9780875900933

VL - 110

T3 - Geophysical Monograph Series

SP - 161

EP - 183

BT - The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon, 1999

PB - Blackwell Publishing Ltd

ER -