Time series versus cross-sectionally derived predictions of future cash flows

Kenneth S Lorek, G. Lee Willinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We refine the analysis of annual cash-flow prediction models originally developed and tested by Dechow et al. (1998), Barth et al. (2001) and Kim and Kross (2005) using cash flow from operations data reported in accordance with FASB Standard No. 95 for a constant sample of 1111 firms. We estimated annual cash-flow prediction models both cross-sectionally and on a time-series basis to assess whether restricting firm-specific parameter estimation in the cross-sectional approach adversely affects predictive performance. Predictive ability is assessed via "out-of-sample" forecasts in an inter-temporal holdout period (2001-2005) not used in model estimation. We provide new evidence that significantly greater enhancement to predictive performance is obtained when cash-flow prediction models are estimated on a time-series basis versus cross-sectionally. These inferences are robust across one-year ahead cash-flow predictions or one-thru-five-year ahead predictions. We find that the relative accuracy of cash-flow predictions is unaffected by whether the aforementioned prediction models employ cash flows or net earnings as independent variables. Finally, we also provide evidence that the predictive ability of cash flows is highly sensitive to firm size. That is, relatively larger firms provide significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than those of smaller firms across cash-flow prediction models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-36
Number of pages8
JournalAdvances in Accounting
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Cash flow prediction
Prediction
Cash flow
Prediction model
Predictive ability
Small firms
Inference
Large firms
Parameter estimation
Firm size
Out-of-sample forecasting
Enhancement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance

Cite this

Time series versus cross-sectionally derived predictions of future cash flows. / Lorek, Kenneth S; Willinger, G. Lee.

In: Advances in Accounting, Vol. 26, No. 1, 06.2010, p. 29-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce4acebe97de48a389407779f357df85,
title = "Time series versus cross-sectionally derived predictions of future cash flows",
abstract = "We refine the analysis of annual cash-flow prediction models originally developed and tested by Dechow et al. (1998), Barth et al. (2001) and Kim and Kross (2005) using cash flow from operations data reported in accordance with FASB Standard No. 95 for a constant sample of 1111 firms. We estimated annual cash-flow prediction models both cross-sectionally and on a time-series basis to assess whether restricting firm-specific parameter estimation in the cross-sectional approach adversely affects predictive performance. Predictive ability is assessed via {"}out-of-sample{"} forecasts in an inter-temporal holdout period (2001-2005) not used in model estimation. We provide new evidence that significantly greater enhancement to predictive performance is obtained when cash-flow prediction models are estimated on a time-series basis versus cross-sectionally. These inferences are robust across one-year ahead cash-flow predictions or one-thru-five-year ahead predictions. We find that the relative accuracy of cash-flow predictions is unaffected by whether the aforementioned prediction models employ cash flows or net earnings as independent variables. Finally, we also provide evidence that the predictive ability of cash flows is highly sensitive to firm size. That is, relatively larger firms provide significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than those of smaller firms across cash-flow prediction models.",
author = "Lorek, {Kenneth S} and Willinger, {G. Lee}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.adiac.2009.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "29--36",
journal = "Advances in Accounting",
issn = "0882-6110",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time series versus cross-sectionally derived predictions of future cash flows

AU - Lorek, Kenneth S

AU - Willinger, G. Lee

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - We refine the analysis of annual cash-flow prediction models originally developed and tested by Dechow et al. (1998), Barth et al. (2001) and Kim and Kross (2005) using cash flow from operations data reported in accordance with FASB Standard No. 95 for a constant sample of 1111 firms. We estimated annual cash-flow prediction models both cross-sectionally and on a time-series basis to assess whether restricting firm-specific parameter estimation in the cross-sectional approach adversely affects predictive performance. Predictive ability is assessed via "out-of-sample" forecasts in an inter-temporal holdout period (2001-2005) not used in model estimation. We provide new evidence that significantly greater enhancement to predictive performance is obtained when cash-flow prediction models are estimated on a time-series basis versus cross-sectionally. These inferences are robust across one-year ahead cash-flow predictions or one-thru-five-year ahead predictions. We find that the relative accuracy of cash-flow predictions is unaffected by whether the aforementioned prediction models employ cash flows or net earnings as independent variables. Finally, we also provide evidence that the predictive ability of cash flows is highly sensitive to firm size. That is, relatively larger firms provide significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than those of smaller firms across cash-flow prediction models.

AB - We refine the analysis of annual cash-flow prediction models originally developed and tested by Dechow et al. (1998), Barth et al. (2001) and Kim and Kross (2005) using cash flow from operations data reported in accordance with FASB Standard No. 95 for a constant sample of 1111 firms. We estimated annual cash-flow prediction models both cross-sectionally and on a time-series basis to assess whether restricting firm-specific parameter estimation in the cross-sectional approach adversely affects predictive performance. Predictive ability is assessed via "out-of-sample" forecasts in an inter-temporal holdout period (2001-2005) not used in model estimation. We provide new evidence that significantly greater enhancement to predictive performance is obtained when cash-flow prediction models are estimated on a time-series basis versus cross-sectionally. These inferences are robust across one-year ahead cash-flow predictions or one-thru-five-year ahead predictions. We find that the relative accuracy of cash-flow predictions is unaffected by whether the aforementioned prediction models employ cash flows or net earnings as independent variables. Finally, we also provide evidence that the predictive ability of cash flows is highly sensitive to firm size. That is, relatively larger firms provide significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than those of smaller firms across cash-flow prediction models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952583109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952583109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.adiac.2009.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.adiac.2009.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 29

EP - 36

JO - Advances in Accounting

JF - Advances in Accounting

SN - 0882-6110

IS - 1

ER -