Tidal constraints on the masses of extrasolar planets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tidal theory predicts that the orbits of close extrasolar giant planets will circularize on timescales that can be comparable to the ages of those systems. Additionally, planets that are close enough and massive enough can spin up their central stars. Since the eccentricities of extrasolar planet orbits are determined by the radial velocity technique and since stellar rotation rates are observed, or at least derived, limits on the masses of close extrasolar planets can be placed. We find upper limits on the masses of eight extrasolar planets, including limiting the masses of v And b, HD 75289b, HD 187123b, and 51 Peg b to less than 1.48, 1.21, 0.59, and 0.51 Jupiter masses, respectively. There is a contradiction in the constrained mass of HD 217107b, in that its eccentricity is apparently too high. This anomalously high eccentricity could be real and caused by other planets in that system; or it could be an artifact of fitting a one-orbit solution to multiplanet data. The tidal limits placed on all these extrasolar planets are only as good as the knowledge of the stellar parameters (age, rotation period), which in some cases is not very good; better detailed knowledge of stars hosting planets will be necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume537
Issue number1 PART 2
StatePublished - Jul 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

extrasolar planets
planet
planets
eccentricity
orbits
stellar rotation
stars
Jupiter (planet)
radial velocity
artifacts
Jupiter
artifact
timescale

Keywords

  • Celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics
  • Planetary systems
  • Solar system: formation
  • Solar system: general
  • Stars: individual (Gliese 86, HD 75289, HD 130322, HD 187123, HD 192263, HD 195019, HD 217107, v Andromedae, 51 Pegasi)
  • Stars: rotation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Tidal constraints on the masses of extrasolar planets. / Trilling, David E.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 537, No. 1 PART 2, 01.07.2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8147ef1aa06640c083a7431477c5ca77,
title = "Tidal constraints on the masses of extrasolar planets",
abstract = "Tidal theory predicts that the orbits of close extrasolar giant planets will circularize on timescales that can be comparable to the ages of those systems. Additionally, planets that are close enough and massive enough can spin up their central stars. Since the eccentricities of extrasolar planet orbits are determined by the radial velocity technique and since stellar rotation rates are observed, or at least derived, limits on the masses of close extrasolar planets can be placed. We find upper limits on the masses of eight extrasolar planets, including limiting the masses of v And b, HD 75289b, HD 187123b, and 51 Peg b to less than 1.48, 1.21, 0.59, and 0.51 Jupiter masses, respectively. There is a contradiction in the constrained mass of HD 217107b, in that its eccentricity is apparently too high. This anomalously high eccentricity could be real and caused by other planets in that system; or it could be an artifact of fitting a one-orbit solution to multiplanet data. The tidal limits placed on all these extrasolar planets are only as good as the knowledge of the stellar parameters (age, rotation period), which in some cases is not very good; better detailed knowledge of stars hosting planets will be necessary.",
keywords = "Celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics, Planetary systems, Solar system: formation, Solar system: general, Stars: individual (Gliese 86, HD 75289, HD 130322, HD 187123, HD 192263, HD 195019, HD 217107, v Andromedae, 51 Pegasi), Stars: rotation",
author = "Trilling, {David E}",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "537",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1 PART 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tidal constraints on the masses of extrasolar planets

AU - Trilling, David E

PY - 2000/7/1

Y1 - 2000/7/1

N2 - Tidal theory predicts that the orbits of close extrasolar giant planets will circularize on timescales that can be comparable to the ages of those systems. Additionally, planets that are close enough and massive enough can spin up their central stars. Since the eccentricities of extrasolar planet orbits are determined by the radial velocity technique and since stellar rotation rates are observed, or at least derived, limits on the masses of close extrasolar planets can be placed. We find upper limits on the masses of eight extrasolar planets, including limiting the masses of v And b, HD 75289b, HD 187123b, and 51 Peg b to less than 1.48, 1.21, 0.59, and 0.51 Jupiter masses, respectively. There is a contradiction in the constrained mass of HD 217107b, in that its eccentricity is apparently too high. This anomalously high eccentricity could be real and caused by other planets in that system; or it could be an artifact of fitting a one-orbit solution to multiplanet data. The tidal limits placed on all these extrasolar planets are only as good as the knowledge of the stellar parameters (age, rotation period), which in some cases is not very good; better detailed knowledge of stars hosting planets will be necessary.

AB - Tidal theory predicts that the orbits of close extrasolar giant planets will circularize on timescales that can be comparable to the ages of those systems. Additionally, planets that are close enough and massive enough can spin up their central stars. Since the eccentricities of extrasolar planet orbits are determined by the radial velocity technique and since stellar rotation rates are observed, or at least derived, limits on the masses of close extrasolar planets can be placed. We find upper limits on the masses of eight extrasolar planets, including limiting the masses of v And b, HD 75289b, HD 187123b, and 51 Peg b to less than 1.48, 1.21, 0.59, and 0.51 Jupiter masses, respectively. There is a contradiction in the constrained mass of HD 217107b, in that its eccentricity is apparently too high. This anomalously high eccentricity could be real and caused by other planets in that system; or it could be an artifact of fitting a one-orbit solution to multiplanet data. The tidal limits placed on all these extrasolar planets are only as good as the knowledge of the stellar parameters (age, rotation period), which in some cases is not very good; better detailed knowledge of stars hosting planets will be necessary.

KW - Celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics

KW - Planetary systems

KW - Solar system: formation

KW - Solar system: general

KW - Stars: individual (Gliese 86, HD 75289, HD 130322, HD 187123, HD 192263, HD 195019, HD 217107, v Andromedae, 51 Pegasi)

KW - Stars: rotation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034214593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034214593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034214593

VL - 537

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1 PART 2

ER -