The utility of continuous atmospheric measurements for identifying biospheric CO2 flux variability

Deborah N Huntzinger, Sharon M. Gourdji, Kimberly L. Mueller, Anna M. Michalak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motivated by the need to improve the modeling of land-atmosphere carbon exchange, this study examines the extent to which continuous atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) observations can be used to evaluate flux variability at regional scales. The net ecosystem exchange estimates of four terrestrial biospheric models (TBMs) are used to represent plausible scenarios of surface flux distributions, which are compared in terms of their resulting atmospheric signals. The analysis focuses on North America using the nine towers of the continuous observation network that were operational in 2004. Four test cases are designed to isolate the influence on the atmospheric observations of (1) overall flux differences, (2) magnitude differences in flux across large regions, (3) differences in the flux patterns within ecoregions, and (4) flux variability in the near and far field of observation locations. The CO 2 signals generated from the different representations of surface flux distribution are compared using a Chi-square test of variance. Differences found to be significant are driven primarily by differences in flux magnitude over large scales, and the fine-scale (primarily temporal) variability of fluxes within the near field of observation locations. Differences in the spatial distribution of fluxes within individual ecoregions, on the other hand, do not translate into significant differences in the observed signals at the towers. Thus, given the types of variation in flux represented by the four TBMs, the atmospheric data may be most informative in the evaluation of aggregated fluxes over large spatial scales (e.g., ecoregions), as well as in the improvement of how the diurnal cycle of fluxes is represented in TBMs, particularly in areas close to tower locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberD06110
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research E: Planets
Volume116
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biospherics
ecoregion
ecoregions
carbon dioxide
surface flux
Fluxes
net ecosystem exchange
towers
spatial distribution
Towers
atmosphere
carbon
modeling
near fields
test
distribution
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

The utility of continuous atmospheric measurements for identifying biospheric CO2 flux variability. / Huntzinger, Deborah N; Gourdji, Sharon M.; Mueller, Kimberly L.; Michalak, Anna M.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research E: Planets, Vol. 116, No. 6, D06110, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d746801577f40279e316a18c93e0f4e,
title = "The utility of continuous atmospheric measurements for identifying biospheric CO2 flux variability",
abstract = "Motivated by the need to improve the modeling of land-atmosphere carbon exchange, this study examines the extent to which continuous atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) observations can be used to evaluate flux variability at regional scales. The net ecosystem exchange estimates of four terrestrial biospheric models (TBMs) are used to represent plausible scenarios of surface flux distributions, which are compared in terms of their resulting atmospheric signals. The analysis focuses on North America using the nine towers of the continuous observation network that were operational in 2004. Four test cases are designed to isolate the influence on the atmospheric observations of (1) overall flux differences, (2) magnitude differences in flux across large regions, (3) differences in the flux patterns within ecoregions, and (4) flux variability in the near and far field of observation locations. The CO 2 signals generated from the different representations of surface flux distribution are compared using a Chi-square test of variance. Differences found to be significant are driven primarily by differences in flux magnitude over large scales, and the fine-scale (primarily temporal) variability of fluxes within the near field of observation locations. Differences in the spatial distribution of fluxes within individual ecoregions, on the other hand, do not translate into significant differences in the observed signals at the towers. Thus, given the types of variation in flux represented by the four TBMs, the atmospheric data may be most informative in the evaluation of aggregated fluxes over large spatial scales (e.g., ecoregions), as well as in the improvement of how the diurnal cycle of fluxes is represented in TBMs, particularly in areas close to tower locations.",
author = "Huntzinger, {Deborah N} and Gourdji, {Sharon M.} and Mueller, {Kimberly L.} and Michalak, {Anna M.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1029/2010JD015048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of continuous atmospheric measurements for identifying biospheric CO2 flux variability

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N

AU - Gourdji, Sharon M.

AU - Mueller, Kimberly L.

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Motivated by the need to improve the modeling of land-atmosphere carbon exchange, this study examines the extent to which continuous atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) observations can be used to evaluate flux variability at regional scales. The net ecosystem exchange estimates of four terrestrial biospheric models (TBMs) are used to represent plausible scenarios of surface flux distributions, which are compared in terms of their resulting atmospheric signals. The analysis focuses on North America using the nine towers of the continuous observation network that were operational in 2004. Four test cases are designed to isolate the influence on the atmospheric observations of (1) overall flux differences, (2) magnitude differences in flux across large regions, (3) differences in the flux patterns within ecoregions, and (4) flux variability in the near and far field of observation locations. The CO 2 signals generated from the different representations of surface flux distribution are compared using a Chi-square test of variance. Differences found to be significant are driven primarily by differences in flux magnitude over large scales, and the fine-scale (primarily temporal) variability of fluxes within the near field of observation locations. Differences in the spatial distribution of fluxes within individual ecoregions, on the other hand, do not translate into significant differences in the observed signals at the towers. Thus, given the types of variation in flux represented by the four TBMs, the atmospheric data may be most informative in the evaluation of aggregated fluxes over large spatial scales (e.g., ecoregions), as well as in the improvement of how the diurnal cycle of fluxes is represented in TBMs, particularly in areas close to tower locations.

AB - Motivated by the need to improve the modeling of land-atmosphere carbon exchange, this study examines the extent to which continuous atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) observations can be used to evaluate flux variability at regional scales. The net ecosystem exchange estimates of four terrestrial biospheric models (TBMs) are used to represent plausible scenarios of surface flux distributions, which are compared in terms of their resulting atmospheric signals. The analysis focuses on North America using the nine towers of the continuous observation network that were operational in 2004. Four test cases are designed to isolate the influence on the atmospheric observations of (1) overall flux differences, (2) magnitude differences in flux across large regions, (3) differences in the flux patterns within ecoregions, and (4) flux variability in the near and far field of observation locations. The CO 2 signals generated from the different representations of surface flux distribution are compared using a Chi-square test of variance. Differences found to be significant are driven primarily by differences in flux magnitude over large scales, and the fine-scale (primarily temporal) variability of fluxes within the near field of observation locations. Differences in the spatial distribution of fluxes within individual ecoregions, on the other hand, do not translate into significant differences in the observed signals at the towers. Thus, given the types of variation in flux represented by the four TBMs, the atmospheric data may be most informative in the evaluation of aggregated fluxes over large spatial scales (e.g., ecoregions), as well as in the improvement of how the diurnal cycle of fluxes is represented in TBMs, particularly in areas close to tower locations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953236297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953236297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2010JD015048

DO - 10.1029/2010JD015048

M3 - Article

VL - 116

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 6

M1 - D06110

ER -