The soil priming effect: Consistent across ecosystems, elusive mechanisms

Xiao Jun Allen Liu, Brianna K. Finley, Rebecca L. Mau, Egbert Schwartz, Paul Dijkstra, Matthew A. Bowker, Bruce A. Hungate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Organic matter input to soils can accelerate the decomposition of native soil carbon (C), a process called the priming effect. Priming is ubiquitous and exhibits some consistent patterns, but a general explanation remains elusive, in part because of variation in the response across different ecosystems, and because of a diversity of proposed mechanisms, including microbial activation, stoichiometry, and community shifts. Here, we conducted five-week incubations of four soils (grassland, piñon-juniper, ponderosa pine, mixed conifer), varying the amount of substrate added (as 13C-glucose, either 350 or 1000 μg C g−1 week−1) and either with no added nitrogen (N), or with sufficient N (as NH4NO3) to bring the C-to-N ratio of the added substrate to 10. Using four different ecosystems enabled testing the generality of mechanisms underlying the priming effect. The responses of priming to the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate were consistent across ecosystems: priming increased with the rate of substrate addition and declined when the C-to-N ratio of the substrate was reduced. However, structural equation models failed to confirm intermediate responses postulated to mediate the priming effect, including responses postulated to be mediated by stoichiometry and microbial activation. Specifically, priming was not clearly associated with changes in microbial biomass or turnover, nor with extracellular enzyme activities or the microbial C-to-N ratio. The strongest explanatory pathways in the structural equation models were the substrate, soil, and C-to-N ratio treatments themselves, with no intermediates, suggesting that either these measurements lacked sufficient sensitivity to reveal causal relationships, or the actual drivers for priming were not included in the ancillary measurements. While we observed consistent changes in priming caused by the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate across a wide array of soils, our findings did not clearly conform to common models offered for the priming effect. Because priming is a residual flux involving diverse substrates of varying chemical composition, a simple and generalizable explanation of the phenomenon may be elusive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107617
JournalSoil Biology and Biochemistry
Volume140
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Ecosystem
Soil
substrate
ecosystems
ecosystem
stoichiometry
Structural Models
soil
Pinus ponderosa
Mesons
grassland soils
Juniperus
Coniferophyta
microbial biomass
conifers
soil organic matter
Biomass
chemical composition
enzyme activity
Nitrogen

Keywords

  • Carbon use efficiency
  • Microbial growth and respiration
  • Nutrient limitation
  • Soil carbon sequestration
  • Soil organic matter decomposition
  • Stable isotope tracer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Soil Science

Cite this

The soil priming effect : Consistent across ecosystems, elusive mechanisms. / Liu, Xiao Jun Allen; Finley, Brianna K.; Mau, Rebecca L.; Schwartz, Egbert; Dijkstra, Paul; Bowker, Matthew A.; Hungate, Bruce A.

In: Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Vol. 140, 107617, 01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a66ba3c2e6441269f1adcd3e562898e,
title = "The soil priming effect: Consistent across ecosystems, elusive mechanisms",
abstract = "Organic matter input to soils can accelerate the decomposition of native soil carbon (C), a process called the priming effect. Priming is ubiquitous and exhibits some consistent patterns, but a general explanation remains elusive, in part because of variation in the response across different ecosystems, and because of a diversity of proposed mechanisms, including microbial activation, stoichiometry, and community shifts. Here, we conducted five-week incubations of four soils (grassland, pi{\~n}on-juniper, ponderosa pine, mixed conifer), varying the amount of substrate added (as 13C-glucose, either 350 or 1000 μg C g−1 week−1) and either with no added nitrogen (N), or with sufficient N (as NH4NO3) to bring the C-to-N ratio of the added substrate to 10. Using four different ecosystems enabled testing the generality of mechanisms underlying the priming effect. The responses of priming to the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate were consistent across ecosystems: priming increased with the rate of substrate addition and declined when the C-to-N ratio of the substrate was reduced. However, structural equation models failed to confirm intermediate responses postulated to mediate the priming effect, including responses postulated to be mediated by stoichiometry and microbial activation. Specifically, priming was not clearly associated with changes in microbial biomass or turnover, nor with extracellular enzyme activities or the microbial C-to-N ratio. The strongest explanatory pathways in the structural equation models were the substrate, soil, and C-to-N ratio treatments themselves, with no intermediates, suggesting that either these measurements lacked sufficient sensitivity to reveal causal relationships, or the actual drivers for priming were not included in the ancillary measurements. While we observed consistent changes in priming caused by the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate across a wide array of soils, our findings did not clearly conform to common models offered for the priming effect. Because priming is a residual flux involving diverse substrates of varying chemical composition, a simple and generalizable explanation of the phenomenon may be elusive.",
keywords = "Carbon use efficiency, Microbial growth and respiration, Nutrient limitation, Soil carbon sequestration, Soil organic matter decomposition, Stable isotope tracer",
author = "Liu, {Xiao Jun Allen} and Finley, {Brianna K.} and Mau, {Rebecca L.} and Egbert Schwartz and Paul Dijkstra and Bowker, {Matthew A.} and Hungate, {Bruce A.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107617",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
journal = "Soil Biology and Biochemistry",
issn = "0038-0717",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The soil priming effect

T2 - Consistent across ecosystems, elusive mechanisms

AU - Liu, Xiao Jun Allen

AU - Finley, Brianna K.

AU - Mau, Rebecca L.

AU - Schwartz, Egbert

AU - Dijkstra, Paul

AU - Bowker, Matthew A.

AU - Hungate, Bruce A.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Organic matter input to soils can accelerate the decomposition of native soil carbon (C), a process called the priming effect. Priming is ubiquitous and exhibits some consistent patterns, but a general explanation remains elusive, in part because of variation in the response across different ecosystems, and because of a diversity of proposed mechanisms, including microbial activation, stoichiometry, and community shifts. Here, we conducted five-week incubations of four soils (grassland, piñon-juniper, ponderosa pine, mixed conifer), varying the amount of substrate added (as 13C-glucose, either 350 or 1000 μg C g−1 week−1) and either with no added nitrogen (N), or with sufficient N (as NH4NO3) to bring the C-to-N ratio of the added substrate to 10. Using four different ecosystems enabled testing the generality of mechanisms underlying the priming effect. The responses of priming to the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate were consistent across ecosystems: priming increased with the rate of substrate addition and declined when the C-to-N ratio of the substrate was reduced. However, structural equation models failed to confirm intermediate responses postulated to mediate the priming effect, including responses postulated to be mediated by stoichiometry and microbial activation. Specifically, priming was not clearly associated with changes in microbial biomass or turnover, nor with extracellular enzyme activities or the microbial C-to-N ratio. The strongest explanatory pathways in the structural equation models were the substrate, soil, and C-to-N ratio treatments themselves, with no intermediates, suggesting that either these measurements lacked sufficient sensitivity to reveal causal relationships, or the actual drivers for priming were not included in the ancillary measurements. While we observed consistent changes in priming caused by the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate across a wide array of soils, our findings did not clearly conform to common models offered for the priming effect. Because priming is a residual flux involving diverse substrates of varying chemical composition, a simple and generalizable explanation of the phenomenon may be elusive.

AB - Organic matter input to soils can accelerate the decomposition of native soil carbon (C), a process called the priming effect. Priming is ubiquitous and exhibits some consistent patterns, but a general explanation remains elusive, in part because of variation in the response across different ecosystems, and because of a diversity of proposed mechanisms, including microbial activation, stoichiometry, and community shifts. Here, we conducted five-week incubations of four soils (grassland, piñon-juniper, ponderosa pine, mixed conifer), varying the amount of substrate added (as 13C-glucose, either 350 or 1000 μg C g−1 week−1) and either with no added nitrogen (N), or with sufficient N (as NH4NO3) to bring the C-to-N ratio of the added substrate to 10. Using four different ecosystems enabled testing the generality of mechanisms underlying the priming effect. The responses of priming to the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate were consistent across ecosystems: priming increased with the rate of substrate addition and declined when the C-to-N ratio of the substrate was reduced. However, structural equation models failed to confirm intermediate responses postulated to mediate the priming effect, including responses postulated to be mediated by stoichiometry and microbial activation. Specifically, priming was not clearly associated with changes in microbial biomass or turnover, nor with extracellular enzyme activities or the microbial C-to-N ratio. The strongest explanatory pathways in the structural equation models were the substrate, soil, and C-to-N ratio treatments themselves, with no intermediates, suggesting that either these measurements lacked sufficient sensitivity to reveal causal relationships, or the actual drivers for priming were not included in the ancillary measurements. While we observed consistent changes in priming caused by the amount and C-to-N ratio of the added substrate across a wide array of soils, our findings did not clearly conform to common models offered for the priming effect. Because priming is a residual flux involving diverse substrates of varying chemical composition, a simple and generalizable explanation of the phenomenon may be elusive.

KW - Carbon use efficiency

KW - Microbial growth and respiration

KW - Nutrient limitation

KW - Soil carbon sequestration

KW - Soil organic matter decomposition

KW - Stable isotope tracer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074226958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074226958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107617

DO - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107617

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074226958

VL - 140

JO - Soil Biology and Biochemistry

JF - Soil Biology and Biochemistry

SN - 0038-0717

M1 - 107617

ER -