The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs

C. W. Anderson, Kiisa C Nishikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cn and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from tim tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)753-762
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
Volume179
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

frog
Anura
Mouth
frogs
mouth
tongue
Tongue
Jaw
jaws
Rana pipiens
Hypoglossal Nerve Injuries
prey size
Ranidae
Oligochaeta
earthworm
Rana
earthworms
nerve tissue
programme

Keywords

  • Afferent modulation
  • Deafferentation
  • Feeding behavior
  • Sensory feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

@article{e1cf9bc7b6cd428c83967212f7791d00,
title = "The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs",
abstract = "Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cn and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from tim tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.",
keywords = "Afferent modulation, Deafferentation, Feeding behavior, Sensory feedback",
author = "Anderson, {C. W.} and Nishikawa, {Kiisa C}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "179",
pages = "753--762",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology",
issn = "0340-7594",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs

AU - Anderson, C. W.

AU - Nishikawa, Kiisa C

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cn and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from tim tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.

AB - Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cn and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from tim tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.

KW - Afferent modulation

KW - Deafferentation

KW - Feeding behavior

KW - Sensory feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030461930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030461930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 753

EP - 762

JO - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

JF - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

SN - 0340-7594

IS - 6

ER -