The relation between visceral fat measurement and torso level - Is one level better than another? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 1990-1992

Meghan Warren, Pamela J. Schreiner, James G. Terry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intraabdominal fat (IAF) area is often measured indirectly in epidemiologic studies. The authors recruited 147 participants from the second examination (1990-1992) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study to examine IAF area and determine whether there were differences in IAF area and distribution by location. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to image four 10-mm slices between the second and fourth lumbar vertebrae by an inverse recovery method, and IAF was calculated from each image. The authors constructed gender-specific mixed models with IAF area as the outcome and the location of imaging along the torso as the independent variable, using random intercepts to account for between-person variation in IAF area. The torso location of IAF measurement was a significant predictor of IAF area in both men (p = 0.02) and women (p < 0.0001) after adjustment for body mass index. A significant positive interaction between age and location was seen in men, with increasing IAF area moving down the torso with older ages. Using magnetic resonance imaging, location along the torso yields different IAF areas and distributions independently of body mass index in both genders, with measurement at the second lumbar vertebra (slightly above the umbilicus) capturing the largest amount of IAF. Studies that attempt to link IAF with cardiovascular disease risk factors should consider measurement location to accurately capture the association.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-358
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume163
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Torso
Intra-Abdominal Fat
Atherosclerosis
Fats
Lumbar Vertebrae
Body Mass Index
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Umbilicus
Epidemiologic Studies
Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • Adipose tissue
  • Body composition
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Magnetic resonance imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The relation between visceral fat measurement and torso level - Is one level better than another? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 1990-1992. / Warren, Meghan; Schreiner, Pamela J.; Terry, James G.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 163, No. 4, 02.2006, p. 352-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fe08d5a669e4b8197f672c7798117c2,
title = "The relation between visceral fat measurement and torso level - Is one level better than another? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 1990-1992",
abstract = "Intraabdominal fat (IAF) area is often measured indirectly in epidemiologic studies. The authors recruited 147 participants from the second examination (1990-1992) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study to examine IAF area and determine whether there were differences in IAF area and distribution by location. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to image four 10-mm slices between the second and fourth lumbar vertebrae by an inverse recovery method, and IAF was calculated from each image. The authors constructed gender-specific mixed models with IAF area as the outcome and the location of imaging along the torso as the independent variable, using random intercepts to account for between-person variation in IAF area. The torso location of IAF measurement was a significant predictor of IAF area in both men (p = 0.02) and women (p < 0.0001) after adjustment for body mass index. A significant positive interaction between age and location was seen in men, with increasing IAF area moving down the torso with older ages. Using magnetic resonance imaging, location along the torso yields different IAF areas and distributions independently of body mass index in both genders, with measurement at the second lumbar vertebra (slightly above the umbilicus) capturing the largest amount of IAF. Studies that attempt to link IAF with cardiovascular disease risk factors should consider measurement location to accurately capture the association.",
keywords = "Adipose tissue, Body composition, Epidemiologic methods, Magnetic resonance imaging",
author = "Meghan Warren and Schreiner, {Pamela J.} and Terry, {James G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwj049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "163",
pages = "352--358",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relation between visceral fat measurement and torso level - Is one level better than another? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, 1990-1992

AU - Warren, Meghan

AU - Schreiner, Pamela J.

AU - Terry, James G.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Intraabdominal fat (IAF) area is often measured indirectly in epidemiologic studies. The authors recruited 147 participants from the second examination (1990-1992) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study to examine IAF area and determine whether there were differences in IAF area and distribution by location. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to image four 10-mm slices between the second and fourth lumbar vertebrae by an inverse recovery method, and IAF was calculated from each image. The authors constructed gender-specific mixed models with IAF area as the outcome and the location of imaging along the torso as the independent variable, using random intercepts to account for between-person variation in IAF area. The torso location of IAF measurement was a significant predictor of IAF area in both men (p = 0.02) and women (p < 0.0001) after adjustment for body mass index. A significant positive interaction between age and location was seen in men, with increasing IAF area moving down the torso with older ages. Using magnetic resonance imaging, location along the torso yields different IAF areas and distributions independently of body mass index in both genders, with measurement at the second lumbar vertebra (slightly above the umbilicus) capturing the largest amount of IAF. Studies that attempt to link IAF with cardiovascular disease risk factors should consider measurement location to accurately capture the association.

AB - Intraabdominal fat (IAF) area is often measured indirectly in epidemiologic studies. The authors recruited 147 participants from the second examination (1990-1992) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study to examine IAF area and determine whether there were differences in IAF area and distribution by location. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to image four 10-mm slices between the second and fourth lumbar vertebrae by an inverse recovery method, and IAF was calculated from each image. The authors constructed gender-specific mixed models with IAF area as the outcome and the location of imaging along the torso as the independent variable, using random intercepts to account for between-person variation in IAF area. The torso location of IAF measurement was a significant predictor of IAF area in both men (p = 0.02) and women (p < 0.0001) after adjustment for body mass index. A significant positive interaction between age and location was seen in men, with increasing IAF area moving down the torso with older ages. Using magnetic resonance imaging, location along the torso yields different IAF areas and distributions independently of body mass index in both genders, with measurement at the second lumbar vertebra (slightly above the umbilicus) capturing the largest amount of IAF. Studies that attempt to link IAF with cardiovascular disease risk factors should consider measurement location to accurately capture the association.

KW - Adipose tissue

KW - Body composition

KW - Epidemiologic methods

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32544449982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32544449982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwj049

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwj049

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 352

EP - 358

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 4

ER -