The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses

Ronald W. Yates, Brian Beaudrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study compared the impact of proctoring on the final course grades of community college students enrolled in distance education mathematics courses. The goal was to determine whether distance education students who are evaluated entirely online, in environments that are not proctored, receive grades that differ from distance education students who take proctored exams. In an analysis of 850 grades from a variety of distance education mathematics courses, 406 were given to students who were evaluated in a proctored environment, and the remaining 444 were a result of assessment that was conducted entirely in the online setting and was not proctored. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the grades that were earned in any of the individual courses. Also, no significant difference was found when the grades of the 406 students who took exams in person were compared with the 444 who were assessed entirely in an unsupervised online environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-70
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

community colleges
distance education
higher education
Distance education
mathematics
students
student
education
Students
college students
statistical analysis
Statistical methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Cite this

The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses. / Yates, Ronald W.; Beaudrie, Brian.

In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 62-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45f151c209814533bf08c56f984f5687,
title = "The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses",
abstract = "This study compared the impact of proctoring on the final course grades of community college students enrolled in distance education mathematics courses. The goal was to determine whether distance education students who are evaluated entirely online, in environments that are not proctored, receive grades that differ from distance education students who take proctored exams. In an analysis of 850 grades from a variety of distance education mathematics courses, 406 were given to students who were evaluated in a proctored environment, and the remaining 444 were a result of assessment that was conducted entirely in the online setting and was not proctored. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the grades that were earned in any of the individual courses. Also, no significant difference was found when the grades of the 406 students who took exams in person were compared with the 444 who were assessed entirely in an unsupervised online environment.",
author = "Yates, {Ronald W.} and Brian Beaudrie",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08923640902850601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "62--70",
journal = "International Journal of Phytoremediation",
issn = "1522-6514",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses

AU - Yates, Ronald W.

AU - Beaudrie, Brian

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - This study compared the impact of proctoring on the final course grades of community college students enrolled in distance education mathematics courses. The goal was to determine whether distance education students who are evaluated entirely online, in environments that are not proctored, receive grades that differ from distance education students who take proctored exams. In an analysis of 850 grades from a variety of distance education mathematics courses, 406 were given to students who were evaluated in a proctored environment, and the remaining 444 were a result of assessment that was conducted entirely in the online setting and was not proctored. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the grades that were earned in any of the individual courses. Also, no significant difference was found when the grades of the 406 students who took exams in person were compared with the 444 who were assessed entirely in an unsupervised online environment.

AB - This study compared the impact of proctoring on the final course grades of community college students enrolled in distance education mathematics courses. The goal was to determine whether distance education students who are evaluated entirely online, in environments that are not proctored, receive grades that differ from distance education students who take proctored exams. In an analysis of 850 grades from a variety of distance education mathematics courses, 406 were given to students who were evaluated in a proctored environment, and the remaining 444 were a result of assessment that was conducted entirely in the online setting and was not proctored. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the grades that were earned in any of the individual courses. Also, no significant difference was found when the grades of the 406 students who took exams in person were compared with the 444 who were assessed entirely in an unsupervised online environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064793903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064793903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08923640902850601

DO - 10.1080/08923640902850601

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064793903

VL - 21

SP - 62

EP - 70

JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation

JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation

SN - 1522-6514

IS - 1

ER -