The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the philosophical transactions and other contemporary medical prose

Innovations in a pioneering discourse

Bethany Gray, Douglas E Biber, Turo Hiltunen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Language users, regardless of register, employ a variety of lexico-grammatical markers to express their attitudes towards, evaluations of and level of commitment to what they speak or write. The linguistic marking of attitudes and assessments has been investigated under a variety of labels, such as evaluation (Hunston 1994; Hunston and Thompson 2000), hedging and boosting (Hyland 1996, 1998), evidentiality (Chafe 1986) and, perhaps most widely, stance (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006; Biber and Finegan 1988, 1989; Biber et al. 1999; Hyland 2005; Precht 2003). Stance research has investigated stance markers in a variety of registers and includes detailed investigations of particular stance devices (e.g., Lindemann and Mauranen's 2001 investigation into ‘just’), studies on a class of items (e.g., Swales and Burke 2003 on evaluative adjectives) and studies that document the ways in which multiple grammatical and semantic classes of stance features interact (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006). In spite of once-held perceptions that academic writing is largely free of overt markers of the writer's attitudes and opinions, recent scholarship has demonstrated that stance is an important aspect of formal written prose. This scholarship has emphasized the role of stance in creating and maintaining relationships between the writer and his or her audience as well as reflecting the value system of writers and their discourse communities (Hyland 1999, 2001, 2002; Thompson and Hunston 2000).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMedical Writing in Early Modern English
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages221-247
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)9780511921193, 9780521117661
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Innovation
Prose
Stance
Discourse
Writer
Evaluation
Discourse Community
Academic Writing
Adjective
Evidentiality
Semantic Classes
Grammatical Markers
Grammatical Class
Value Systems
Language
Hedging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the philosophical transactions and other contemporary medical prose : Innovations in a pioneering discourse. / Gray, Bethany; Biber, Douglas E; Hiltunen, Turo.

Medical Writing in Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 221-247.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

@inbook{968c4dacac0c4308bbeac7557450a5a3,
title = "The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the philosophical transactions and other contemporary medical prose: Innovations in a pioneering discourse",
abstract = "Introduction Language users, regardless of register, employ a variety of lexico-grammatical markers to express their attitudes towards, evaluations of and level of commitment to what they speak or write. The linguistic marking of attitudes and assessments has been investigated under a variety of labels, such as evaluation (Hunston 1994; Hunston and Thompson 2000), hedging and boosting (Hyland 1996, 1998), evidentiality (Chafe 1986) and, perhaps most widely, stance (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006; Biber and Finegan 1988, 1989; Biber et al. 1999; Hyland 2005; Precht 2003). Stance research has investigated stance markers in a variety of registers and includes detailed investigations of particular stance devices (e.g., Lindemann and Mauranen's 2001 investigation into ‘just’), studies on a class of items (e.g., Swales and Burke 2003 on evaluative adjectives) and studies that document the ways in which multiple grammatical and semantic classes of stance features interact (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006). In spite of once-held perceptions that academic writing is largely free of overt markers of the writer's attitudes and opinions, recent scholarship has demonstrated that stance is an important aspect of formal written prose. This scholarship has emphasized the role of stance in creating and maintaining relationships between the writer and his or her audience as well as reflecting the value system of writers and their discourse communities (Hyland 1999, 2001, 2002; Thompson and Hunston 2000).",
author = "Bethany Gray and Biber, {Douglas E} and Turo Hiltunen",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511921193.013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511921193",
pages = "221--247",
booktitle = "Medical Writing in Early Modern English",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the philosophical transactions and other contemporary medical prose

T2 - Innovations in a pioneering discourse

AU - Gray, Bethany

AU - Biber, Douglas E

AU - Hiltunen, Turo

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Introduction Language users, regardless of register, employ a variety of lexico-grammatical markers to express their attitudes towards, evaluations of and level of commitment to what they speak or write. The linguistic marking of attitudes and assessments has been investigated under a variety of labels, such as evaluation (Hunston 1994; Hunston and Thompson 2000), hedging and boosting (Hyland 1996, 1998), evidentiality (Chafe 1986) and, perhaps most widely, stance (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006; Biber and Finegan 1988, 1989; Biber et al. 1999; Hyland 2005; Precht 2003). Stance research has investigated stance markers in a variety of registers and includes detailed investigations of particular stance devices (e.g., Lindemann and Mauranen's 2001 investigation into ‘just’), studies on a class of items (e.g., Swales and Burke 2003 on evaluative adjectives) and studies that document the ways in which multiple grammatical and semantic classes of stance features interact (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006). In spite of once-held perceptions that academic writing is largely free of overt markers of the writer's attitudes and opinions, recent scholarship has demonstrated that stance is an important aspect of formal written prose. This scholarship has emphasized the role of stance in creating and maintaining relationships between the writer and his or her audience as well as reflecting the value system of writers and their discourse communities (Hyland 1999, 2001, 2002; Thompson and Hunston 2000).

AB - Introduction Language users, regardless of register, employ a variety of lexico-grammatical markers to express their attitudes towards, evaluations of and level of commitment to what they speak or write. The linguistic marking of attitudes and assessments has been investigated under a variety of labels, such as evaluation (Hunston 1994; Hunston and Thompson 2000), hedging and boosting (Hyland 1996, 1998), evidentiality (Chafe 1986) and, perhaps most widely, stance (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006; Biber and Finegan 1988, 1989; Biber et al. 1999; Hyland 2005; Precht 2003). Stance research has investigated stance markers in a variety of registers and includes detailed investigations of particular stance devices (e.g., Lindemann and Mauranen's 2001 investigation into ‘just’), studies on a class of items (e.g., Swales and Burke 2003 on evaluative adjectives) and studies that document the ways in which multiple grammatical and semantic classes of stance features interact (e.g., Biber 2004a, 2006). In spite of once-held perceptions that academic writing is largely free of overt markers of the writer's attitudes and opinions, recent scholarship has demonstrated that stance is an important aspect of formal written prose. This scholarship has emphasized the role of stance in creating and maintaining relationships between the writer and his or her audience as well as reflecting the value system of writers and their discourse communities (Hyland 1999, 2001, 2002; Thompson and Hunston 2000).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863518699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863518699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511921193.013

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511921193.013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511921193

SN - 9780521117661

SP - 221

EP - 247

BT - Medical Writing in Early Modern English

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -