The expression of crustacean mating strategies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CHAPTER SUMMARY Three fundamental patterns of phenotypic expression exist for alternative mating strategies. These patterns include Mendelian strategies, developmental strategies, and behavioral strategies. Each pattern of expression is revealed by hormonal and neurological factors that regulate the timing and degree to which phenotypic differences appear; however, the nature of each regulatory mechanism depends fundamentally on its underlying mode of inheritance. The genetic architectures underlying such inheritance in turn depend on the circumstances in which mating opportunities arise, including the intensity of selection favoring distinct reproductive morphologies, and the predictability of mating opportunities within individual lifespans. This chapter concerns the nature of this variation and its possible causes, with illustrations from the Crustacea. INTRODUCTION Although crustaceans were among the first recorded examples of alternative mating strategies (Orchestia darwinii: Darwin 1874, p. 275; Tanais spp.: Darwin 1874, p. 262), there is currently no synthetic treatment of how such polymorphisms are expressed within this group. The apparent scarcity of reports of male polymorphism among crustaceans is unexpected given the frequency with which sexual selection has been demonstrated within this taxon (Holdich 1968, 1971, Manning 1975, Stein 1976, Thompson and Manning 1981, Knowlton 1980, Shuster 1981, Christy 1983, Hatziolos and Caldwell 1983, reviews in Salmon 1984, Koga et al. 1993). As explained below, when sexual selection occurs, alternative mating strategies are likely to evolve. This chapter provides an evolutionary framework for understanding the expression of alternative mating strategies, with illustrations from the Crustacea (Table 9.1).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAlternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages224-250
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)9780511542602, 9780521832434
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Crustacea
Salmon
sexual selection
inheritance (genetics)
genetic polymorphism
selection intensity
salmon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Shuster, S. M. (2008). The expression of crustacean mating strategies. In Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach (pp. 224-250). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010

The expression of crustacean mating strategies. / Shuster, Stephen M.

Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 224-250.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Shuster, SM 2008, The expression of crustacean mating strategies. in Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press, pp. 224-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010
Shuster SM. The expression of crustacean mating strategies. In Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 224-250 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010
Shuster, Stephen M. / The expression of crustacean mating strategies. Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 224-250
@inbook{75317e0da3254eba91d3655025f69924,
title = "The expression of crustacean mating strategies",
abstract = "CHAPTER SUMMARY Three fundamental patterns of phenotypic expression exist for alternative mating strategies. These patterns include Mendelian strategies, developmental strategies, and behavioral strategies. Each pattern of expression is revealed by hormonal and neurological factors that regulate the timing and degree to which phenotypic differences appear; however, the nature of each regulatory mechanism depends fundamentally on its underlying mode of inheritance. The genetic architectures underlying such inheritance in turn depend on the circumstances in which mating opportunities arise, including the intensity of selection favoring distinct reproductive morphologies, and the predictability of mating opportunities within individual lifespans. This chapter concerns the nature of this variation and its possible causes, with illustrations from the Crustacea. INTRODUCTION Although crustaceans were among the first recorded examples of alternative mating strategies (Orchestia darwinii: Darwin 1874, p. 275; Tanais spp.: Darwin 1874, p. 262), there is currently no synthetic treatment of how such polymorphisms are expressed within this group. The apparent scarcity of reports of male polymorphism among crustaceans is unexpected given the frequency with which sexual selection has been demonstrated within this taxon (Holdich 1968, 1971, Manning 1975, Stein 1976, Thompson and Manning 1981, Knowlton 1980, Shuster 1981, Christy 1983, Hatziolos and Caldwell 1983, reviews in Salmon 1984, Koga et al. 1993). As explained below, when sexual selection occurs, alternative mating strategies are likely to evolve. This chapter provides an evolutionary framework for understanding the expression of alternative mating strategies, with illustrations from the Crustacea (Table 9.1).",
author = "Shuster, {Stephen M}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511542602",
pages = "224--250",
booktitle = "Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The expression of crustacean mating strategies

AU - Shuster, Stephen M

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - CHAPTER SUMMARY Three fundamental patterns of phenotypic expression exist for alternative mating strategies. These patterns include Mendelian strategies, developmental strategies, and behavioral strategies. Each pattern of expression is revealed by hormonal and neurological factors that regulate the timing and degree to which phenotypic differences appear; however, the nature of each regulatory mechanism depends fundamentally on its underlying mode of inheritance. The genetic architectures underlying such inheritance in turn depend on the circumstances in which mating opportunities arise, including the intensity of selection favoring distinct reproductive morphologies, and the predictability of mating opportunities within individual lifespans. This chapter concerns the nature of this variation and its possible causes, with illustrations from the Crustacea. INTRODUCTION Although crustaceans were among the first recorded examples of alternative mating strategies (Orchestia darwinii: Darwin 1874, p. 275; Tanais spp.: Darwin 1874, p. 262), there is currently no synthetic treatment of how such polymorphisms are expressed within this group. The apparent scarcity of reports of male polymorphism among crustaceans is unexpected given the frequency with which sexual selection has been demonstrated within this taxon (Holdich 1968, 1971, Manning 1975, Stein 1976, Thompson and Manning 1981, Knowlton 1980, Shuster 1981, Christy 1983, Hatziolos and Caldwell 1983, reviews in Salmon 1984, Koga et al. 1993). As explained below, when sexual selection occurs, alternative mating strategies are likely to evolve. This chapter provides an evolutionary framework for understanding the expression of alternative mating strategies, with illustrations from the Crustacea (Table 9.1).

AB - CHAPTER SUMMARY Three fundamental patterns of phenotypic expression exist for alternative mating strategies. These patterns include Mendelian strategies, developmental strategies, and behavioral strategies. Each pattern of expression is revealed by hormonal and neurological factors that regulate the timing and degree to which phenotypic differences appear; however, the nature of each regulatory mechanism depends fundamentally on its underlying mode of inheritance. The genetic architectures underlying such inheritance in turn depend on the circumstances in which mating opportunities arise, including the intensity of selection favoring distinct reproductive morphologies, and the predictability of mating opportunities within individual lifespans. This chapter concerns the nature of this variation and its possible causes, with illustrations from the Crustacea. INTRODUCTION Although crustaceans were among the first recorded examples of alternative mating strategies (Orchestia darwinii: Darwin 1874, p. 275; Tanais spp.: Darwin 1874, p. 262), there is currently no synthetic treatment of how such polymorphisms are expressed within this group. The apparent scarcity of reports of male polymorphism among crustaceans is unexpected given the frequency with which sexual selection has been demonstrated within this taxon (Holdich 1968, 1971, Manning 1975, Stein 1976, Thompson and Manning 1981, Knowlton 1980, Shuster 1981, Christy 1983, Hatziolos and Caldwell 1983, reviews in Salmon 1984, Koga et al. 1993). As explained below, when sexual selection occurs, alternative mating strategies are likely to evolve. This chapter provides an evolutionary framework for understanding the expression of alternative mating strategies, with illustrations from the Crustacea (Table 9.1).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651248264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651248264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511542602.010

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511542602

SN - 9780521832434

SP - 224

EP - 250

BT - Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -