The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Symmetries in physics are most commonly recognized and discussed in terms of their function in the mathematical formalism of the theories. Discussion of the observation of symmetries in nature is less common. This paper analyses the observation of particular symmetries such as Lorentz and gauge symmetries, distinguishing between direct observation of the symmetry itself and indirect evidence, the latter being the observation of some consequence of the symmetry. The result of the analysis is that globa symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry are, in an important sense, directly observed, while local symmetries such as gauge symmetry are not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-98
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume51
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

Symmetry
Physics
Gauge Symmetry
Formalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics. / Kosso, Peter.

In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 03.2000, p. 81-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01811d87d4ca4130acde43aea9b0ef0e,
title = "The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics",
abstract = "Symmetries in physics are most commonly recognized and discussed in terms of their function in the mathematical formalism of the theories. Discussion of the observation of symmetries in nature is less common. This paper analyses the observation of particular symmetries such as Lorentz and gauge symmetries, distinguishing between direct observation of the symmetry itself and indirect evidence, the latter being the observation of some consequence of the symmetry. The result of the analysis is that globa symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry are, in an important sense, directly observed, while local symmetries such as gauge symmetry are not.",
author = "Peter Kosso",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "81--98",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics

AU - Kosso, Peter

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Symmetries in physics are most commonly recognized and discussed in terms of their function in the mathematical formalism of the theories. Discussion of the observation of symmetries in nature is less common. This paper analyses the observation of particular symmetries such as Lorentz and gauge symmetries, distinguishing between direct observation of the symmetry itself and indirect evidence, the latter being the observation of some consequence of the symmetry. The result of the analysis is that globa symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry are, in an important sense, directly observed, while local symmetries such as gauge symmetry are not.

AB - Symmetries in physics are most commonly recognized and discussed in terms of their function in the mathematical formalism of the theories. Discussion of the observation of symmetries in nature is less common. This paper analyses the observation of particular symmetries such as Lorentz and gauge symmetries, distinguishing between direct observation of the symmetry itself and indirect evidence, the latter being the observation of some consequence of the symmetry. The result of the analysis is that globa symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry are, in an important sense, directly observed, while local symmetries such as gauge symmetry are not.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041725088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041725088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 81

EP - 98

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

IS - 1

ER -