The EMBeRS project

employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis

Deana Pennington, Gabriele Bammer, Antje Danielson, David Gosselin, Julia Gouvea, Geoffrey Habron, Dave Hawthorne, Roderic A Parnell, Kate Thompson, Shirley Vincent, Cynthia Wei

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In inter- and transdisciplinary teams, diverse perspectives on a particular problem must be integrated into shared models of the problem. This process has been identified as a core challenge for socio-environmental synthesis research and education. There is little understanding of how to facilitate knowledge integration across perspectives. We generated new understanding of the process of knowledge integration in socio-environmental synthesis through two intersecting processes. First, we reviewed well-established literature in the cognitive, social, and learning sciences that connects material artifacts, boundary objects, and model-based reasoning. Second, we conducted an organized reflection (our own model-based reasoning) on the literature. Key findings include identifying the importance of combining a collective negotiation process with iterative individual external representations of the problem. The external representations are partial, temporary constructs that function as boundary negotiating objects, and enable the scaffolding of cognitive interactions between participants, an essential part of generating shared, integrative problem models between interdisciplinary team members. We hypothesize that facilitating the co-creation of boundary negotiating objects may provide a path forward for enabling more effective interdisciplinary work and the development of a set of knowledge synthesis skills and competencies for students and researchers. This article provides a first report regarding our research on this topic, with additional research papers forthcoming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-286
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

negotiation process
environmental research
transdisciplinary
environmental education
knowledge
artifact
student
learning
education
project
interaction
science
literature
material

Keywords

  • Boundary objects
  • Distributed cognition
  • Interdisciplinary teamwork
  • Knowledge integration
  • Team cognition
  • Transdisciplinary research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Pennington, D., Bammer, G., Danielson, A., Gosselin, D., Gouvea, J., Habron, G., ... Wei, C. (2016). The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8

The EMBeRS project : employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. / Pennington, Deana; Bammer, Gabriele; Danielson, Antje; Gosselin, David; Gouvea, Julia; Habron, Geoffrey; Hawthorne, Dave; Parnell, Roderic A; Thompson, Kate; Vincent, Shirley; Wei, Cynthia.

In: Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 278-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pennington, D, Bammer, G, Danielson, A, Gosselin, D, Gouvea, J, Habron, G, Hawthorne, D, Parnell, RA, Thompson, K, Vincent, S & Wei, C 2016, 'The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis', Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8
Pennington, Deana ; Bammer, Gabriele ; Danielson, Antje ; Gosselin, David ; Gouvea, Julia ; Habron, Geoffrey ; Hawthorne, Dave ; Parnell, Roderic A ; Thompson, Kate ; Vincent, Shirley ; Wei, Cynthia. / The EMBeRS project : employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. In: Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 278-286.
@article{cc32b8bac087492fbd29184129c9624c,
title = "The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis",
abstract = "In inter- and transdisciplinary teams, diverse perspectives on a particular problem must be integrated into shared models of the problem. This process has been identified as a core challenge for socio-environmental synthesis research and education. There is little understanding of how to facilitate knowledge integration across perspectives. We generated new understanding of the process of knowledge integration in socio-environmental synthesis through two intersecting processes. First, we reviewed well-established literature in the cognitive, social, and learning sciences that connects material artifacts, boundary objects, and model-based reasoning. Second, we conducted an organized reflection (our own model-based reasoning) on the literature. Key findings include identifying the importance of combining a collective negotiation process with iterative individual external representations of the problem. The external representations are partial, temporary constructs that function as boundary negotiating objects, and enable the scaffolding of cognitive interactions between participants, an essential part of generating shared, integrative problem models between interdisciplinary team members. We hypothesize that facilitating the co-creation of boundary negotiating objects may provide a path forward for enabling more effective interdisciplinary work and the development of a set of knowledge synthesis skills and competencies for students and researchers. This article provides a first report regarding our research on this topic, with additional research papers forthcoming.",
keywords = "Boundary objects, Distributed cognition, Interdisciplinary teamwork, Knowledge integration, Team cognition, Transdisciplinary research",
author = "Deana Pennington and Gabriele Bammer and Antje Danielson and David Gosselin and Julia Gouvea and Geoffrey Habron and Dave Hawthorne and Parnell, {Roderic A} and Kate Thompson and Shirley Vincent and Cynthia Wei",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "278--286",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences",
issn = "2190-6483",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EMBeRS project

T2 - employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis

AU - Pennington, Deana

AU - Bammer, Gabriele

AU - Danielson, Antje

AU - Gosselin, David

AU - Gouvea, Julia

AU - Habron, Geoffrey

AU - Hawthorne, Dave

AU - Parnell, Roderic A

AU - Thompson, Kate

AU - Vincent, Shirley

AU - Wei, Cynthia

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - In inter- and transdisciplinary teams, diverse perspectives on a particular problem must be integrated into shared models of the problem. This process has been identified as a core challenge for socio-environmental synthesis research and education. There is little understanding of how to facilitate knowledge integration across perspectives. We generated new understanding of the process of knowledge integration in socio-environmental synthesis through two intersecting processes. First, we reviewed well-established literature in the cognitive, social, and learning sciences that connects material artifacts, boundary objects, and model-based reasoning. Second, we conducted an organized reflection (our own model-based reasoning) on the literature. Key findings include identifying the importance of combining a collective negotiation process with iterative individual external representations of the problem. The external representations are partial, temporary constructs that function as boundary negotiating objects, and enable the scaffolding of cognitive interactions between participants, an essential part of generating shared, integrative problem models between interdisciplinary team members. We hypothesize that facilitating the co-creation of boundary negotiating objects may provide a path forward for enabling more effective interdisciplinary work and the development of a set of knowledge synthesis skills and competencies for students and researchers. This article provides a first report regarding our research on this topic, with additional research papers forthcoming.

AB - In inter- and transdisciplinary teams, diverse perspectives on a particular problem must be integrated into shared models of the problem. This process has been identified as a core challenge for socio-environmental synthesis research and education. There is little understanding of how to facilitate knowledge integration across perspectives. We generated new understanding of the process of knowledge integration in socio-environmental synthesis through two intersecting processes. First, we reviewed well-established literature in the cognitive, social, and learning sciences that connects material artifacts, boundary objects, and model-based reasoning. Second, we conducted an organized reflection (our own model-based reasoning) on the literature. Key findings include identifying the importance of combining a collective negotiation process with iterative individual external representations of the problem. The external representations are partial, temporary constructs that function as boundary negotiating objects, and enable the scaffolding of cognitive interactions between participants, an essential part of generating shared, integrative problem models between interdisciplinary team members. We hypothesize that facilitating the co-creation of boundary negotiating objects may provide a path forward for enabling more effective interdisciplinary work and the development of a set of knowledge synthesis skills and competencies for students and researchers. This article provides a first report regarding our research on this topic, with additional research papers forthcoming.

KW - Boundary objects

KW - Distributed cognition

KW - Interdisciplinary teamwork

KW - Knowledge integration

KW - Team cognition

KW - Transdisciplinary research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006192482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006192482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8

DO - 10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 278

EP - 286

JO - Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

JF - Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

SN - 2190-6483

IS - 2

ER -