The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction

Bradford Lee, Luke Plonsky, Kazuya Saito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While research has shown that provision of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) is facilitative of various aspects of second language (L2) speech learning (Thomson & Derwing, 2015), a growing number of scholars have begun to examine which type of instruction can best impact on acquisition. In the current study, we explored the effects of perception- vs. production-based methods of PI among tertiary-level Japanese students of English. Participants (N = 115) received two weeks of instruction on either segmental or suprasegmental features of English, using either a perception- or a production-based method, with progress assessed in a pre/post/delayed posttest study design. Although all four treatment groups demonstrated major gains in pronunciation accuracy, performance varied considerably across groups and over time. A close examination of our findings suggested that perception-based training may be the more effective training method across both segmental and suprasegmental features.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102185
JournalSystem
Volume88
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

instruction
training method
Group
examination
language
learning
performance
Suprasegmental Features
student
Group Treatment
Posttests
Language
Japanese Students
time

Keywords

  • English as a foreign language
  • L2 pronunciation
  • Perception-based instruction
  • Production-based instruction
  • Pronunciation instruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction. / Lee, Bradford; Plonsky, Luke; Saito, Kazuya.

In: System, Vol. 88, 102185, 02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{baf7e725cc004ee09d81aa27a97cc44d,
title = "The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction",
abstract = "While research has shown that provision of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) is facilitative of various aspects of second language (L2) speech learning (Thomson & Derwing, 2015), a growing number of scholars have begun to examine which type of instruction can best impact on acquisition. In the current study, we explored the effects of perception- vs. production-based methods of PI among tertiary-level Japanese students of English. Participants (N = 115) received two weeks of instruction on either segmental or suprasegmental features of English, using either a perception- or a production-based method, with progress assessed in a pre/post/delayed posttest study design. Although all four treatment groups demonstrated major gains in pronunciation accuracy, performance varied considerably across groups and over time. A close examination of our findings suggested that perception-based training may be the more effective training method across both segmental and suprasegmental features.",
keywords = "English as a foreign language, L2 pronunciation, Perception-based instruction, Production-based instruction, Pronunciation instruction",
author = "Bradford Lee and Luke Plonsky and Kazuya Saito",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.system.2019.102185",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
journal = "System",
issn = "0346-251X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction

AU - Lee, Bradford

AU - Plonsky, Luke

AU - Saito, Kazuya

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - While research has shown that provision of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) is facilitative of various aspects of second language (L2) speech learning (Thomson & Derwing, 2015), a growing number of scholars have begun to examine which type of instruction can best impact on acquisition. In the current study, we explored the effects of perception- vs. production-based methods of PI among tertiary-level Japanese students of English. Participants (N = 115) received two weeks of instruction on either segmental or suprasegmental features of English, using either a perception- or a production-based method, with progress assessed in a pre/post/delayed posttest study design. Although all four treatment groups demonstrated major gains in pronunciation accuracy, performance varied considerably across groups and over time. A close examination of our findings suggested that perception-based training may be the more effective training method across both segmental and suprasegmental features.

AB - While research has shown that provision of explicit pronunciation instruction (PI) is facilitative of various aspects of second language (L2) speech learning (Thomson & Derwing, 2015), a growing number of scholars have begun to examine which type of instruction can best impact on acquisition. In the current study, we explored the effects of perception- vs. production-based methods of PI among tertiary-level Japanese students of English. Participants (N = 115) received two weeks of instruction on either segmental or suprasegmental features of English, using either a perception- or a production-based method, with progress assessed in a pre/post/delayed posttest study design. Although all four treatment groups demonstrated major gains in pronunciation accuracy, performance varied considerably across groups and over time. A close examination of our findings suggested that perception-based training may be the more effective training method across both segmental and suprasegmental features.

KW - English as a foreign language

KW - L2 pronunciation

KW - Perception-based instruction

KW - Production-based instruction

KW - Pronunciation instruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075883773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075883773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.system.2019.102185

DO - 10.1016/j.system.2019.102185

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075883773

VL - 88

JO - System

JF - System

SN - 0346-251X

M1 - 102185

ER -