The effects of message framing and message processing on testicular self-examination attitudes and perceived susceptibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of message framing (gain and loss) and depth of message processing (high and low) on perceived susceptibility and attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations. Hypothesized predictions were based on prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979, 1982) and the elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Participants were exposed to either a gain or loss frame message and were measured and classified as high or low depth of message processing. Participants exposed to the loss frame message reported feeling greater testicular cancer perceived susceptibility than those exposed to gain frame messages. It was hypothesized that a framing effect would occur for participants who had greater depth of message processing. The results suggest that participants who processed the message more deeply and who were exposed to loss frame messages had more positive attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations compared to participants who processed carefully and were exposed to the gain frame message and participants who processed either message frame less carefully. Theoretical implications and limitations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-105
Number of pages9
JournalCommunication Research Reports
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

examination
Processing
cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{69035dd2d2ef45768d7b1c4b5dfecb55,
title = "The effects of message framing and message processing on testicular self-examination attitudes and perceived susceptibility",
abstract = "This study examined the effects of message framing (gain and loss) and depth of message processing (high and low) on perceived susceptibility and attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations. Hypothesized predictions were based on prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979, 1982) and the elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Participants were exposed to either a gain or loss frame message and were measured and classified as high or low depth of message processing. Participants exposed to the loss frame message reported feeling greater testicular cancer perceived susceptibility than those exposed to gain frame messages. It was hypothesized that a framing effect would occur for participants who had greater depth of message processing. The results suggest that participants who processed the message more deeply and who were exposed to loss frame messages had more positive attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations compared to participants who processed carefully and were exposed to the gain frame message and participants who processed either message frame less carefully. Theoretical implications and limitations are discussed.",
author = "Laura Umphrey",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08824090309388805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "97--105",
journal = "Communication Research Reports",
issn = "0882-4096",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of message framing and message processing on testicular self-examination attitudes and perceived susceptibility

AU - Umphrey, Laura

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - This study examined the effects of message framing (gain and loss) and depth of message processing (high and low) on perceived susceptibility and attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations. Hypothesized predictions were based on prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979, 1982) and the elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Participants were exposed to either a gain or loss frame message and were measured and classified as high or low depth of message processing. Participants exposed to the loss frame message reported feeling greater testicular cancer perceived susceptibility than those exposed to gain frame messages. It was hypothesized that a framing effect would occur for participants who had greater depth of message processing. The results suggest that participants who processed the message more deeply and who were exposed to loss frame messages had more positive attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations compared to participants who processed carefully and were exposed to the gain frame message and participants who processed either message frame less carefully. Theoretical implications and limitations are discussed.

AB - This study examined the effects of message framing (gain and loss) and depth of message processing (high and low) on perceived susceptibility and attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations. Hypothesized predictions were based on prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979, 1982) and the elaboration likelihood model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Participants were exposed to either a gain or loss frame message and were measured and classified as high or low depth of message processing. Participants exposed to the loss frame message reported feeling greater testicular cancer perceived susceptibility than those exposed to gain frame messages. It was hypothesized that a framing effect would occur for participants who had greater depth of message processing. The results suggest that participants who processed the message more deeply and who were exposed to loss frame messages had more positive attitudes towards performing testicular self-examinations compared to participants who processed carefully and were exposed to the gain frame message and participants who processed either message frame less carefully. Theoretical implications and limitations are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061979822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061979822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08824090309388805

DO - 10.1080/08824090309388805

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 97

EP - 105

JO - Communication Research Reports

JF - Communication Research Reports

SN - 0882-4096

IS - 2

ER -