The economics of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments in the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem

Michael H. Taylor, Andrew J Sanchez Meador, Yeon-Su Kim, Kimberly Rollins, Hank Will

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we develop a simulation model of the benefits and costs of managing the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem in the southwestern United States. Using the model, we evaluate and compare the economic benefits and costs of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Both treatment approaches increase the expected number of low-severity wildfires, which can promote postfire rehabilitation. Hazardous fuel reduction treatments are likely to reduce expected wildfire suppression costs, but not enough to offset the costs of implementing treatments. Conversely, ecological restoration treatments do not necessarily reduce expected wildfire suppression costs but fully restore the ecosystem in more than half of the simulation runs, which lowers the need for future fire suppression and reduces the chance of conversion to nonforest, alternative stable states. We find that the choice between hazardous fuel reduction and ecological treatments will depend on the management objective being pursued, as well as on site-specific factors such as the wildfire return interval and the economic value of biomass removed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)988-1008
Number of pages21
JournalForest Science
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 20 2015

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
Pinus ponderosa
wildfires
forest ecosystems
forest ecosystem
coniferous forests
wildfire
economics
cost
fire suppression
Southwestern United States
economic valuation
simulation models
simulation
restoration
ecosystems
biomass
ecosystem

Keywords

  • Ecological thresholds
  • Policy
  • Simulation model
  • State-and-transition model
  • Wildfire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology

Cite this

The economics of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments in the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem. / Taylor, Michael H.; Sanchez Meador, Andrew J; Kim, Yeon-Su; Rollins, Kimberly; Will, Hank.

In: Forest Science, Vol. 61, No. 6, 20.12.2015, p. 988-1008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddf3c2ef186b452d9448f15a45269b58,
title = "The economics of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments in the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem",
abstract = "In this article, we develop a simulation model of the benefits and costs of managing the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem in the southwestern United States. Using the model, we evaluate and compare the economic benefits and costs of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Both treatment approaches increase the expected number of low-severity wildfires, which can promote postfire rehabilitation. Hazardous fuel reduction treatments are likely to reduce expected wildfire suppression costs, but not enough to offset the costs of implementing treatments. Conversely, ecological restoration treatments do not necessarily reduce expected wildfire suppression costs but fully restore the ecosystem in more than half of the simulation runs, which lowers the need for future fire suppression and reduces the chance of conversion to nonforest, alternative stable states. We find that the choice between hazardous fuel reduction and ecological treatments will depend on the management objective being pursued, as well as on site-specific factors such as the wildfire return interval and the economic value of biomass removed.",
keywords = "Ecological thresholds, Policy, Simulation model, State-and-transition model, Wildfire",
author = "Taylor, {Michael H.} and {Sanchez Meador}, {Andrew J} and Yeon-Su Kim and Kimberly Rollins and Hank Will",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.5849/forsci.14-030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "988--1008",
journal = "Forest Science",
issn = "0015-749X",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economics of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments in the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem

AU - Taylor, Michael H.

AU - Sanchez Meador, Andrew J

AU - Kim, Yeon-Su

AU - Rollins, Kimberly

AU - Will, Hank

PY - 2015/12/20

Y1 - 2015/12/20

N2 - In this article, we develop a simulation model of the benefits and costs of managing the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem in the southwestern United States. Using the model, we evaluate and compare the economic benefits and costs of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Both treatment approaches increase the expected number of low-severity wildfires, which can promote postfire rehabilitation. Hazardous fuel reduction treatments are likely to reduce expected wildfire suppression costs, but not enough to offset the costs of implementing treatments. Conversely, ecological restoration treatments do not necessarily reduce expected wildfire suppression costs but fully restore the ecosystem in more than half of the simulation runs, which lowers the need for future fire suppression and reduces the chance of conversion to nonforest, alternative stable states. We find that the choice between hazardous fuel reduction and ecological treatments will depend on the management objective being pursued, as well as on site-specific factors such as the wildfire return interval and the economic value of biomass removed.

AB - In this article, we develop a simulation model of the benefits and costs of managing the ponderosa pine forest ecosystem in the southwestern United States. Using the model, we evaluate and compare the economic benefits and costs of ecological restoration and hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Both treatment approaches increase the expected number of low-severity wildfires, which can promote postfire rehabilitation. Hazardous fuel reduction treatments are likely to reduce expected wildfire suppression costs, but not enough to offset the costs of implementing treatments. Conversely, ecological restoration treatments do not necessarily reduce expected wildfire suppression costs but fully restore the ecosystem in more than half of the simulation runs, which lowers the need for future fire suppression and reduces the chance of conversion to nonforest, alternative stable states. We find that the choice between hazardous fuel reduction and ecological treatments will depend on the management objective being pursued, as well as on site-specific factors such as the wildfire return interval and the economic value of biomass removed.

KW - Ecological thresholds

KW - Policy

KW - Simulation model

KW - State-and-transition model

KW - Wildfire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948732244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948732244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5849/forsci.14-030

DO - 10.5849/forsci.14-030

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 988

EP - 1008

JO - Forest Science

JF - Forest Science

SN - 0015-749X

IS - 6

ER -