The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior

Ann D Collier, S. Arndt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons was investigated using a multitrait multimethod analysis. The validity issues of concern were (a) how generalizable the adaptive behavior dimension is over a variety of measurement methods, (b) how adaptive behavior relates to mental age (MA), and (c) how well adaptive behavior assessment references placement in programs and situations. Adaptive behavior and MA were assessed by program participation, psychometric ratings, and overall staff ratings. Adaptive behavior had high convergent validity and low discriminant validity and predicted MA program placement better than did MA. We concluded that adaptive behavior scores could replace MA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-550
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Mental Deficiency
Volume87
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychological Adaptation
Mentally Disabled Persons
Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior. / Collier, Ann D; Arndt, S.

In: American Journal of Mental Deficiency, Vol. 87, No. 5, 1983, p. 546-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{740c08f6ae874af5b25b1f54ec668faf,
title = "The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior",
abstract = "The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons was investigated using a multitrait multimethod analysis. The validity issues of concern were (a) how generalizable the adaptive behavior dimension is over a variety of measurement methods, (b) how adaptive behavior relates to mental age (MA), and (c) how well adaptive behavior assessment references placement in programs and situations. Adaptive behavior and MA were assessed by program participation, psychometric ratings, and overall staff ratings. Adaptive behavior had high convergent validity and low discriminant validity and predicted MA program placement better than did MA. We concluded that adaptive behavior scores could replace MA.",
author = "Collier, {Ann D} and S. Arndt",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "546--550",
journal = "American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "1944-7515",
publisher = "American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior

AU - Collier, Ann D

AU - Arndt, S.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons was investigated using a multitrait multimethod analysis. The validity issues of concern were (a) how generalizable the adaptive behavior dimension is over a variety of measurement methods, (b) how adaptive behavior relates to mental age (MA), and (c) how well adaptive behavior assessment references placement in programs and situations. Adaptive behavior and MA were assessed by program participation, psychometric ratings, and overall staff ratings. Adaptive behavior had high convergent validity and low discriminant validity and predicted MA program placement better than did MA. We concluded that adaptive behavior scores could replace MA.

AB - The construct and predictive validity of adaptive behavior of mentally retarded persons was investigated using a multitrait multimethod analysis. The validity issues of concern were (a) how generalizable the adaptive behavior dimension is over a variety of measurement methods, (b) how adaptive behavior relates to mental age (MA), and (c) how well adaptive behavior assessment references placement in programs and situations. Adaptive behavior and MA were assessed by program participation, psychometric ratings, and overall staff ratings. Adaptive behavior had high convergent validity and low discriminant validity and predicted MA program placement better than did MA. We concluded that adaptive behavior scores could replace MA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020673419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020673419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 546

EP - 550

JO - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

JF - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

SN - 1944-7515

IS - 5

ER -