The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States

Victoria J. Bakker, Julia K. Baum, Jedediah F. Brodie, Anne K. Salomon, Brett G Dickson, Holly K. Gibbs, Olaf P. Jensen, Peter B. Mcintyre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To understand the changing role of funding sources in shaping conservation science in the United States, we analyzed acknowledgments from published studies, trends in research funding, and survey responses from conservation scientists. Although the U.S. federal government was the most frequently acknowledged source of support overall, U.S. foundations and NGOs were the predominant sources for tropical and socioeconomic research. Acknowledgments of foundation support for conservation research increased over the last two decades, while recognition of federal funds declined. Concordant trends in funding and acknowledgments indicated a changing landscape for conservation science, in which federal support has not kept pace with the growth in conservation research efforts or needs. Survey responses from conservation scientists about their funding sources were consistent with acknowledgment data, and most (64%) indicated that shifts in funding sources and amounts affected the type of research they conduct. Ongoing changes in the funding landscape shape the direction of conservation research and may make conservation science more vulnerable to economic recessions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-444
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Letters
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

landscape management
funding
economic recession
federal government
research support
socioeconomics
science
nongovernmental organization
economics

Keywords

  • Conservation funding
  • Conservation investment
  • Conservation NGOs
  • Conservation science
  • Economy
  • Foundation
  • Philanthropy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Bakker, V. J., Baum, J. K., Brodie, J. F., Salomon, A. K., Dickson, B. G., Gibbs, H. K., ... Mcintyre, P. B. (2010). The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States. Conservation Letters, 3(6), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x

The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States. / Bakker, Victoria J.; Baum, Julia K.; Brodie, Jedediah F.; Salomon, Anne K.; Dickson, Brett G; Gibbs, Holly K.; Jensen, Olaf P.; Mcintyre, Peter B.

In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010, p. 435-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bakker, VJ, Baum, JK, Brodie, JF, Salomon, AK, Dickson, BG, Gibbs, HK, Jensen, OP & Mcintyre, PB 2010, 'The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States', Conservation Letters, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x
Bakker, Victoria J. ; Baum, Julia K. ; Brodie, Jedediah F. ; Salomon, Anne K. ; Dickson, Brett G ; Gibbs, Holly K. ; Jensen, Olaf P. ; Mcintyre, Peter B. / The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States. In: Conservation Letters. 2010 ; Vol. 3, No. 6. pp. 435-444.
@article{07ea70e2022144ca98623674ffc01c59,
title = "The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States",
abstract = "To understand the changing role of funding sources in shaping conservation science in the United States, we analyzed acknowledgments from published studies, trends in research funding, and survey responses from conservation scientists. Although the U.S. federal government was the most frequently acknowledged source of support overall, U.S. foundations and NGOs were the predominant sources for tropical and socioeconomic research. Acknowledgments of foundation support for conservation research increased over the last two decades, while recognition of federal funds declined. Concordant trends in funding and acknowledgments indicated a changing landscape for conservation science, in which federal support has not kept pace with the growth in conservation research efforts or needs. Survey responses from conservation scientists about their funding sources were consistent with acknowledgment data, and most (64{\%}) indicated that shifts in funding sources and amounts affected the type of research they conduct. Ongoing changes in the funding landscape shape the direction of conservation research and may make conservation science more vulnerable to economic recessions.",
keywords = "Conservation funding, Conservation investment, Conservation NGOs, Conservation science, Economy, Foundation, Philanthropy",
author = "Bakker, {Victoria J.} and Baum, {Julia K.} and Brodie, {Jedediah F.} and Salomon, {Anne K.} and Dickson, {Brett G} and Gibbs, {Holly K.} and Jensen, {Olaf P.} and Mcintyre, {Peter B.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "435--444",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
issn = "1755-263X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The changing landscape of conservation science funding in the United States

AU - Bakker, Victoria J.

AU - Baum, Julia K.

AU - Brodie, Jedediah F.

AU - Salomon, Anne K.

AU - Dickson, Brett G

AU - Gibbs, Holly K.

AU - Jensen, Olaf P.

AU - Mcintyre, Peter B.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - To understand the changing role of funding sources in shaping conservation science in the United States, we analyzed acknowledgments from published studies, trends in research funding, and survey responses from conservation scientists. Although the U.S. federal government was the most frequently acknowledged source of support overall, U.S. foundations and NGOs were the predominant sources for tropical and socioeconomic research. Acknowledgments of foundation support for conservation research increased over the last two decades, while recognition of federal funds declined. Concordant trends in funding and acknowledgments indicated a changing landscape for conservation science, in which federal support has not kept pace with the growth in conservation research efforts or needs. Survey responses from conservation scientists about their funding sources were consistent with acknowledgment data, and most (64%) indicated that shifts in funding sources and amounts affected the type of research they conduct. Ongoing changes in the funding landscape shape the direction of conservation research and may make conservation science more vulnerable to economic recessions.

AB - To understand the changing role of funding sources in shaping conservation science in the United States, we analyzed acknowledgments from published studies, trends in research funding, and survey responses from conservation scientists. Although the U.S. federal government was the most frequently acknowledged source of support overall, U.S. foundations and NGOs were the predominant sources for tropical and socioeconomic research. Acknowledgments of foundation support for conservation research increased over the last two decades, while recognition of federal funds declined. Concordant trends in funding and acknowledgments indicated a changing landscape for conservation science, in which federal support has not kept pace with the growth in conservation research efforts or needs. Survey responses from conservation scientists about their funding sources were consistent with acknowledgment data, and most (64%) indicated that shifts in funding sources and amounts affected the type of research they conduct. Ongoing changes in the funding landscape shape the direction of conservation research and may make conservation science more vulnerable to economic recessions.

KW - Conservation funding

KW - Conservation investment

KW - Conservation NGOs

KW - Conservation science

KW - Economy

KW - Foundation

KW - Philanthropy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957658951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957658951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00125.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79957658951

VL - 3

SP - 435

EP - 444

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

IS - 6

ER -