The 2005 planning rule as a teaching tool

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2005, the US Forest Service released a new planning rule, more incremental in its approach, and intended to overcome limitations identified in previous US Forest Service planning approaches. We have adopted a new framework broadly based on the 2005 rule and enhanced by the use of scenario planning techniques for our senior capstone planning course. Our methodology is described, along with the positive and negative effects of the new approach we have observed in our 2 years of experiences. Although our key learning outcomes remain unchanged, the new approach has shifted the emphasis toward the recognition of multiple perspectives and divergent social values and uncertainty, at some cost to the rigor of the technical analysis. Examples of student management plans, and a public presentation by the 2007 class, are available on our class website.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-325
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume105
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

teaching
planning
USDA Forest Service
social benefit
students
uncertainty
learning
student
methodology
cost
services

Keywords

  • Forest planning
  • Forestry education
  • The new planning rule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

The 2005 planning rule as a teaching tool. / Kim, Yeon-Su; Dewhurst, Stephen M; Hospodarsky, Denver C.

In: Journal of Forestry, Vol. 105, No. 6, 09.2007, p. 320-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{344ff4f519774387b923f63285e562ac,
title = "The 2005 planning rule as a teaching tool",
abstract = "In 2005, the US Forest Service released a new planning rule, more incremental in its approach, and intended to overcome limitations identified in previous US Forest Service planning approaches. We have adopted a new framework broadly based on the 2005 rule and enhanced by the use of scenario planning techniques for our senior capstone planning course. Our methodology is described, along with the positive and negative effects of the new approach we have observed in our 2 years of experiences. Although our key learning outcomes remain unchanged, the new approach has shifted the emphasis toward the recognition of multiple perspectives and divergent social values and uncertainty, at some cost to the rigor of the technical analysis. Examples of student management plans, and a public presentation by the 2007 class, are available on our class website.",
keywords = "Forest planning, Forestry education, The new planning rule",
author = "Yeon-Su Kim and Dewhurst, {Stephen M} and Hospodarsky, {Denver C}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "320--325",
journal = "Journal of Forestry",
issn = "0022-1201",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 2005 planning rule as a teaching tool

AU - Kim, Yeon-Su

AU - Dewhurst, Stephen M

AU - Hospodarsky, Denver C

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - In 2005, the US Forest Service released a new planning rule, more incremental in its approach, and intended to overcome limitations identified in previous US Forest Service planning approaches. We have adopted a new framework broadly based on the 2005 rule and enhanced by the use of scenario planning techniques for our senior capstone planning course. Our methodology is described, along with the positive and negative effects of the new approach we have observed in our 2 years of experiences. Although our key learning outcomes remain unchanged, the new approach has shifted the emphasis toward the recognition of multiple perspectives and divergent social values and uncertainty, at some cost to the rigor of the technical analysis. Examples of student management plans, and a public presentation by the 2007 class, are available on our class website.

AB - In 2005, the US Forest Service released a new planning rule, more incremental in its approach, and intended to overcome limitations identified in previous US Forest Service planning approaches. We have adopted a new framework broadly based on the 2005 rule and enhanced by the use of scenario planning techniques for our senior capstone planning course. Our methodology is described, along with the positive and negative effects of the new approach we have observed in our 2 years of experiences. Although our key learning outcomes remain unchanged, the new approach has shifted the emphasis toward the recognition of multiple perspectives and divergent social values and uncertainty, at some cost to the rigor of the technical analysis. Examples of student management plans, and a public presentation by the 2007 class, are available on our class website.

KW - Forest planning

KW - Forestry education

KW - The new planning rule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448978425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448978425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 320

EP - 325

JO - Journal of Forestry

JF - Journal of Forestry

SN - 0022-1201

IS - 6

ER -