The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon

Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change

John C. Schmidt, Roderic A Parnell, Paul E. Grams, Joseph E. Hazel, Matthew A. Kaplinski, Lawrence E. Stevens, Timothy L. Hoffnagle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1996 controlled flood released from Glen Canyon Dam into the Colorado River was a small magnitude, short duration event compared to pre-dam floods. The controlled flood was of lesser magnitude than a 1.25-yr recurrence, and only 10% of the predam spring snowmelt floods during the period 1922-1962 were of lower magnitude. The flood occurred unusually early: 36-38 d prior to any previous annual flood since 1922. The stage difference between the flood's peak and the recessional baseflow was smaller than in those pre-dam years of similar magnitude or annual volume. However, the controlled flood was large from the perspective of the post-dam flood regime. The flood had a recurrence of 5.1 yr for the period between 1963 and 1999 and a similar magnitude flood had not occurred in 10 yr. The sediment flux of the flood was small in relation to pre-dam floods, and the suspended sand concentration was within the historical variance for flows of similar magnitude. This flood reworked fine-grained deposits that are primarily composed of sand, but the flood caused much less reworking of coarser grained deposits. Scour primarily occurred in the offshore parts of eddies, in many eddy return-current channels, and in some parts of the main channel. Return-current channels constitute important nursery habitats for the native fishery when baseflows are low, because these channels become areas of stagnant and warmer water. The number and area of these backwaters increased greatly after the flood. Fluvial marshes were extensively scoured because these habitats occur in the low elevation centers of eddies where velocities during the flood were large. Riparian shrubs that were inundated along the banks were not scoured, however, because these shrubs occur where flood velocities were very low and where deposition of suspended sediment occurred. Some physical changes persisted for several years, but other changes, such as the area of newly formed backwaters decreased quickly. Thus, the lasting effect of this flood varied among different small-scale fluvial environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)657-671
Number of pages15
JournalEcological Applications
Volume11
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

canyon
sediment transport
dam
eddy
backwater
baseflow
shrub
sand
habitat
scour
snowmelt
reworking
warm water
suspended sediment

Keywords

  • Colorado River
  • Ecosystem
  • Flood
  • Geomorphology
  • Glen Canyon Dam
  • Hydrology
  • Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Schmidt, J. C., Parnell, R. A., Grams, P. E., Hazel, J. E., Kaplinski, M. A., Stevens, L. E., & Hoffnagle, T. L. (2001). The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon: Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. Ecological Applications, 11(3), 657-671.

The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon : Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. / Schmidt, John C.; Parnell, Roderic A; Grams, Paul E.; Hazel, Joseph E.; Kaplinski, Matthew A.; Stevens, Lawrence E.; Hoffnagle, Timothy L.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2001, p. 657-671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmidt, JC, Parnell, RA, Grams, PE, Hazel, JE, Kaplinski, MA, Stevens, LE & Hoffnagle, TL 2001, 'The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon: Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change', Ecological Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 657-671.
Schmidt JC, Parnell RA, Grams PE, Hazel JE, Kaplinski MA, Stevens LE et al. The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon: Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. Ecological Applications. 2001;11(3):657-671.
Schmidt, John C. ; Parnell, Roderic A ; Grams, Paul E. ; Hazel, Joseph E. ; Kaplinski, Matthew A. ; Stevens, Lawrence E. ; Hoffnagle, Timothy L. / The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon : Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. In: Ecological Applications. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 657-671.
@article{569b611647984f25866fc5ed32a15a0d,
title = "The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon: Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change",
abstract = "The 1996 controlled flood released from Glen Canyon Dam into the Colorado River was a small magnitude, short duration event compared to pre-dam floods. The controlled flood was of lesser magnitude than a 1.25-yr recurrence, and only 10{\%} of the predam spring snowmelt floods during the period 1922-1962 were of lower magnitude. The flood occurred unusually early: 36-38 d prior to any previous annual flood since 1922. The stage difference between the flood's peak and the recessional baseflow was smaller than in those pre-dam years of similar magnitude or annual volume. However, the controlled flood was large from the perspective of the post-dam flood regime. The flood had a recurrence of 5.1 yr for the period between 1963 and 1999 and a similar magnitude flood had not occurred in 10 yr. The sediment flux of the flood was small in relation to pre-dam floods, and the suspended sand concentration was within the historical variance for flows of similar magnitude. This flood reworked fine-grained deposits that are primarily composed of sand, but the flood caused much less reworking of coarser grained deposits. Scour primarily occurred in the offshore parts of eddies, in many eddy return-current channels, and in some parts of the main channel. Return-current channels constitute important nursery habitats for the native fishery when baseflows are low, because these channels become areas of stagnant and warmer water. The number and area of these backwaters increased greatly after the flood. Fluvial marshes were extensively scoured because these habitats occur in the low elevation centers of eddies where velocities during the flood were large. Riparian shrubs that were inundated along the banks were not scoured, however, because these shrubs occur where flood velocities were very low and where deposition of suspended sediment occurred. Some physical changes persisted for several years, but other changes, such as the area of newly formed backwaters decreased quickly. Thus, the lasting effect of this flood varied among different small-scale fluvial environments.",
keywords = "Colorado River, Ecosystem, Flood, Geomorphology, Glen Canyon Dam, Hydrology, Management",
author = "Schmidt, {John C.} and Parnell, {Roderic A} and Grams, {Paul E.} and Hazel, {Joseph E.} and Kaplinski, {Matthew A.} and Stevens, {Lawrence E.} and Hoffnagle, {Timothy L.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "657--671",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 1996 controlled flood in grand canyon

T2 - Flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change

AU - Schmidt, John C.

AU - Parnell, Roderic A

AU - Grams, Paul E.

AU - Hazel, Joseph E.

AU - Kaplinski, Matthew A.

AU - Stevens, Lawrence E.

AU - Hoffnagle, Timothy L.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The 1996 controlled flood released from Glen Canyon Dam into the Colorado River was a small magnitude, short duration event compared to pre-dam floods. The controlled flood was of lesser magnitude than a 1.25-yr recurrence, and only 10% of the predam spring snowmelt floods during the period 1922-1962 were of lower magnitude. The flood occurred unusually early: 36-38 d prior to any previous annual flood since 1922. The stage difference between the flood's peak and the recessional baseflow was smaller than in those pre-dam years of similar magnitude or annual volume. However, the controlled flood was large from the perspective of the post-dam flood regime. The flood had a recurrence of 5.1 yr for the period between 1963 and 1999 and a similar magnitude flood had not occurred in 10 yr. The sediment flux of the flood was small in relation to pre-dam floods, and the suspended sand concentration was within the historical variance for flows of similar magnitude. This flood reworked fine-grained deposits that are primarily composed of sand, but the flood caused much less reworking of coarser grained deposits. Scour primarily occurred in the offshore parts of eddies, in many eddy return-current channels, and in some parts of the main channel. Return-current channels constitute important nursery habitats for the native fishery when baseflows are low, because these channels become areas of stagnant and warmer water. The number and area of these backwaters increased greatly after the flood. Fluvial marshes were extensively scoured because these habitats occur in the low elevation centers of eddies where velocities during the flood were large. Riparian shrubs that were inundated along the banks were not scoured, however, because these shrubs occur where flood velocities were very low and where deposition of suspended sediment occurred. Some physical changes persisted for several years, but other changes, such as the area of newly formed backwaters decreased quickly. Thus, the lasting effect of this flood varied among different small-scale fluvial environments.

AB - The 1996 controlled flood released from Glen Canyon Dam into the Colorado River was a small magnitude, short duration event compared to pre-dam floods. The controlled flood was of lesser magnitude than a 1.25-yr recurrence, and only 10% of the predam spring snowmelt floods during the period 1922-1962 were of lower magnitude. The flood occurred unusually early: 36-38 d prior to any previous annual flood since 1922. The stage difference between the flood's peak and the recessional baseflow was smaller than in those pre-dam years of similar magnitude or annual volume. However, the controlled flood was large from the perspective of the post-dam flood regime. The flood had a recurrence of 5.1 yr for the period between 1963 and 1999 and a similar magnitude flood had not occurred in 10 yr. The sediment flux of the flood was small in relation to pre-dam floods, and the suspended sand concentration was within the historical variance for flows of similar magnitude. This flood reworked fine-grained deposits that are primarily composed of sand, but the flood caused much less reworking of coarser grained deposits. Scour primarily occurred in the offshore parts of eddies, in many eddy return-current channels, and in some parts of the main channel. Return-current channels constitute important nursery habitats for the native fishery when baseflows are low, because these channels become areas of stagnant and warmer water. The number and area of these backwaters increased greatly after the flood. Fluvial marshes were extensively scoured because these habitats occur in the low elevation centers of eddies where velocities during the flood were large. Riparian shrubs that were inundated along the banks were not scoured, however, because these shrubs occur where flood velocities were very low and where deposition of suspended sediment occurred. Some physical changes persisted for several years, but other changes, such as the area of newly formed backwaters decreased quickly. Thus, the lasting effect of this flood varied among different small-scale fluvial environments.

KW - Colorado River

KW - Ecosystem

KW - Flood

KW - Geomorphology

KW - Glen Canyon Dam

KW - Hydrology

KW - Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034979895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034979895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 657

EP - 671

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 3

ER -