Technology and tenure: Creating oppositional discourse in an offline and online world

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, I look at the complexity of the technorhetorician's place within academic institutions that promote traditional retention, promotion, and tenure procedures. First, I point out the shortcomings of current positionalities assigned to technorhetoricians. I then expand on theories of opposition as defined by Chela Sandoval (1994) in "Re-entering Cyberspace: Sciences of Resistance." I use this framework to look at the problems when creating binaries to identify online and offline work as traditional or marginal. I argue that we are a diverse and multilayered group whose members occupy many positions, emphasizing the shifting and sometimes contradictory nature of marginality in cyberspace. I conclude by pointing out possible effects of our diverse positionalities on our retention, tenure, and promotion efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-55
Number of pages15
JournalComputers and Composition
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Differential movement
  • Evaluation procedures
  • Ideological frameworks
  • Marginality in cyberspace
  • Technology and tenure
  • Theories of opposition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this