Sustainable Colonization

Tar Sands as Resource Colonialism

Sean M Parson, Emily Ray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Canada is one of the world’s largest petrostates, owing to large shale oil deposits, also known as tar sands, which can be found within its borders. In recent decades, as the price of crude oil has increased dramatically, corporations and the Canadian state have worked together to open the oil deposits in Northern Canada for extraction and transportation. Despite a stated commitment to environmental sustainability by the United States and Canadian governments, both have endorsed tar sands extraction and transport. Government and corporate entities have tried to reframe tar sands as “ethical oil,” yet all steps in the process involved pose tremendous ecological, social, economic, and cultural threats to First Nations communities in Canada, landowners in the Midwest and Texas, local ecosystems, and the global climate. This practice is part of a long-standing pattern of appropriating and using public and First Nations land for economic development. We argue that tar sands production on First Nations land is a practice of resource colonialism: the theft and appropriation of land belonging to indigenous people in order to access natural resources. By branding tar sands as “ethical oil” and labeling production companies as “sustainable,” the public and private sectors bound up in the extractive economy claim to provide an essential public service while misdirecting attention away from acts of colonialism that make these resources available. In this article, we examine the ways in which corporate and state entities use the discourse of sustainability as a cover for continued resource colonialism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalCapitalism, Nature, Socialism
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 17 2016

Fingerprint

colonialism
colonial age
colonization
Canada
resource
sustainability
resources
crude oil
larceny
oil
social economics
public service
natural resources
corporation
private sector
public sector
government and state
climate
commitment
threat

Keywords

  • colonialism
  • green washing
  • sustainability
  • Tar sands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Sustainable Colonization : Tar Sands as Resource Colonialism. / Parson, Sean M; Ray, Emily.

In: Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 17.12.2016, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8717479999440fa877809ba1e90aff9,
title = "Sustainable Colonization: Tar Sands as Resource Colonialism",
abstract = "Canada is one of the world’s largest petrostates, owing to large shale oil deposits, also known as tar sands, which can be found within its borders. In recent decades, as the price of crude oil has increased dramatically, corporations and the Canadian state have worked together to open the oil deposits in Northern Canada for extraction and transportation. Despite a stated commitment to environmental sustainability by the United States and Canadian governments, both have endorsed tar sands extraction and transport. Government and corporate entities have tried to reframe tar sands as “ethical oil,” yet all steps in the process involved pose tremendous ecological, social, economic, and cultural threats to First Nations communities in Canada, landowners in the Midwest and Texas, local ecosystems, and the global climate. This practice is part of a long-standing pattern of appropriating and using public and First Nations land for economic development. We argue that tar sands production on First Nations land is a practice of resource colonialism: the theft and appropriation of land belonging to indigenous people in order to access natural resources. By branding tar sands as “ethical oil” and labeling production companies as “sustainable,” the public and private sectors bound up in the extractive economy claim to provide an essential public service while misdirecting attention away from acts of colonialism that make these resources available. In this article, we examine the ways in which corporate and state entities use the discourse of sustainability as a cover for continued resource colonialism.",
keywords = "colonialism, green washing, sustainability, Tar sands",
author = "Parson, {Sean M} and Emily Ray",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/10455752.2016.1268187",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Capitalism, Nature, Socialism",
issn = "1045-5752",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable Colonization

T2 - Tar Sands as Resource Colonialism

AU - Parson, Sean M

AU - Ray, Emily

PY - 2016/12/17

Y1 - 2016/12/17

N2 - Canada is one of the world’s largest petrostates, owing to large shale oil deposits, also known as tar sands, which can be found within its borders. In recent decades, as the price of crude oil has increased dramatically, corporations and the Canadian state have worked together to open the oil deposits in Northern Canada for extraction and transportation. Despite a stated commitment to environmental sustainability by the United States and Canadian governments, both have endorsed tar sands extraction and transport. Government and corporate entities have tried to reframe tar sands as “ethical oil,” yet all steps in the process involved pose tremendous ecological, social, economic, and cultural threats to First Nations communities in Canada, landowners in the Midwest and Texas, local ecosystems, and the global climate. This practice is part of a long-standing pattern of appropriating and using public and First Nations land for economic development. We argue that tar sands production on First Nations land is a practice of resource colonialism: the theft and appropriation of land belonging to indigenous people in order to access natural resources. By branding tar sands as “ethical oil” and labeling production companies as “sustainable,” the public and private sectors bound up in the extractive economy claim to provide an essential public service while misdirecting attention away from acts of colonialism that make these resources available. In this article, we examine the ways in which corporate and state entities use the discourse of sustainability as a cover for continued resource colonialism.

AB - Canada is one of the world’s largest petrostates, owing to large shale oil deposits, also known as tar sands, which can be found within its borders. In recent decades, as the price of crude oil has increased dramatically, corporations and the Canadian state have worked together to open the oil deposits in Northern Canada for extraction and transportation. Despite a stated commitment to environmental sustainability by the United States and Canadian governments, both have endorsed tar sands extraction and transport. Government and corporate entities have tried to reframe tar sands as “ethical oil,” yet all steps in the process involved pose tremendous ecological, social, economic, and cultural threats to First Nations communities in Canada, landowners in the Midwest and Texas, local ecosystems, and the global climate. This practice is part of a long-standing pattern of appropriating and using public and First Nations land for economic development. We argue that tar sands production on First Nations land is a practice of resource colonialism: the theft and appropriation of land belonging to indigenous people in order to access natural resources. By branding tar sands as “ethical oil” and labeling production companies as “sustainable,” the public and private sectors bound up in the extractive economy claim to provide an essential public service while misdirecting attention away from acts of colonialism that make these resources available. In this article, we examine the ways in which corporate and state entities use the discourse of sustainability as a cover for continued resource colonialism.

KW - colonialism

KW - green washing

KW - sustainability

KW - Tar sands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006857065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006857065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10455752.2016.1268187

DO - 10.1080/10455752.2016.1268187

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Capitalism, Nature, Socialism

JF - Capitalism, Nature, Socialism

SN - 1045-5752

ER -