Survival rates indicate that correlations between community-weighted mean traits and environments can be unreliable estimates of the adaptive value of traits

Daniel C. Laughlin, Robert T. Strahan, Peter B. Adler, Margaret M Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Correlations between community-weighted mean (CWM) traits and environmental gradients are often assumed to quantify the adaptive value of traits. We tested this assumption by comparing these correlations with models of survival probability using 46 perennial species from long-term permanent plots in pine forests of Arizona. Survival was modelled as a function of trait × environment interactions, plant size, climatic variation and neighbourhood competition. The effect of traits on survival depended on the environmental conditions, but the two statistical approaches were inconsistent. For example, CWM-specific leaf area (SLA) and soil fertility were uncorrelated. However, survival was highest for species with low SLA in infertile soil, a result which agreed with expectations derived from the physiological trade-off underpinning leaf economic theory. CWM trait–environment relationships were unreliable estimates of how traits affected survival, and should only be used in predictive models when there is empirical support for an evolutionary trade-off that affects vital rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-421
Number of pages11
JournalEcology Letters
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

fitness
leaf area
survival rate
economic theory
coniferous forests
soil fertility
trade-off
environmental factors
leaves
soil
environmental gradient
environmental conditions
rate

Keywords

  • Community assembly
  • environmental filtering
  • flowering phenology
  • functional traits
  • plant demography
  • soil C : N ratio
  • species interactions
  • specific leaf area
  • specific root length

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Survival rates indicate that correlations between community-weighted mean traits and environments can be unreliable estimates of the adaptive value of traits. / Laughlin, Daniel C.; Strahan, Robert T.; Adler, Peter B.; Moore, Margaret M.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 411-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

@article{391f9bb4a9ae4ee7bda0c7e8f6015a34,
title = "Survival rates indicate that correlations between community-weighted mean traits and environments can be unreliable estimates of the adaptive value of traits",
abstract = "Correlations between community-weighted mean (CWM) traits and environmental gradients are often assumed to quantify the adaptive value of traits. We tested this assumption by comparing these correlations with models of survival probability using 46 perennial species from long-term permanent plots in pine forests of Arizona. Survival was modelled as a function of trait × environment interactions, plant size, climatic variation and neighbourhood competition. The effect of traits on survival depended on the environmental conditions, but the two statistical approaches were inconsistent. For example, CWM-specific leaf area (SLA) and soil fertility were uncorrelated. However, survival was highest for species with low SLA in infertile soil, a result which agreed with expectations derived from the physiological trade-off underpinning leaf economic theory. CWM trait–environment relationships were unreliable estimates of how traits affected survival, and should only be used in predictive models when there is empirical support for an evolutionary trade-off that affects vital rates.",
keywords = "Community assembly, environmental filtering, flowering phenology, functional traits, plant demography, soil C : N ratio, species interactions, specific leaf area, specific root length",
author = "Laughlin, {Daniel C.} and Strahan, {Robert T.} and Adler, {Peter B.} and Moore, {Margaret M}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ele.12914",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "411--421",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survival rates indicate that correlations between community-weighted mean traits and environments can be unreliable estimates of the adaptive value of traits

AU - Laughlin, Daniel C.

AU - Strahan, Robert T.

AU - Adler, Peter B.

AU - Moore, Margaret M

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Correlations between community-weighted mean (CWM) traits and environmental gradients are often assumed to quantify the adaptive value of traits. We tested this assumption by comparing these correlations with models of survival probability using 46 perennial species from long-term permanent plots in pine forests of Arizona. Survival was modelled as a function of trait × environment interactions, plant size, climatic variation and neighbourhood competition. The effect of traits on survival depended on the environmental conditions, but the two statistical approaches were inconsistent. For example, CWM-specific leaf area (SLA) and soil fertility were uncorrelated. However, survival was highest for species with low SLA in infertile soil, a result which agreed with expectations derived from the physiological trade-off underpinning leaf economic theory. CWM trait–environment relationships were unreliable estimates of how traits affected survival, and should only be used in predictive models when there is empirical support for an evolutionary trade-off that affects vital rates.

AB - Correlations between community-weighted mean (CWM) traits and environmental gradients are often assumed to quantify the adaptive value of traits. We tested this assumption by comparing these correlations with models of survival probability using 46 perennial species from long-term permanent plots in pine forests of Arizona. Survival was modelled as a function of trait × environment interactions, plant size, climatic variation and neighbourhood competition. The effect of traits on survival depended on the environmental conditions, but the two statistical approaches were inconsistent. For example, CWM-specific leaf area (SLA) and soil fertility were uncorrelated. However, survival was highest for species with low SLA in infertile soil, a result which agreed with expectations derived from the physiological trade-off underpinning leaf economic theory. CWM trait–environment relationships were unreliable estimates of how traits affected survival, and should only be used in predictive models when there is empirical support for an evolutionary trade-off that affects vital rates.

KW - Community assembly

KW - environmental filtering

KW - flowering phenology

KW - functional traits

KW - plant demography

KW - soil C : N ratio

KW - species interactions

KW - specific leaf area

KW - specific root length

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041211317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041211317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.12914

DO - 10.1111/ele.12914

M3 - Letter

C2 - 29359502

AN - SCOPUS:85041211317

VL - 21

SP - 411

EP - 421

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 3

ER -