Strut-and-tie model design provisions

Robin G Tuchscherer, David B. Birrcher, Oguzhan Bayrak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × 1070 mm), and 21 in. × 23 in. (530 mm × 580 mm). These tests represent some of the largest deep-beam shear tests ever conducted. Based on an analysis of the database and the experimental program, the deepbeam shear provisions in Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-08) and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were found to be overly conservative. Thus, a new and simple strutand-tie modeling (STM) procedure was proposed for the strength design of deep-beam regions. The procedure is largely based on the fib structural concrete design provisions. It is more accurate than the STM design method in ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications but just as conservative. With the use of the proposed provisions, the design of deep beams is more efficient and reliable. As a result, implementation of the new design provisions into ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-170
Number of pages16
JournalPCI Journal
Volume56
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Struts
Specifications
Reinforced concrete
Concretes

Keywords

  • Deep beam
  • Efficiency factors
  • Shear
  • STM
  • Strut-andtie modeling
  • Triaxial confinement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Tuchscherer, R. G., Birrcher, D. B., & Bayrak, O. (2011). Strut-and-tie model design provisions. PCI Journal, 56(1), 155-170.

Strut-and-tie model design provisions. / Tuchscherer, Robin G; Birrcher, David B.; Bayrak, Oguzhan.

In: PCI Journal, Vol. 56, No. 1, 12.2011, p. 155-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tuchscherer, RG, Birrcher, DB & Bayrak, O 2011, 'Strut-and-tie model design provisions', PCI Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 155-170.
Tuchscherer RG, Birrcher DB, Bayrak O. Strut-and-tie model design provisions. PCI Journal. 2011 Dec;56(1):155-170.
Tuchscherer, Robin G ; Birrcher, David B. ; Bayrak, Oguzhan. / Strut-and-tie model design provisions. In: PCI Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 155-170.
@article{fc4700776f2141cd82a8bcb18cb717c2,
title = "Strut-and-tie model design provisions",
abstract = "The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × 1070 mm), and 21 in. × 23 in. (530 mm × 580 mm). These tests represent some of the largest deep-beam shear tests ever conducted. Based on an analysis of the database and the experimental program, the deepbeam shear provisions in Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-08) and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were found to be overly conservative. Thus, a new and simple strutand-tie modeling (STM) procedure was proposed for the strength design of deep-beam regions. The procedure is largely based on the fib structural concrete design provisions. It is more accurate than the STM design method in ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications but just as conservative. With the use of the proposed provisions, the design of deep beams is more efficient and reliable. As a result, implementation of the new design provisions into ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications is recommended.",
keywords = "Deep beam, Efficiency factors, Shear, STM, Strut-andtie modeling, Triaxial confinement",
author = "Tuchscherer, {Robin G} and Birrcher, {David B.} and Oguzhan Bayrak",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "155--170",
journal = "Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute",
issn = "0887-9672",
publisher = "Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strut-and-tie model design provisions

AU - Tuchscherer, Robin G

AU - Birrcher, David B.

AU - Bayrak, Oguzhan

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × 1070 mm), and 21 in. × 23 in. (530 mm × 580 mm). These tests represent some of the largest deep-beam shear tests ever conducted. Based on an analysis of the database and the experimental program, the deepbeam shear provisions in Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-08) and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were found to be overly conservative. Thus, a new and simple strutand-tie modeling (STM) procedure was proposed for the strength design of deep-beam regions. The procedure is largely based on the fib structural concrete design provisions. It is more accurate than the STM design method in ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications but just as conservative. With the use of the proposed provisions, the design of deep beams is more efficient and reliable. As a result, implementation of the new design provisions into ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications is recommended.

AB - The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × The overall objective of the research project summarized in this paper was to develop simple and safe design guidelines for deep beams. To accomplish the research objective and related tasks, a database of 868 deep-beam tests was assembled from previous research. In addition, 37 beams were fabricated and tested with the following cross-sectional dimensions: 36 in. × 48 in. (910 mm × 1220 mm), 21 in. × 75 in. (530 mm × 1910 mm), 21 in. × 42 in. (530 mm × 1070 mm), and 21 in. × 23 in. (530 mm × 580 mm). These tests represent some of the largest deep-beam shear tests ever conducted. Based on an analysis of the database and the experimental program, the deepbeam shear provisions in Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-08) and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were found to be overly conservative. Thus, a new and simple strutand-tie modeling (STM) procedure was proposed for the strength design of deep-beam regions. The procedure is largely based on the fib structural concrete design provisions. It is more accurate than the STM design method in ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications but just as conservative. With the use of the proposed provisions, the design of deep beams is more efficient and reliable. As a result, implementation of the new design provisions into ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD specifications is recommended.

KW - Deep beam

KW - Efficiency factors

KW - Shear

KW - STM

KW - Strut-andtie modeling

KW - Triaxial confinement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951905842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951905842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79951905842

VL - 56

SP - 155

EP - 170

JO - Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute

JF - Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute

SN - 0887-9672

IS - 1

ER -