Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke

Samuel D. Schaffer, Simon D. Holzapfel, George Fulk, Pamela R Bosch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The increasing popularity of activity tracking devices presents an opportunity to monitor physical activity in patients after stroke. We sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Garmin Vivofit and Fitbit Zip for adults after stroke. Methods: Twenty-four participants with stroke-induced hemiparesis wore a Fitbit Zip on the nonparetic hip and Garmin Vivofits on both wrists during a 6-minute walk test to determine the accuracy of the devices against video-determined step counts. Participants also wore the devices during two trials of exactly 50 steps to determine the reliability of the devices. Results: Fitbit Zip showed excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.974) and accuracy (4.2% error) for participants who walked faster than 0.35 m/s. Garmin Vivofit (nonparetic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.964) but poor accuracy (≤−16.0%) for all participants. Garmin Vivofit (paretic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.858) and accuracy (−4.0% error) for faster walkers (>0.48 m/s) but poor accuracy (−68.2%) for slower walkers. Conclusion: Fitbit Zip was more accurate and reliable for persons with stroke than Garmin Vivofit, but slower walking speeds were associated with greater undercounting of steps for both devices. The Fitbit Zip is appropriate for counting steps in adults poststroke who range from household to community ambulators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)788-796
Number of pages9
JournalPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2017

Fingerprint

Stroke
Equipment and Supplies
Walkers
Paresis
Wrist
Hip
Exercise

Keywords

  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • physical activity
  • step counter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. / Schaffer, Samuel D.; Holzapfel, Simon D.; Fulk, George; Bosch, Pamela R.

In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 10, 03.10.2017, p. 788-796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schaffer, Samuel D. ; Holzapfel, Simon D. ; Fulk, George ; Bosch, Pamela R. / Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 788-796.
@article{2744781cb8554377945951d2849f18cd,
title = "Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: The increasing popularity of activity tracking devices presents an opportunity to monitor physical activity in patients after stroke. We sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Garmin Vivofit and Fitbit Zip for adults after stroke. Methods: Twenty-four participants with stroke-induced hemiparesis wore a Fitbit Zip on the nonparetic hip and Garmin Vivofits on both wrists during a 6-minute walk test to determine the accuracy of the devices against video-determined step counts. Participants also wore the devices during two trials of exactly 50 steps to determine the reliability of the devices. Results: Fitbit Zip showed excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.974) and accuracy (4.2{\%} error) for participants who walked faster than 0.35 m/s. Garmin Vivofit (nonparetic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.964) but poor accuracy (≤−16.0{\%}) for all participants. Garmin Vivofit (paretic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.858) and accuracy (−4.0{\%} error) for faster walkers (>0.48 m/s) but poor accuracy (−68.2{\%}) for slower walkers. Conclusion: Fitbit Zip was more accurate and reliable for persons with stroke than Garmin Vivofit, but slower walking speeds were associated with greater undercounting of steps for both devices. The Fitbit Zip is appropriate for counting steps in adults poststroke who range from household to community ambulators.",
keywords = "Cerebrovascular accident, physical activity, step counter",
author = "Schaffer, {Samuel D.} and Holzapfel, {Simon D.} and George Fulk and Bosch, {Pamela R}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09593985.2017.1354412",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "788--796",
journal = "Physiotherapy Theory and Practice",
issn = "0959-3985",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke

AU - Schaffer, Samuel D.

AU - Holzapfel, Simon D.

AU - Fulk, George

AU - Bosch, Pamela R

PY - 2017/10/3

Y1 - 2017/10/3

N2 - Background/Purpose: The increasing popularity of activity tracking devices presents an opportunity to monitor physical activity in patients after stroke. We sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Garmin Vivofit and Fitbit Zip for adults after stroke. Methods: Twenty-four participants with stroke-induced hemiparesis wore a Fitbit Zip on the nonparetic hip and Garmin Vivofits on both wrists during a 6-minute walk test to determine the accuracy of the devices against video-determined step counts. Participants also wore the devices during two trials of exactly 50 steps to determine the reliability of the devices. Results: Fitbit Zip showed excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.974) and accuracy (4.2% error) for participants who walked faster than 0.35 m/s. Garmin Vivofit (nonparetic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.964) but poor accuracy (≤−16.0%) for all participants. Garmin Vivofit (paretic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.858) and accuracy (−4.0% error) for faster walkers (>0.48 m/s) but poor accuracy (−68.2%) for slower walkers. Conclusion: Fitbit Zip was more accurate and reliable for persons with stroke than Garmin Vivofit, but slower walking speeds were associated with greater undercounting of steps for both devices. The Fitbit Zip is appropriate for counting steps in adults poststroke who range from household to community ambulators.

AB - Background/Purpose: The increasing popularity of activity tracking devices presents an opportunity to monitor physical activity in patients after stroke. We sought to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Garmin Vivofit and Fitbit Zip for adults after stroke. Methods: Twenty-four participants with stroke-induced hemiparesis wore a Fitbit Zip on the nonparetic hip and Garmin Vivofits on both wrists during a 6-minute walk test to determine the accuracy of the devices against video-determined step counts. Participants also wore the devices during two trials of exactly 50 steps to determine the reliability of the devices. Results: Fitbit Zip showed excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.974) and accuracy (4.2% error) for participants who walked faster than 0.35 m/s. Garmin Vivofit (nonparetic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.964) but poor accuracy (≤−16.0%) for all participants. Garmin Vivofit (paretic side) had excellent reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.858) and accuracy (−4.0% error) for faster walkers (>0.48 m/s) but poor accuracy (−68.2%) for slower walkers. Conclusion: Fitbit Zip was more accurate and reliable for persons with stroke than Garmin Vivofit, but slower walking speeds were associated with greater undercounting of steps for both devices. The Fitbit Zip is appropriate for counting steps in adults poststroke who range from household to community ambulators.

KW - Cerebrovascular accident

KW - physical activity

KW - step counter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026861450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026861450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09593985.2017.1354412

DO - 10.1080/09593985.2017.1354412

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 788

EP - 796

JO - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

JF - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

SN - 0959-3985

IS - 10

ER -