Stand management alternatives for multiple resources

integrated management experiments

W. McComb, J. Tappeiner, L. Kellogg, Carol L Chambers, R. Johnson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study describes the conceptual approach, logistics, and some preliminary results of an experiment designed to compare costs and biological and human responses among three stand management strategies along the east side of the central Coast Range of Oregon and in the central Oregon Cascade Range. In the Coast Range study tests are conducted for clear cut with reserve green trees, two-story, and group selection systems. In the Cascades, a study in young plantations was conducted in an attempt to restore old-forest structure and composition. The structural development of the stands and the species of wildlife that they support will be the basis for deciding if, when, and where these types of stand management approaches should be attempted over large spatial scales to meet the needs of species' individual territory sizes larger than a stand. Stands developed by using these techniques should be considered the potential building blocks for a designed landscape. How the development, implementation, and particularly monitoring of prescriptions can be coordinated among harvesting specialists, silviculturists, wildlife biologists, recreation specialists, and professionals in other disciplines are described. -from Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeneral Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Pages71-86
Number of pages16
EditionPNW-GTR-336
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

group selection
coast
resource
logistics
plantation
experiment
monitoring
cost
wildlife
integrated management
prescription
recreation
test
young
need

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

McComb, W., Tappeiner, J., Kellogg, L., Chambers, C. L., & Johnson, R. (1994). Stand management alternatives for multiple resources: integrated management experiments. In General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (PNW-GTR-336 ed., pp. 71-86)

Stand management alternatives for multiple resources : integrated management experiments. / McComb, W.; Tappeiner, J.; Kellogg, L.; Chambers, Carol L; Johnson, R.

General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. PNW-GTR-336. ed. 1994. p. 71-86.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

McComb, W, Tappeiner, J, Kellogg, L, Chambers, CL & Johnson, R 1994, Stand management alternatives for multiple resources: integrated management experiments. in General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. PNW-GTR-336 edn, pp. 71-86.
McComb W, Tappeiner J, Kellogg L, Chambers CL, Johnson R. Stand management alternatives for multiple resources: integrated management experiments. In General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. PNW-GTR-336 ed. 1994. p. 71-86
McComb, W. ; Tappeiner, J. ; Kellogg, L. ; Chambers, Carol L ; Johnson, R. / Stand management alternatives for multiple resources : integrated management experiments. General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. PNW-GTR-336. ed. 1994. pp. 71-86
@inbook{2a4ef44b8c0947768558843e6c93cd33,
title = "Stand management alternatives for multiple resources: integrated management experiments",
abstract = "This study describes the conceptual approach, logistics, and some preliminary results of an experiment designed to compare costs and biological and human responses among three stand management strategies along the east side of the central Coast Range of Oregon and in the central Oregon Cascade Range. In the Coast Range study tests are conducted for clear cut with reserve green trees, two-story, and group selection systems. In the Cascades, a study in young plantations was conducted in an attempt to restore old-forest structure and composition. The structural development of the stands and the species of wildlife that they support will be the basis for deciding if, when, and where these types of stand management approaches should be attempted over large spatial scales to meet the needs of species' individual territory sizes larger than a stand. Stands developed by using these techniques should be considered the potential building blocks for a designed landscape. How the development, implementation, and particularly monitoring of prescriptions can be coordinated among harvesting specialists, silviculturists, wildlife biologists, recreation specialists, and professionals in other disciplines are described. -from Authors",
author = "W. McComb and J. Tappeiner and L. Kellogg and Chambers, {Carol L} and R. Johnson",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "71--86",
booktitle = "General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service",
edition = "PNW-GTR-336",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Stand management alternatives for multiple resources

T2 - integrated management experiments

AU - McComb, W.

AU - Tappeiner, J.

AU - Kellogg, L.

AU - Chambers, Carol L

AU - Johnson, R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - This study describes the conceptual approach, logistics, and some preliminary results of an experiment designed to compare costs and biological and human responses among three stand management strategies along the east side of the central Coast Range of Oregon and in the central Oregon Cascade Range. In the Coast Range study tests are conducted for clear cut with reserve green trees, two-story, and group selection systems. In the Cascades, a study in young plantations was conducted in an attempt to restore old-forest structure and composition. The structural development of the stands and the species of wildlife that they support will be the basis for deciding if, when, and where these types of stand management approaches should be attempted over large spatial scales to meet the needs of species' individual territory sizes larger than a stand. Stands developed by using these techniques should be considered the potential building blocks for a designed landscape. How the development, implementation, and particularly monitoring of prescriptions can be coordinated among harvesting specialists, silviculturists, wildlife biologists, recreation specialists, and professionals in other disciplines are described. -from Authors

AB - This study describes the conceptual approach, logistics, and some preliminary results of an experiment designed to compare costs and biological and human responses among three stand management strategies along the east side of the central Coast Range of Oregon and in the central Oregon Cascade Range. In the Coast Range study tests are conducted for clear cut with reserve green trees, two-story, and group selection systems. In the Cascades, a study in young plantations was conducted in an attempt to restore old-forest structure and composition. The structural development of the stands and the species of wildlife that they support will be the basis for deciding if, when, and where these types of stand management approaches should be attempted over large spatial scales to meet the needs of species' individual territory sizes larger than a stand. Stands developed by using these techniques should be considered the potential building blocks for a designed landscape. How the development, implementation, and particularly monitoring of prescriptions can be coordinated among harvesting specialists, silviculturists, wildlife biologists, recreation specialists, and professionals in other disciplines are described. -from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028571967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028571967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SP - 71

EP - 86

BT - General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service

ER -