Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects

Annika Gustafsson, David E Trilling, Michael Mommert, Andrew McNeill, Joseph L. Hora, Howard A. Smith, Stephan Hellmich, Stefano Mottola, Alan W. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Thermal infrared observations are the most effective way to measure asteroid diameter and albedo for a large number of near-Earth objects (NEOs). Major surveys like NEOWISE, NEOSurvey, ExploreNEOs, and NEOLegacy find a small fraction of high albedo objects that do not have clear analogs in the current meteorite population. About 8% of Spitzer-observed NEOs have nominal albedo solutions greater than 0.5. This may be a result of light-curve variability leading to an incorrect estimate of diameter or inaccurate absolute visual magnitudes. For a sample of 23 high-albedo NEOs we do not find that their shapes are significantly different from the McNeill et al. NEO shape distribution. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis on 1505 NEOs observed by Spitzer, sampling the visible and thermal fluxes of all targets to determine the likelihood of obtaining a high albedo erroneously. Implementing the McNeill shape distribution for NEOs, we provide an upper limit on the geometric albedo of 0.5 0.1 for the near-Earth population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number67
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume158
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

near Earth objects
albedo
Monte Carlo analysis
meteorites
asteroids
light curve
asteroid
meteorite
sampling
analogs
estimates

Keywords

  • asteroids: Near-Earth Objects
  • Astronomical Methods: Infrared Astronomy, Visible Astronomy
  • Astronomical Reference Material: Surveys
  • Astronomical Techniques: Photometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Gustafsson, A., Trilling, D. E., Mommert, M., McNeill, A., Hora, J. L., Smith, H. A., ... Harris, A. W. (2019). Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects. Astronomical Journal, 158(2), [67]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea

Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects. / Gustafsson, Annika; Trilling, David E; Mommert, Michael; McNeill, Andrew; Hora, Joseph L.; Smith, Howard A.; Hellmich, Stephan; Mottola, Stefano; Harris, Alan W.

In: Astronomical Journal, Vol. 158, No. 2, 67, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gustafsson, A, Trilling, DE, Mommert, M, McNeill, A, Hora, JL, Smith, HA, Hellmich, S, Mottola, S & Harris, AW 2019, 'Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects', Astronomical Journal, vol. 158, no. 2, 67. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea
Gustafsson A, Trilling DE, Mommert M, McNeill A, Hora JL, Smith HA et al. Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects. Astronomical Journal. 2019 Jan 1;158(2). 67. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea
Gustafsson, Annika ; Trilling, David E ; Mommert, Michael ; McNeill, Andrew ; Hora, Joseph L. ; Smith, Howard A. ; Hellmich, Stephan ; Mottola, Stefano ; Harris, Alan W. / Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects. In: Astronomical Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 158, No. 2.
@article{335f6b0219834ae8b47159512658ff9e,
title = "Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects",
abstract = "Thermal infrared observations are the most effective way to measure asteroid diameter and albedo for a large number of near-Earth objects (NEOs). Major surveys like NEOWISE, NEOSurvey, ExploreNEOs, and NEOLegacy find a small fraction of high albedo objects that do not have clear analogs in the current meteorite population. About 8{\%} of Spitzer-observed NEOs have nominal albedo solutions greater than 0.5. This may be a result of light-curve variability leading to an incorrect estimate of diameter or inaccurate absolute visual magnitudes. For a sample of 23 high-albedo NEOs we do not find that their shapes are significantly different from the McNeill et al. NEO shape distribution. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis on 1505 NEOs observed by Spitzer, sampling the visible and thermal fluxes of all targets to determine the likelihood of obtaining a high albedo erroneously. Implementing the McNeill shape distribution for NEOs, we provide an upper limit on the geometric albedo of 0.5 0.1 for the near-Earth population.",
keywords = "asteroids: Near-Earth Objects, Astronomical Methods: Infrared Astronomy, Visible Astronomy, Astronomical Reference Material: Surveys, Astronomical Techniques: Photometry",
author = "Annika Gustafsson and Trilling, {David E} and Michael Mommert and Andrew McNeill and Hora, {Joseph L.} and Smith, {Howard A.} and Stephan Hellmich and Stefano Mottola and Harris, {Alan W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
journal = "Astronomical Journal",
issn = "0004-6256",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects

AU - Gustafsson, Annika

AU - Trilling, David E

AU - Mommert, Michael

AU - McNeill, Andrew

AU - Hora, Joseph L.

AU - Smith, Howard A.

AU - Hellmich, Stephan

AU - Mottola, Stefano

AU - Harris, Alan W.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Thermal infrared observations are the most effective way to measure asteroid diameter and albedo for a large number of near-Earth objects (NEOs). Major surveys like NEOWISE, NEOSurvey, ExploreNEOs, and NEOLegacy find a small fraction of high albedo objects that do not have clear analogs in the current meteorite population. About 8% of Spitzer-observed NEOs have nominal albedo solutions greater than 0.5. This may be a result of light-curve variability leading to an incorrect estimate of diameter or inaccurate absolute visual magnitudes. For a sample of 23 high-albedo NEOs we do not find that their shapes are significantly different from the McNeill et al. NEO shape distribution. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis on 1505 NEOs observed by Spitzer, sampling the visible and thermal fluxes of all targets to determine the likelihood of obtaining a high albedo erroneously. Implementing the McNeill shape distribution for NEOs, we provide an upper limit on the geometric albedo of 0.5 0.1 for the near-Earth population.

AB - Thermal infrared observations are the most effective way to measure asteroid diameter and albedo for a large number of near-Earth objects (NEOs). Major surveys like NEOWISE, NEOSurvey, ExploreNEOs, and NEOLegacy find a small fraction of high albedo objects that do not have clear analogs in the current meteorite population. About 8% of Spitzer-observed NEOs have nominal albedo solutions greater than 0.5. This may be a result of light-curve variability leading to an incorrect estimate of diameter or inaccurate absolute visual magnitudes. For a sample of 23 high-albedo NEOs we do not find that their shapes are significantly different from the McNeill et al. NEO shape distribution. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis on 1505 NEOs observed by Spitzer, sampling the visible and thermal fluxes of all targets to determine the likelihood of obtaining a high albedo erroneously. Implementing the McNeill shape distribution for NEOs, we provide an upper limit on the geometric albedo of 0.5 0.1 for the near-Earth population.

KW - asteroids: Near-Earth Objects

KW - Astronomical Methods: Infrared Astronomy, Visible Astronomy

KW - Astronomical Reference Material: Surveys

KW - Astronomical Techniques: Photometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072053659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072053659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea

DO - 10.3847/1538-3881/ab29ea

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072053659

VL - 158

JO - Astronomical Journal

JF - Astronomical Journal

SN - 0004-6256

IS - 2

M1 - 67

ER -