Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands

N. J. Enright, E. Mosner, B. P. Miller, Nancy Johnson, Byron B. Lamont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fire-prone shrublands of southwestern Australia are renowned for their high plant species diversity and prominence of canopy seed storage (serotiny). We compared species richness, abundance, and life history attributes for soil and canopy seed banks in relation to extant vegetation among four sites with different substrate conditions and high species turnover (50-80%) to identify whether this unusual community-level organization of seed storage might contribute to maintenance of high species richness. Soil seed bank (SSB) densities were low to moderate (233-1435 seeds/m2) compared with densities for other Mediterranean-type vegetation and were lowest for sites with highest canopy seed bank (CSB) species richness and lowest nutrient availability, but not richness or abundance of resprouters. Annuals were infrequent in the lowest nutrient sites, but there was no evidence that small SSB size was due to low seed inputs or a trade-off between seed production/storage and seed size in response to low nutrient availability. Sorensen's similarity between SSB and extant vegetation was 26-43% but increased to 54-57% when the CSB was included, representing levels higher than reported for most other ecosystems. Resprouting species were well represented in both the SSB and CSB, and there was no evidence for lower seed production in resprouters than in non-sprouters overall. The SSB and CSB held no species in common and were characterized by markedly different seed dispersal attributes, with winged or small seeds in the CSB and seeds dispersed by ants, birds, and wind (though none with wings) in the SSB. There was no evidence of spatial differentiation in the distribution of seeds of SSB species between vegetated and open microsites that might facilitate species coexistence, but most woody non-sprouters showed aggregation at scales of 1-2 m, implying limited seed dispersal. High similarity between overall seed bank (SSB+CSB) and extant species composition, high number of resprouting species, and seed dispersal processes before (SSB) and after fire (CSB) leading to differential spatial aggregation of post-fire recruits from the two seed bank types may buffer species composition against rapid change and provide a mechanism for maintaining species coexistence at the local scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2292-2304
Number of pages13
JournalEcology
Volume88
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

seed storage
seed bank
shrubland
buried seeds
Spermatophytina
shrublands
coexistence
canopy
seed
soil
species diversity
seed dispersal
seeds
plant species
resprouting
seed crop production
species richness
seed production
nutrient availability
serotiny

Keywords

  • Canopy seed bank
  • Coexistence
  • Fire
  • Serotiny
  • Shrublands
  • Soil seed bank
  • Southwestern Australia
  • Species richness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands. / Enright, N. J.; Mosner, E.; Miller, B. P.; Johnson, Nancy; Lamont, Byron B.

In: Ecology, Vol. 88, No. 9, 09.2007, p. 2292-2304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enright, N. J. ; Mosner, E. ; Miller, B. P. ; Johnson, Nancy ; Lamont, Byron B. / Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands. In: Ecology. 2007 ; Vol. 88, No. 9. pp. 2292-2304.
@article{2f2c67c4af1b45e9b40f041134a5d7b6,
title = "Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands",
abstract = "The fire-prone shrublands of southwestern Australia are renowned for their high plant species diversity and prominence of canopy seed storage (serotiny). We compared species richness, abundance, and life history attributes for soil and canopy seed banks in relation to extant vegetation among four sites with different substrate conditions and high species turnover (50-80{\%}) to identify whether this unusual community-level organization of seed storage might contribute to maintenance of high species richness. Soil seed bank (SSB) densities were low to moderate (233-1435 seeds/m2) compared with densities for other Mediterranean-type vegetation and were lowest for sites with highest canopy seed bank (CSB) species richness and lowest nutrient availability, but not richness or abundance of resprouters. Annuals were infrequent in the lowest nutrient sites, but there was no evidence that small SSB size was due to low seed inputs or a trade-off between seed production/storage and seed size in response to low nutrient availability. Sorensen's similarity between SSB and extant vegetation was 26-43{\%} but increased to 54-57{\%} when the CSB was included, representing levels higher than reported for most other ecosystems. Resprouting species were well represented in both the SSB and CSB, and there was no evidence for lower seed production in resprouters than in non-sprouters overall. The SSB and CSB held no species in common and were characterized by markedly different seed dispersal attributes, with winged or small seeds in the CSB and seeds dispersed by ants, birds, and wind (though none with wings) in the SSB. There was no evidence of spatial differentiation in the distribution of seeds of SSB species between vegetated and open microsites that might facilitate species coexistence, but most woody non-sprouters showed aggregation at scales of 1-2 m, implying limited seed dispersal. High similarity between overall seed bank (SSB+CSB) and extant species composition, high number of resprouting species, and seed dispersal processes before (SSB) and after fire (CSB) leading to differential spatial aggregation of post-fire recruits from the two seed bank types may buffer species composition against rapid change and provide a mechanism for maintaining species coexistence at the local scale.",
keywords = "Canopy seed bank, Coexistence, Fire, Serotiny, Shrublands, Soil seed bank, Southwestern Australia, Species richness",
author = "Enright, {N. J.} and E. Mosner and Miller, {B. P.} and Nancy Johnson and Lamont, {Byron B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1890/06-1343.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "2292--2304",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands

AU - Enright, N. J.

AU - Mosner, E.

AU - Miller, B. P.

AU - Johnson, Nancy

AU - Lamont, Byron B.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The fire-prone shrublands of southwestern Australia are renowned for their high plant species diversity and prominence of canopy seed storage (serotiny). We compared species richness, abundance, and life history attributes for soil and canopy seed banks in relation to extant vegetation among four sites with different substrate conditions and high species turnover (50-80%) to identify whether this unusual community-level organization of seed storage might contribute to maintenance of high species richness. Soil seed bank (SSB) densities were low to moderate (233-1435 seeds/m2) compared with densities for other Mediterranean-type vegetation and were lowest for sites with highest canopy seed bank (CSB) species richness and lowest nutrient availability, but not richness or abundance of resprouters. Annuals were infrequent in the lowest nutrient sites, but there was no evidence that small SSB size was due to low seed inputs or a trade-off between seed production/storage and seed size in response to low nutrient availability. Sorensen's similarity between SSB and extant vegetation was 26-43% but increased to 54-57% when the CSB was included, representing levels higher than reported for most other ecosystems. Resprouting species were well represented in both the SSB and CSB, and there was no evidence for lower seed production in resprouters than in non-sprouters overall. The SSB and CSB held no species in common and were characterized by markedly different seed dispersal attributes, with winged or small seeds in the CSB and seeds dispersed by ants, birds, and wind (though none with wings) in the SSB. There was no evidence of spatial differentiation in the distribution of seeds of SSB species between vegetated and open microsites that might facilitate species coexistence, but most woody non-sprouters showed aggregation at scales of 1-2 m, implying limited seed dispersal. High similarity between overall seed bank (SSB+CSB) and extant species composition, high number of resprouting species, and seed dispersal processes before (SSB) and after fire (CSB) leading to differential spatial aggregation of post-fire recruits from the two seed bank types may buffer species composition against rapid change and provide a mechanism for maintaining species coexistence at the local scale.

AB - The fire-prone shrublands of southwestern Australia are renowned for their high plant species diversity and prominence of canopy seed storage (serotiny). We compared species richness, abundance, and life history attributes for soil and canopy seed banks in relation to extant vegetation among four sites with different substrate conditions and high species turnover (50-80%) to identify whether this unusual community-level organization of seed storage might contribute to maintenance of high species richness. Soil seed bank (SSB) densities were low to moderate (233-1435 seeds/m2) compared with densities for other Mediterranean-type vegetation and were lowest for sites with highest canopy seed bank (CSB) species richness and lowest nutrient availability, but not richness or abundance of resprouters. Annuals were infrequent in the lowest nutrient sites, but there was no evidence that small SSB size was due to low seed inputs or a trade-off between seed production/storage and seed size in response to low nutrient availability. Sorensen's similarity between SSB and extant vegetation was 26-43% but increased to 54-57% when the CSB was included, representing levels higher than reported for most other ecosystems. Resprouting species were well represented in both the SSB and CSB, and there was no evidence for lower seed production in resprouters than in non-sprouters overall. The SSB and CSB held no species in common and were characterized by markedly different seed dispersal attributes, with winged or small seeds in the CSB and seeds dispersed by ants, birds, and wind (though none with wings) in the SSB. There was no evidence of spatial differentiation in the distribution of seeds of SSB species between vegetated and open microsites that might facilitate species coexistence, but most woody non-sprouters showed aggregation at scales of 1-2 m, implying limited seed dispersal. High similarity between overall seed bank (SSB+CSB) and extant species composition, high number of resprouting species, and seed dispersal processes before (SSB) and after fire (CSB) leading to differential spatial aggregation of post-fire recruits from the two seed bank types may buffer species composition against rapid change and provide a mechanism for maintaining species coexistence at the local scale.

KW - Canopy seed bank

KW - Coexistence

KW - Fire

KW - Serotiny

KW - Shrublands

KW - Soil seed bank

KW - Southwestern Australia

KW - Species richness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38449123160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38449123160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/06-1343.1

DO - 10.1890/06-1343.1

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 2292

EP - 2304

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 9

ER -