Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques

S. S. Jarvis, B. D. Levine, G. K. Prisk, B. E. Shykoff, A. R. Elliott, E. Rosow, C. G. Blomqvist, J. A. Pawelczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foreign and soluble gas rebreathing methods are attractive for determining cardiac output (Q̇c) because they incur less risk than traditional invasive methods such as direct Fick and thermodilution. We compared simultaneously obtained Q̇c measurements during rest and exercise to assess the accuracy and precision of several rebreathing methods. Q̇c measurements were obtained during rest (supine and standing) and stationary cycling (submaximal and maximal) in 13 men and 1 woman (age: 24 ± 7 yr; height: 178 ± 5 cm; weight: 78 ± 13 kg; V̇O2max: 45.1 ± 9.4 ml·kg -1·min-1; mean ± SD) using one-N 2O, four-C2H2, one-CO2 (single-step) rebreathing technique, and two criterion methods (direct Fick and thermodilution). CO2 rebreathing overestimated Q̇c compared with the criterion methods (supine: 8.1 ± 2.0 vs. 6.4 ± 1.6 and 7.2 ± 1.2 l/min, respectively; maximal exercise: 27.0 ± 6.0 vs. 24.0 ± 3.9 and 23.3 ± 3.8 l/min). C2H 2 and N2O rebreathing techniques tended to underestimate Q̇c (range: 6.6-7.3 l/min for supine rest; range: 16.0-19.1 l/min for maximal exercise). Bartlett's test indicated variance heterogeneity among the methods (P < 0.05), where CO2 rebreathing consistently demonstrated larger variance. At rest, most means from the noninvasive techniques were ±10% of direct Fick and thermodilution. During exercise, all methods fell outside the ±10% range, except for CO2 rebreathing. Thus the CO2 rebreathing method was accurate over a wider range (rest through maximal exercise), but was less precise. We conclude that foreign gas rebreathing can provide reasonable Q̇c estimates with fewer repeat trials during resting conditions. During exercise, these methods remain precise but tend to underestimate Q̇c. Single-step CO2 rebreathing may be successfully employed over a wider range but with more measurements needed to overcome the larger variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)867-874
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiac Output
Exercise
Thermodilution
Gases
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Direct Fick
  • Foreign gas rebreathing
  • Physiological gas rebreathing
  • Thermodilution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Endocrinology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques. / Jarvis, S. S.; Levine, B. D.; Prisk, G. K.; Shykoff, B. E.; Elliott, A. R.; Rosow, E.; Blomqvist, C. G.; Pawelczyk, J. A.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 103, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 867-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jarvis, SS, Levine, BD, Prisk, GK, Shykoff, BE, Elliott, AR, Rosow, E, Blomqvist, CG & Pawelczyk, JA 2007, 'Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques', Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 867-874. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2006
Jarvis, S. S. ; Levine, B. D. ; Prisk, G. K. ; Shykoff, B. E. ; Elliott, A. R. ; Rosow, E. ; Blomqvist, C. G. ; Pawelczyk, J. A. / Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 867-874.
@article{cf1934213b6647528c62f83cb0fd9787,
title = "Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques",
abstract = "Foreign and soluble gas rebreathing methods are attractive for determining cardiac output (Q̇c) because they incur less risk than traditional invasive methods such as direct Fick and thermodilution. We compared simultaneously obtained Q̇c measurements during rest and exercise to assess the accuracy and precision of several rebreathing methods. Q̇c measurements were obtained during rest (supine and standing) and stationary cycling (submaximal and maximal) in 13 men and 1 woman (age: 24 ± 7 yr; height: 178 ± 5 cm; weight: 78 ± 13 kg; V̇O2max: 45.1 ± 9.4 ml·kg -1·min-1; mean ± SD) using one-N 2O, four-C2H2, one-CO2 (single-step) rebreathing technique, and two criterion methods (direct Fick and thermodilution). CO2 rebreathing overestimated Q̇c compared with the criterion methods (supine: 8.1 ± 2.0 vs. 6.4 ± 1.6 and 7.2 ± 1.2 l/min, respectively; maximal exercise: 27.0 ± 6.0 vs. 24.0 ± 3.9 and 23.3 ± 3.8 l/min). C2H 2 and N2O rebreathing techniques tended to underestimate Q̇c (range: 6.6-7.3 l/min for supine rest; range: 16.0-19.1 l/min for maximal exercise). Bartlett's test indicated variance heterogeneity among the methods (P < 0.05), where CO2 rebreathing consistently demonstrated larger variance. At rest, most means from the noninvasive techniques were ±10{\%} of direct Fick and thermodilution. During exercise, all methods fell outside the ±10{\%} range, except for CO2 rebreathing. Thus the CO2 rebreathing method was accurate over a wider range (rest through maximal exercise), but was less precise. We conclude that foreign gas rebreathing can provide reasonable Q̇c estimates with fewer repeat trials during resting conditions. During exercise, these methods remain precise but tend to underestimate Q̇c. Single-step CO2 rebreathing may be successfully employed over a wider range but with more measurements needed to overcome the larger variability.",
keywords = "Direct Fick, Foreign gas rebreathing, Physiological gas rebreathing, Thermodilution",
author = "Jarvis, {S. S.} and Levine, {B. D.} and Prisk, {G. K.} and Shykoff, {B. E.} and Elliott, {A. R.} and E. Rosow and Blomqvist, {C. G.} and Pawelczyk, {J. A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "867--874",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques

AU - Jarvis, S. S.

AU - Levine, B. D.

AU - Prisk, G. K.

AU - Shykoff, B. E.

AU - Elliott, A. R.

AU - Rosow, E.

AU - Blomqvist, C. G.

AU - Pawelczyk, J. A.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Foreign and soluble gas rebreathing methods are attractive for determining cardiac output (Q̇c) because they incur less risk than traditional invasive methods such as direct Fick and thermodilution. We compared simultaneously obtained Q̇c measurements during rest and exercise to assess the accuracy and precision of several rebreathing methods. Q̇c measurements were obtained during rest (supine and standing) and stationary cycling (submaximal and maximal) in 13 men and 1 woman (age: 24 ± 7 yr; height: 178 ± 5 cm; weight: 78 ± 13 kg; V̇O2max: 45.1 ± 9.4 ml·kg -1·min-1; mean ± SD) using one-N 2O, four-C2H2, one-CO2 (single-step) rebreathing technique, and two criterion methods (direct Fick and thermodilution). CO2 rebreathing overestimated Q̇c compared with the criterion methods (supine: 8.1 ± 2.0 vs. 6.4 ± 1.6 and 7.2 ± 1.2 l/min, respectively; maximal exercise: 27.0 ± 6.0 vs. 24.0 ± 3.9 and 23.3 ± 3.8 l/min). C2H 2 and N2O rebreathing techniques tended to underestimate Q̇c (range: 6.6-7.3 l/min for supine rest; range: 16.0-19.1 l/min for maximal exercise). Bartlett's test indicated variance heterogeneity among the methods (P < 0.05), where CO2 rebreathing consistently demonstrated larger variance. At rest, most means from the noninvasive techniques were ±10% of direct Fick and thermodilution. During exercise, all methods fell outside the ±10% range, except for CO2 rebreathing. Thus the CO2 rebreathing method was accurate over a wider range (rest through maximal exercise), but was less precise. We conclude that foreign gas rebreathing can provide reasonable Q̇c estimates with fewer repeat trials during resting conditions. During exercise, these methods remain precise but tend to underestimate Q̇c. Single-step CO2 rebreathing may be successfully employed over a wider range but with more measurements needed to overcome the larger variability.

AB - Foreign and soluble gas rebreathing methods are attractive for determining cardiac output (Q̇c) because they incur less risk than traditional invasive methods such as direct Fick and thermodilution. We compared simultaneously obtained Q̇c measurements during rest and exercise to assess the accuracy and precision of several rebreathing methods. Q̇c measurements were obtained during rest (supine and standing) and stationary cycling (submaximal and maximal) in 13 men and 1 woman (age: 24 ± 7 yr; height: 178 ± 5 cm; weight: 78 ± 13 kg; V̇O2max: 45.1 ± 9.4 ml·kg -1·min-1; mean ± SD) using one-N 2O, four-C2H2, one-CO2 (single-step) rebreathing technique, and two criterion methods (direct Fick and thermodilution). CO2 rebreathing overestimated Q̇c compared with the criterion methods (supine: 8.1 ± 2.0 vs. 6.4 ± 1.6 and 7.2 ± 1.2 l/min, respectively; maximal exercise: 27.0 ± 6.0 vs. 24.0 ± 3.9 and 23.3 ± 3.8 l/min). C2H 2 and N2O rebreathing techniques tended to underestimate Q̇c (range: 6.6-7.3 l/min for supine rest; range: 16.0-19.1 l/min for maximal exercise). Bartlett's test indicated variance heterogeneity among the methods (P < 0.05), where CO2 rebreathing consistently demonstrated larger variance. At rest, most means from the noninvasive techniques were ±10% of direct Fick and thermodilution. During exercise, all methods fell outside the ±10% range, except for CO2 rebreathing. Thus the CO2 rebreathing method was accurate over a wider range (rest through maximal exercise), but was less precise. We conclude that foreign gas rebreathing can provide reasonable Q̇c estimates with fewer repeat trials during resting conditions. During exercise, these methods remain precise but tend to underestimate Q̇c. Single-step CO2 rebreathing may be successfully employed over a wider range but with more measurements needed to overcome the larger variability.

KW - Direct Fick

KW - Foreign gas rebreathing

KW - Physiological gas rebreathing

KW - Thermodilution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548458489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548458489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2006

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2006

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 867

EP - 874

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 3

ER -