Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?

Douglas E Biber, Bethany Gray, Kornwipa Poonpon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of L2 writing development usually measure T-units and clausal subordination to assess grammatical complexity, assuming that increased subordination is typical of advanced writing. In this article we challenge this practice by showing that these measures are much more characteristic of conversation than academic writing. The article begins with a critical evaluation of T-units and clausal subordination as measures of writing development, arguing that they have not proven to be effective discriminators of language proficiency differences. These shortcomings lead to the question of whether these measures actually capture the complexities of professional academic writing, and if not, what alternative measures are better suited? Corpus-based analyses are undertaken to answer these questions, investigating 28 grammatical features in research articles contrasted with conversation. The results are surprising, showing that most clausal subordination measures are actually more common in conversation than academic writing. In contrast, fundamentally different kinds of grammatical complexity are common in academic writing: complex noun phrase constituents (rather than clause constituents) and complex phrases (rather than clauses). Based on these findings, we hypothesize a sequence of developmental stages for student writing, proposing a radically new approach for the study of complexity in student writing development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-35
Number of pages31
JournalTESOL Quarterly
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

conversation
Academic Writing
L2 Writing
Subordination
Writing Development
Constituent
student
Student Writing
T-units
language
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? / Biber, Douglas E; Gray, Bethany; Poonpon, Kornwipa.

In: TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 5-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{968c80b6b21548cd9c5f6d0dcc6dc2f8,
title = "Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?",
abstract = "Studies of L2 writing development usually measure T-units and clausal subordination to assess grammatical complexity, assuming that increased subordination is typical of advanced writing. In this article we challenge this practice by showing that these measures are much more characteristic of conversation than academic writing. The article begins with a critical evaluation of T-units and clausal subordination as measures of writing development, arguing that they have not proven to be effective discriminators of language proficiency differences. These shortcomings lead to the question of whether these measures actually capture the complexities of professional academic writing, and if not, what alternative measures are better suited? Corpus-based analyses are undertaken to answer these questions, investigating 28 grammatical features in research articles contrasted with conversation. The results are surprising, showing that most clausal subordination measures are actually more common in conversation than academic writing. In contrast, fundamentally different kinds of grammatical complexity are common in academic writing: complex noun phrase constituents (rather than clause constituents) and complex phrases (rather than clauses). Based on these findings, we hypothesize a sequence of developmental stages for student writing, proposing a radically new approach for the study of complexity in student writing development.",
author = "Biber, {Douglas E} and Bethany Gray and Kornwipa Poonpon",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.5054/tq.2011.244483",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "5--35",
journal = "TESOL Quarterly",
issn = "0039-8322",
publisher = "TESOL",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?

AU - Biber, Douglas E

AU - Gray, Bethany

AU - Poonpon, Kornwipa

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Studies of L2 writing development usually measure T-units and clausal subordination to assess grammatical complexity, assuming that increased subordination is typical of advanced writing. In this article we challenge this practice by showing that these measures are much more characteristic of conversation than academic writing. The article begins with a critical evaluation of T-units and clausal subordination as measures of writing development, arguing that they have not proven to be effective discriminators of language proficiency differences. These shortcomings lead to the question of whether these measures actually capture the complexities of professional academic writing, and if not, what alternative measures are better suited? Corpus-based analyses are undertaken to answer these questions, investigating 28 grammatical features in research articles contrasted with conversation. The results are surprising, showing that most clausal subordination measures are actually more common in conversation than academic writing. In contrast, fundamentally different kinds of grammatical complexity are common in academic writing: complex noun phrase constituents (rather than clause constituents) and complex phrases (rather than clauses). Based on these findings, we hypothesize a sequence of developmental stages for student writing, proposing a radically new approach for the study of complexity in student writing development.

AB - Studies of L2 writing development usually measure T-units and clausal subordination to assess grammatical complexity, assuming that increased subordination is typical of advanced writing. In this article we challenge this practice by showing that these measures are much more characteristic of conversation than academic writing. The article begins with a critical evaluation of T-units and clausal subordination as measures of writing development, arguing that they have not proven to be effective discriminators of language proficiency differences. These shortcomings lead to the question of whether these measures actually capture the complexities of professional academic writing, and if not, what alternative measures are better suited? Corpus-based analyses are undertaken to answer these questions, investigating 28 grammatical features in research articles contrasted with conversation. The results are surprising, showing that most clausal subordination measures are actually more common in conversation than academic writing. In contrast, fundamentally different kinds of grammatical complexity are common in academic writing: complex noun phrase constituents (rather than clause constituents) and complex phrases (rather than clauses). Based on these findings, we hypothesize a sequence of developmental stages for student writing, proposing a radically new approach for the study of complexity in student writing development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952771104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952771104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5054/tq.2011.244483

DO - 10.5054/tq.2011.244483

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952771104

VL - 45

SP - 5

EP - 35

JO - TESOL Quarterly

JF - TESOL Quarterly

SN - 0039-8322

IS - 1

ER -