Sequential power analysis framework in assessing social forestry outcomes

Muhammad Alif K. Sahide, Micah R. Fisher, Bart Verheijen, Ahmad Maryudi, Yeon Su Kim, Grace Y. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We extend the Actor-Centred Power framework to consider dimensions beyond the life of community natural resource management partnership initiatives by examining social forestry partnership projects in Indonesia. We do this by examining how power constellations realign across the temporal phases that operationalize project partnerships. We propose a sequential power analysis framework that examines power in three parts. The framework first proposes a method for historicizing actors into their power background. Second, we present mode for examining the arrival of a partnership scheme, which we call the power delivery phase. Third, we highlight approaches for examining the way power relations are adjusted, whether reinforced or reconfigured, by introducing an approach for examining programmatic outcomes of social forestry partnership schemes. This article thus provides broadly applicable but targeted guide for the researchers collecting data and seeking to make sense of power relations on community forest partnership schemes in various contexts. This framework is particularly useful for analysing equity and justice dimensions by highlighting who benefits and who loses. • Sequential Power Analysis (SPA) methodology is rooted in interest based and historical power framework. • SPA is consisted of three parts: power background, power delivery, and power adjustment • SPA framing provides a protocol for researchers to collect data

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100917
StatePublished - 2020


  • Power adjustment
  • Power background
  • Power delivery
  • Sequential power analysis
  • Sequential power analysis (SPA)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Medical Laboratory Technology


Dive into the research topics of 'Sequential power analysis framework in assessing social forestry outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this