Science, planning, and the logic of suburban sprawl

Dustin R. Hiles, Janine Schipper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines how planners have helped buttress the rational society and shaped the logic of suburban development in the U.S. In attempts to maintain an expert class and pursue “progress” through scientific management, planning inadvertently helps sustain the suburban sprawl that characterizes development in post-WWII America. We explore how the planning industry’s efforts to reform housing development gets undermined through use of an elitist professional discourse, cooption by capitalist developers and real estate interests, and a lack of dedication to democracy and public inclusion. We also examine how Critical Planning Theory seeks to challenge the dominant rationalized model. Finally, considering the challenges that the planning industry continues to face, we ask what it would take to recast planning as a serious reform effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-762
Number of pages22
JournalSociological Spectrum
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

planning
science
planning theory
reform
management planning
housing development
critical theory
real estate
inclusion
expert
democracy
industry
discourse
lack
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Science, planning, and the logic of suburban sprawl. / Hiles, Dustin R.; Schipper, Janine.

In: Sociological Spectrum, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.01.2008, p. 741-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hiles, Dustin R. ; Schipper, Janine. / Science, planning, and the logic of suburban sprawl. In: Sociological Spectrum. 2008 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 741-762.
@article{e395ce531f5a4e20b61503dff365b82b,
title = "Science, planning, and the logic of suburban sprawl",
abstract = "This article examines how planners have helped buttress the rational society and shaped the logic of suburban development in the U.S. In attempts to maintain an expert class and pursue “progress” through scientific management, planning inadvertently helps sustain the suburban sprawl that characterizes development in post-WWII America. We explore how the planning industry’s efforts to reform housing development gets undermined through use of an elitist professional discourse, cooption by capitalist developers and real estate interests, and a lack of dedication to democracy and public inclusion. We also examine how Critical Planning Theory seeks to challenge the dominant rationalized model. Finally, considering the challenges that the planning industry continues to face, we ask what it would take to recast planning as a serious reform effort.",
author = "Hiles, {Dustin R.} and Janine Schipper",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02732170802342990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "741--762",
journal = "Sociological Spectrum",
issn = "0273-2173",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science, planning, and the logic of suburban sprawl

AU - Hiles, Dustin R.

AU - Schipper, Janine

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This article examines how planners have helped buttress the rational society and shaped the logic of suburban development in the U.S. In attempts to maintain an expert class and pursue “progress” through scientific management, planning inadvertently helps sustain the suburban sprawl that characterizes development in post-WWII America. We explore how the planning industry’s efforts to reform housing development gets undermined through use of an elitist professional discourse, cooption by capitalist developers and real estate interests, and a lack of dedication to democracy and public inclusion. We also examine how Critical Planning Theory seeks to challenge the dominant rationalized model. Finally, considering the challenges that the planning industry continues to face, we ask what it would take to recast planning as a serious reform effort.

AB - This article examines how planners have helped buttress the rational society and shaped the logic of suburban development in the U.S. In attempts to maintain an expert class and pursue “progress” through scientific management, planning inadvertently helps sustain the suburban sprawl that characterizes development in post-WWII America. We explore how the planning industry’s efforts to reform housing development gets undermined through use of an elitist professional discourse, cooption by capitalist developers and real estate interests, and a lack of dedication to democracy and public inclusion. We also examine how Critical Planning Theory seeks to challenge the dominant rationalized model. Finally, considering the challenges that the planning industry continues to face, we ask what it would take to recast planning as a serious reform effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69849122204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69849122204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02732170802342990

DO - 10.1080/02732170802342990

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 741

EP - 762

JO - Sociological Spectrum

JF - Sociological Spectrum

SN - 0273-2173

IS - 6

ER -