Sample preparation and digestion considerations for determining metal deposition at small arms ranges

Jay L. Clausen, James Kaste, Michael E Ketterer, Nic Korte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Determining the metal content of soil collected from small arms training ranges (SARs) is difficult and controversial because the contamination consists of fine particulates abraded from bullets and larger fragments such as intact bullets and spent shell casings. This heterogeneous distribution of materials can be difficult to sample reproducibly and difficult to prepare for analysis. Similar issues are encountered with sampling and analysing solid residues of energetic compounds for which grinding to 75 microns is necessary to achieve excellent precision. Issues to be resolved for SAR metals include the necessity of sieving, the extent of contamination from grinding, and the proper digestion procedure for efficient recovery. The work reported in this manuscript employed field and laboratory sampling approaches developed for energetics and examined a variety of laboratory sample preparation techniques for SAR metals. Application of the sampling approaches used for energetics to metals was straightforward. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) nitric acid digestion procedure is effective for the recovery of three of the most important SAR metals, copper, lead and zinc, when analysing a 2 g portion of the <2mm fraction of an unground soil sample. However, sieving the sample ignores a large portion of the total metal load and a total digestion with hydrofluoric acid is necessary to determine the concentration of all naturally-occurring metals in the sample. Finally, the USEPA-approved method for metal analysis is inappropriate for tungsten unless supplemented with phosphoric acid.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)903-921
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

sample preparation
digestion
Digestion
Metals
metals
metal
sampling
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Sampling
energetics
sieving
grinding
Contamination
Metal analysis
Soil
Hydrofluoric Acid
Soils
Nitric Acid
hydrofluoric acid

Keywords

  • Copper
  • Lead
  • Sample preparation
  • Soil contamination
  • Tungsten

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Sample preparation and digestion considerations for determining metal deposition at small arms ranges. / Clausen, Jay L.; Kaste, James; Ketterer, Michael E; Korte, Nic.

In: International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 90, No. 12, 2010, p. 903-921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{134d5997958a417d8c68cb446facce5d,
title = "Sample preparation and digestion considerations for determining metal deposition at small arms ranges",
abstract = "Determining the metal content of soil collected from small arms training ranges (SARs) is difficult and controversial because the contamination consists of fine particulates abraded from bullets and larger fragments such as intact bullets and spent shell casings. This heterogeneous distribution of materials can be difficult to sample reproducibly and difficult to prepare for analysis. Similar issues are encountered with sampling and analysing solid residues of energetic compounds for which grinding to 75 microns is necessary to achieve excellent precision. Issues to be resolved for SAR metals include the necessity of sieving, the extent of contamination from grinding, and the proper digestion procedure for efficient recovery. The work reported in this manuscript employed field and laboratory sampling approaches developed for energetics and examined a variety of laboratory sample preparation techniques for SAR metals. Application of the sampling approaches used for energetics to metals was straightforward. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) nitric acid digestion procedure is effective for the recovery of three of the most important SAR metals, copper, lead and zinc, when analysing a 2 g portion of the <2mm fraction of an unground soil sample. However, sieving the sample ignores a large portion of the total metal load and a total digestion with hydrofluoric acid is necessary to determine the concentration of all naturally-occurring metals in the sample. Finally, the USEPA-approved method for metal analysis is inappropriate for tungsten unless supplemented with phosphoric acid.",
keywords = "Copper, Lead, Sample preparation, Soil contamination, Tungsten",
author = "Clausen, {Jay L.} and James Kaste and Ketterer, {Michael E} and Nic Korte",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/03067310903353495",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "903--921",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry",
issn = "0306-7319",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sample preparation and digestion considerations for determining metal deposition at small arms ranges

AU - Clausen, Jay L.

AU - Kaste, James

AU - Ketterer, Michael E

AU - Korte, Nic

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Determining the metal content of soil collected from small arms training ranges (SARs) is difficult and controversial because the contamination consists of fine particulates abraded from bullets and larger fragments such as intact bullets and spent shell casings. This heterogeneous distribution of materials can be difficult to sample reproducibly and difficult to prepare for analysis. Similar issues are encountered with sampling and analysing solid residues of energetic compounds for which grinding to 75 microns is necessary to achieve excellent precision. Issues to be resolved for SAR metals include the necessity of sieving, the extent of contamination from grinding, and the proper digestion procedure for efficient recovery. The work reported in this manuscript employed field and laboratory sampling approaches developed for energetics and examined a variety of laboratory sample preparation techniques for SAR metals. Application of the sampling approaches used for energetics to metals was straightforward. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) nitric acid digestion procedure is effective for the recovery of three of the most important SAR metals, copper, lead and zinc, when analysing a 2 g portion of the <2mm fraction of an unground soil sample. However, sieving the sample ignores a large portion of the total metal load and a total digestion with hydrofluoric acid is necessary to determine the concentration of all naturally-occurring metals in the sample. Finally, the USEPA-approved method for metal analysis is inappropriate for tungsten unless supplemented with phosphoric acid.

AB - Determining the metal content of soil collected from small arms training ranges (SARs) is difficult and controversial because the contamination consists of fine particulates abraded from bullets and larger fragments such as intact bullets and spent shell casings. This heterogeneous distribution of materials can be difficult to sample reproducibly and difficult to prepare for analysis. Similar issues are encountered with sampling and analysing solid residues of energetic compounds for which grinding to 75 microns is necessary to achieve excellent precision. Issues to be resolved for SAR metals include the necessity of sieving, the extent of contamination from grinding, and the proper digestion procedure for efficient recovery. The work reported in this manuscript employed field and laboratory sampling approaches developed for energetics and examined a variety of laboratory sample preparation techniques for SAR metals. Application of the sampling approaches used for energetics to metals was straightforward. The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) nitric acid digestion procedure is effective for the recovery of three of the most important SAR metals, copper, lead and zinc, when analysing a 2 g portion of the <2mm fraction of an unground soil sample. However, sieving the sample ignores a large portion of the total metal load and a total digestion with hydrofluoric acid is necessary to determine the concentration of all naturally-occurring metals in the sample. Finally, the USEPA-approved method for metal analysis is inappropriate for tungsten unless supplemented with phosphoric acid.

KW - Copper

KW - Lead

KW - Sample preparation

KW - Soil contamination

KW - Tungsten

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956087973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956087973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03067310903353495

DO - 10.1080/03067310903353495

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 903

EP - 921

JO - International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

JF - International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

SN - 0306-7319

IS - 12

ER -