Safety of strength training in premenopausal women: Musculoskeletal injuries from a two-year randomized trial

Meghan Warren, Kathryn H. Schmitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The health benefits of strength training must be weighed against risks, including injuries. A prior study observed 4.2 injuries that limited usual activities for a day per 1000 strength training sessions among men and women. The analysis herein explores the incidence rates of musculoskeletal injuries from strength training in women. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Free-living community. Subjects. A total of 163 injury-free, overweight, sedentary, premenopausal women aged 25 to 44 years. Intervention. Two years of strength training (n = 81) or standard care (n = 82). The intervention followed published guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) with hypothesized injury prevention strategies. Measures. An injury survey was administered at years 1 and 2. Injury was defined as physical activity or strength training associated injuries that limited daily activities for 1 week or more. Denominators for rate calculation were accelerometer- measured physical activity and strength training attendance (strength training only). The between-group probability of injuries was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results. Injury incidence rates were higher in strength training compared with standard care. In strength training, the injury rates were 3.6 per 1000 strength training sessions (95% confidence interval: 2.5-4.8 per 1000) for physical activity-related injuries, and 2.6 per 1000 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.6 per 1000) for strength training-related injuries. Conclusions. Injury rates varied by definition and denominator. Strength training had lower injury rates than previously reported, providing preliminary support for the prevention strategies. The finding of strength training injuries underscores the need for balancing the benefits against the potential risks of this exercise modality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-314
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Safety
Wounds and Injuries
Exercise
incidence
confidence
Confidence Intervals
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
health
Incidence
Insurance Benefits

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Health focus: Fitness/physical activity
  • Injury
  • Manuscript format: Research
  • Muscle strength
  • Outcome measure: Behavioral and biometric
  • Prevention research
  • Research purpose: Intervention testing
  • Safety
  • Setting: Community
  • Strategy: Skill building/behavior change
  • Study design: Randomized trial
  • Target population age: Adults
  • Target population characteristics: Gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Safety of strength training in premenopausal women : Musculoskeletal injuries from a two-year randomized trial. / Warren, Meghan; Schmitz, Kathryn H.

In: American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 23, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 309-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a8518660cd59493a8fa532b0ccf763f8,
title = "Safety of strength training in premenopausal women: Musculoskeletal injuries from a two-year randomized trial",
abstract = "Purpose. The health benefits of strength training must be weighed against risks, including injuries. A prior study observed 4.2 injuries that limited usual activities for a day per 1000 strength training sessions among men and women. The analysis herein explores the incidence rates of musculoskeletal injuries from strength training in women. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Free-living community. Subjects. A total of 163 injury-free, overweight, sedentary, premenopausal women aged 25 to 44 years. Intervention. Two years of strength training (n = 81) or standard care (n = 82). The intervention followed published guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) with hypothesized injury prevention strategies. Measures. An injury survey was administered at years 1 and 2. Injury was defined as physical activity or strength training associated injuries that limited daily activities for 1 week or more. Denominators for rate calculation were accelerometer- measured physical activity and strength training attendance (strength training only). The between-group probability of injuries was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results. Injury incidence rates were higher in strength training compared with standard care. In strength training, the injury rates were 3.6 per 1000 strength training sessions (95{\%} confidence interval: 2.5-4.8 per 1000) for physical activity-related injuries, and 2.6 per 1000 (95{\%} confidence interval: 1.5-3.6 per 1000) for strength training-related injuries. Conclusions. Injury rates varied by definition and denominator. Strength training had lower injury rates than previously reported, providing preliminary support for the prevention strategies. The finding of strength training injuries underscores the need for balancing the benefits against the potential risks of this exercise modality.",
keywords = "Exercise, Health focus: Fitness/physical activity, Injury, Manuscript format: Research, Muscle strength, Outcome measure: Behavioral and biometric, Prevention research, Research purpose: Intervention testing, Safety, Setting: Community, Strategy: Skill building/behavior change, Study design: Randomized trial, Target population age: Adults, Target population characteristics: Gender",
author = "Meghan Warren and Schmitz, {Kathryn H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.4278/ajhp.07081584",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "309--314",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety of strength training in premenopausal women

T2 - Musculoskeletal injuries from a two-year randomized trial

AU - Warren, Meghan

AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Purpose. The health benefits of strength training must be weighed against risks, including injuries. A prior study observed 4.2 injuries that limited usual activities for a day per 1000 strength training sessions among men and women. The analysis herein explores the incidence rates of musculoskeletal injuries from strength training in women. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Free-living community. Subjects. A total of 163 injury-free, overweight, sedentary, premenopausal women aged 25 to 44 years. Intervention. Two years of strength training (n = 81) or standard care (n = 82). The intervention followed published guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) with hypothesized injury prevention strategies. Measures. An injury survey was administered at years 1 and 2. Injury was defined as physical activity or strength training associated injuries that limited daily activities for 1 week or more. Denominators for rate calculation were accelerometer- measured physical activity and strength training attendance (strength training only). The between-group probability of injuries was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results. Injury incidence rates were higher in strength training compared with standard care. In strength training, the injury rates were 3.6 per 1000 strength training sessions (95% confidence interval: 2.5-4.8 per 1000) for physical activity-related injuries, and 2.6 per 1000 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.6 per 1000) for strength training-related injuries. Conclusions. Injury rates varied by definition and denominator. Strength training had lower injury rates than previously reported, providing preliminary support for the prevention strategies. The finding of strength training injuries underscores the need for balancing the benefits against the potential risks of this exercise modality.

AB - Purpose. The health benefits of strength training must be weighed against risks, including injuries. A prior study observed 4.2 injuries that limited usual activities for a day per 1000 strength training sessions among men and women. The analysis herein explores the incidence rates of musculoskeletal injuries from strength training in women. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Free-living community. Subjects. A total of 163 injury-free, overweight, sedentary, premenopausal women aged 25 to 44 years. Intervention. Two years of strength training (n = 81) or standard care (n = 82). The intervention followed published guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) with hypothesized injury prevention strategies. Measures. An injury survey was administered at years 1 and 2. Injury was defined as physical activity or strength training associated injuries that limited daily activities for 1 week or more. Denominators for rate calculation were accelerometer- measured physical activity and strength training attendance (strength training only). The between-group probability of injuries was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results. Injury incidence rates were higher in strength training compared with standard care. In strength training, the injury rates were 3.6 per 1000 strength training sessions (95% confidence interval: 2.5-4.8 per 1000) for physical activity-related injuries, and 2.6 per 1000 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.6 per 1000) for strength training-related injuries. Conclusions. Injury rates varied by definition and denominator. Strength training had lower injury rates than previously reported, providing preliminary support for the prevention strategies. The finding of strength training injuries underscores the need for balancing the benefits against the potential risks of this exercise modality.

KW - Exercise

KW - Health focus: Fitness/physical activity

KW - Injury

KW - Manuscript format: Research

KW - Muscle strength

KW - Outcome measure: Behavioral and biometric

KW - Prevention research

KW - Research purpose: Intervention testing

KW - Safety

KW - Setting: Community

KW - Strategy: Skill building/behavior change

KW - Study design: Randomized trial

KW - Target population age: Adults

KW - Target population characteristics: Gender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350736768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350736768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4278/ajhp.07081584

DO - 10.4278/ajhp.07081584

M3 - Article

C2 - 19445432

AN - SCOPUS:70350736768

VL - 23

SP - 309

EP - 314

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

IS - 5

ER -