Responsible knowledge workers: Rhetoric, media, and the third environment

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

We argue that successful participation and effective communication in online and offine communities is based on our knowledge of these communities, and on our interest in engaging in shared practices (Wenger, 1998). To better understand how we can prepare our students successfully for community participation in digital environments, geographically bound enviroments, and environments that merge the digital and the physical, we look at Javier Echeverria's work on telepolis and epistimopolis to show that any environment is constituted of communities that engage in shared practices. No space is ephemeral, but every space is part of a community that is joined into cities and into societies. We also borrow from the feld of business management, specifcally Peter F. (2006) who argues that the 21st century's knowledge society needs knowledge workers. To make sure that knowledge workers understand their roles in their communities, Drucker points out that we need to teach Aristotles principles of rhetoric to make sure that students understand the importance of purpose, intended audience, and speaker or author. Research that only requires an end product without constant analysis of purpose, audience, and writer in mind requires little knowledge (episteme) and focuses mostly on performance (techné). We also look to Drucker's (2006) work to help us think through strategies that can help students to become effective communicators. We provide student project examples as evidence for conscious attempts at participating in communities of practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society
Pages153-166
Number of pages14
Volume7
Edition2
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

rhetoric
Students
worker
community
student
business management
knowledge society
participation
communicator
Communication
writer
Industry
communication
society
performance
evidence

Keywords

  • Epistemopolis
  • Knowledge workers
  • Responsible citizens
  • Student projects
  • Third environment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Barron, N. G., & Gruber, S. (2011). Responsible knowledge workers: Rhetoric, media, and the third environment. In International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society (2 ed., Vol. 7, pp. 153-166)

Responsible knowledge workers : Rhetoric, media, and the third environment. / Barron, Nancy G; Gruber, Sibylle.

International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society. Vol. 7 2. ed. 2011. p. 153-166.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Barron, NG & Gruber, S 2011, Responsible knowledge workers: Rhetoric, media, and the third environment. in International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society. 2 edn, vol. 7, pp. 153-166.
Barron NG, Gruber S. Responsible knowledge workers: Rhetoric, media, and the third environment. In International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society. 2 ed. Vol. 7. 2011. p. 153-166
Barron, Nancy G ; Gruber, Sibylle. / Responsible knowledge workers : Rhetoric, media, and the third environment. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society. Vol. 7 2. ed. 2011. pp. 153-166
@inbook{4661df9ae83e4170b47bcd4525ffe607,
title = "Responsible knowledge workers: Rhetoric, media, and the third environment",
abstract = "We argue that successful participation and effective communication in online and offine communities is based on our knowledge of these communities, and on our interest in engaging in shared practices (Wenger, 1998). To better understand how we can prepare our students successfully for community participation in digital environments, geographically bound enviroments, and environments that merge the digital and the physical, we look at Javier Echeverria's work on telepolis and epistimopolis to show that any environment is constituted of communities that engage in shared practices. No space is ephemeral, but every space is part of a community that is joined into cities and into societies. We also borrow from the feld of business management, specifcally Peter F. (2006) who argues that the 21st century's knowledge society needs knowledge workers. To make sure that knowledge workers understand their roles in their communities, Drucker points out that we need to teach Aristotles principles of rhetoric to make sure that students understand the importance of purpose, intended audience, and speaker or author. Research that only requires an end product without constant analysis of purpose, audience, and writer in mind requires little knowledge (episteme) and focuses mostly on performance (techn{\'e}). We also look to Drucker's (2006) work to help us think through strategies that can help students to become effective communicators. We provide student project examples as evidence for conscious attempts at participating in communities of practices.",
keywords = "Epistemopolis, Knowledge workers, Responsible citizens, Student projects, Third environment",
author = "Barron, {Nancy G} and Sibylle Gruber",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "153--166",
booktitle = "International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Responsible knowledge workers

T2 - Rhetoric, media, and the third environment

AU - Barron, Nancy G

AU - Gruber, Sibylle

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We argue that successful participation and effective communication in online and offine communities is based on our knowledge of these communities, and on our interest in engaging in shared practices (Wenger, 1998). To better understand how we can prepare our students successfully for community participation in digital environments, geographically bound enviroments, and environments that merge the digital and the physical, we look at Javier Echeverria's work on telepolis and epistimopolis to show that any environment is constituted of communities that engage in shared practices. No space is ephemeral, but every space is part of a community that is joined into cities and into societies. We also borrow from the feld of business management, specifcally Peter F. (2006) who argues that the 21st century's knowledge society needs knowledge workers. To make sure that knowledge workers understand their roles in their communities, Drucker points out that we need to teach Aristotles principles of rhetoric to make sure that students understand the importance of purpose, intended audience, and speaker or author. Research that only requires an end product without constant analysis of purpose, audience, and writer in mind requires little knowledge (episteme) and focuses mostly on performance (techné). We also look to Drucker's (2006) work to help us think through strategies that can help students to become effective communicators. We provide student project examples as evidence for conscious attempts at participating in communities of practices.

AB - We argue that successful participation and effective communication in online and offine communities is based on our knowledge of these communities, and on our interest in engaging in shared practices (Wenger, 1998). To better understand how we can prepare our students successfully for community participation in digital environments, geographically bound enviroments, and environments that merge the digital and the physical, we look at Javier Echeverria's work on telepolis and epistimopolis to show that any environment is constituted of communities that engage in shared practices. No space is ephemeral, but every space is part of a community that is joined into cities and into societies. We also borrow from the feld of business management, specifcally Peter F. (2006) who argues that the 21st century's knowledge society needs knowledge workers. To make sure that knowledge workers understand their roles in their communities, Drucker points out that we need to teach Aristotles principles of rhetoric to make sure that students understand the importance of purpose, intended audience, and speaker or author. Research that only requires an end product without constant analysis of purpose, audience, and writer in mind requires little knowledge (episteme) and focuses mostly on performance (techné). We also look to Drucker's (2006) work to help us think through strategies that can help students to become effective communicators. We provide student project examples as evidence for conscious attempts at participating in communities of practices.

KW - Epistemopolis

KW - Knowledge workers

KW - Responsible citizens

KW - Student projects

KW - Third environment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81255172248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81255172248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:81255172248

VL - 7

SP - 153

EP - 166

BT - International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society

ER -